10-Q/A: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on August 7, 2009
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q/A
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13883
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
Delaware | 77-0448994 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer identification No.) | |
1720 North First Street, San Jose, CA. | 95112 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
408-367-8200
Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. Common shares outstanding as of August 3, 2009 20,744,952
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
PART I | 3 | |||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
Item 2 | 22 | |||||||
Item 3 | 32 | |||||||
Item 4 | 32 | |||||||
PART II | 34 | |||||||
Item 1 | 34 | |||||||
Item 4 | 35 | |||||||
Item 6 | 36 | |||||||
37 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this filing on Form 10-Q have been
prepared by management and are unaudited.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | 1,638,356 | $ | 1,583,079 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(492,989 | ) | (470,712 | ) | ||||
Net utility plant |
1,145,367 | 1,112,367 | ||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
41,498 | 13,869 | ||||||
Receivables: |
||||||||
Customers |
26,613 | 22,786 | ||||||
Regulatory balancing accounts |
12,612 | 4,629 | ||||||
Other |
7,687 | 7,442 | ||||||
Unbilled revenue |
20,273 | 13,112 | ||||||
Materials and supplies at average cost |
5,244 | 5,070 | ||||||
Taxes, prepaid expenses and other assets |
10,565 | 12,890 | ||||||
Total current assets |
124,492 | 79,798 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Regulatory assets |
199,194 | 198,293 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,906 | 3,906 | ||||||
Other assets |
30,281 | 23,743 | ||||||
Total other assets |
233,381 | 225,942 | ||||||
$ | 1,503,240 | $ | 1,418,107 | |||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value |
$ | 207 | $ | 207 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
214,451 | 213,922 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
191,098 | 188,820 | ||||||
Total common stockholders equity |
405,756 | 402,949 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
383,500 | 287,498 | ||||||
Total capitalization |
789,256 | 690,447 | ||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
2,664 | 2,818 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable: |
||||||||
Trade and other |
42,267 | 39,187 | ||||||
Regulatory balancing accounts |
6,077 | 2,585 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
4,013 | 3,295 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
34,189 | 35,311 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
101,210 | 123,196 | ||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
2,392 | 2,392 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
76,008 | 72,344 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions |
152,468 | 152,685 | ||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
83,282 | 83,312 | ||||||
Advances for construction |
179,566 | 176,163 | ||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
119,058 | 117,568 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
$ | 1,503,240 | $ | 1,418,107 | |||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
For the three months ended | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 116,667 | $ | 105,581 | ||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||
Water production costs |
41,702 | 40,349 | ||||||
Administrative and general |
19,386 | 13,835 | ||||||
Other operations |
14,330 | 12,766 | ||||||
Maintenance |
4,312 | 4,947 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,282 | 9,276 | ||||||
Income taxes |
6,789 | 6,442 | ||||||
Property and other taxes |
3,911 | 3,484 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
100,712 | 91,099 | ||||||
Net operating income |
15,955 | 14,482 | ||||||
Other income and expenses: |
||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
3,098 | 1,696 | ||||||
Non-regulated expenses, net |
(721 | ) | (1,132 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
72 | 7 | ||||||
Income taxes expense on other income and expenses |
(992 | ) | (219 | ) | ||||
Net other income and expenses |
1,457 | 352 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
5,962 | 5,157 | ||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
(640 | ) | (439 | ) | ||||
Net interest expense |
5,322 | 4,718 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 12,090 | $ | 10,116 | ||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.48 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.48 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||
Basic |
20,745 | 20,717 | ||||||
Diluted |
20,767 | 20,741 | ||||||
Dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 0.2950 | $ | 0.2925 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
For the six months ended | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 203,280 | $ | 178,502 | ||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||
Water production costs |
70,570 | 65,707 | ||||||
Administrative and general |
38,247 | 27,253 | ||||||
Other operations |
26,786 | 24,831 | ||||||
Maintenance |
8,947 | 9,060 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
20,480 | 18,498 | ||||||
Income taxes |
8,021 | 6,616 | ||||||
Property and other taxes |
7,999 | 7,223 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
181,050 | 159,188 | ||||||
Net operating income |
22,230 | 19,314 | ||||||
Other income and expenses: |
||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
5,979 | 4,601 | ||||||
Non-regulated expenses, net |
(3,362 | ) | (4,168 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
675 | 7 | ||||||
Income taxes expense on other income and expenses |
(1,330 | ) | (170 | ) | ||||
Net other income and expense |
1,962 | 270 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
11,000 | 10,171 | ||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
(1,319 | ) | (889 | ) | ||||
Net interest expense |
9,681 | 9,282 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,511 | $ | 10,302 | ||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||
Basic |
20,738 | 20,702 | ||||||
Diluted |
20,763 | 20,726 | ||||||
Dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 0.5900 | $ | 0.5850 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||
For the six months ended: | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,511 | $ | 10,302 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21,614 | 18,498 | ||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
(675 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Change in value of life insurance contracts |
(1,827 | ) | | |||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
3,729 | (184 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Receivables |
(12,065 | ) | (1,695 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
9,916 | 2,317 | ||||||
Other current assets |
(5,018 | ) | (7,962 | ) | ||||
Other current liabilities |
(143 | ) | 9,994 | |||||
Other changes, net |
518 | 1,488 | ||||||
Net adjustments |
16,049 | 22,449 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
30,560 | 32,751 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Utility plant expenditures: |
||||||||
Company funded |
(50,655 | ) | (38,527 | ) | ||||
Developer funded |
(2,275 | ) | (4,823 | ) | ||||
Purchase of life insurance |
(1,613 | ) | (1,367 | ) | ||||
Proceeds on sale of non-utility property |
750 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(53,793 | ) | (44,717 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
20,000 | 23,000 | ||||||
Repayment of short-term borrowing |
(48,000 | ) | | |||||
Advances and contributions in aid of construction |
2,414 | 5,166 | ||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
(2,520 | ) | (3,675 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(12,233 | ) | (12,191 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance cost of $3,390 |
96,610 | | ||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(5,439 | ) | (939 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock |
30 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
50,862 | 11,361 | ||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
27,629 | (605 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
13,869 | 6,734 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 41,498 | $ | 6,129 | ||||
Supplemental information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized |
$ | 8,553 | $ | 8,698 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
358 | 16 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Accrued payables for investments in utility plant |
$ | 7,623 | $ | 19,099 | ||||
Purchase of intangible assets with company common stock |
| $ | 1,300 | |||||
Utility plant contribution by developers |
$ | 7,584 | $ | 6,315 |
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2009
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2009
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1. Organization and Operations and Basis of Presentation
California Water Service Group (the Company) is a holding company that provides water utility and
other related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. California Water Service Company (Cal Water), Washington Water Service Company
(Washington Water), New Mexico Water Service Company (New Mexico Water), and Hawaii Water Service
Company, Inc. (Hawaii Water) provide regulated utility services under the rules and regulations
of their respective states regulatory commissions (jointly referred to herein as the
Commissions). CWS Utility Services and HWS Utility Services LLC provide non-regulated water
utility and utility-related services.
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim financial information has been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial
information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and therefore do not contain all of
the information and footnotes required by GAAP and the SEC for annual financial statements. The
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in its current
report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on April 7, 2009.
The preparation of the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet
dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments that are necessary to provide a fair presentation of the results for the
periods covered. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
for any future period.
Due to the seasonal nature of the water business, the results for interim periods are not
indicative of the results for a twelve-month period. Revenue and income are generally higher in
the warm, dry summer months when water usage and sales are greater. Revenue and income are lower
in the winter months when cooler temperatures and rainfall curtail water usage and sales.
The Company operates primarily in one business segment providing water and related utility
services.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue
Revenue includes monthly cycle customer billings for regulated water and wastewater services at
rates authorized by regulatory commissions and billings to certain non-regulated customers. In
addition, effective July 1, 2008 with the adoption of the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism
(WRAM) and the Modified Cost Balancing Account (MCBA), Cal Water records the difference between
what is billed to its regulated customers and that which is authorized by the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC).
Under the WRAM, Cal Water records the adopted level of volumetric revenues as authorized by the
CPUC for metered accounts (adopted volumetric revenues). In addition to volumetric-based
revenues, the revenue requirements approved by the CPUC include service charges, flat rate
charges, and other items that are not subject to the WRAM. The adopted volumetric revenue
considers the seasonality of consumption of water based upon historical averages. The variance
between adopted volumetric revenues and actual billed volumetric revenues for metered accounts is
recorded as a component of revenue with an offsetting entry to a current asset or liability
balancing account (tracked individually for each Cal Water district). The variance amount may be
positive or negative and represents amounts that will be billed or refunded to customers in the
future.
7
Table of Contents
Under the MCBA, Cal Water tracks adopted expense levels for purchased water, purchased power, and
pump taxes, as established by the CPUC. Variances (which include the effects of changes in both
rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power, and pump tax
expenses are recorded as a component of revenue, as the amount of such variances will be
recovered from or refunded to the Companys customers at a later date. This is reflected with an
offsetting entry to a current asset or liability regulatory balancing account (tracked
individually for each Cal Water district).
The balances in the WRAM and MCBA asset and liability accounts fluctuate on a monthly basis
depending upon the variance between adopted and actual results. The recovery or refund of the
WRAM is netted against the MCBA over- or under-recovery for the corresponding district and is
interest bearing at the current 90 day commercial paper rate. When the net amount for any
district achieves a pre-determined level at the end of any calendar year (i.e., at least 2.5
percent over- or under-recovery of the approved revenue requirement), Cal Water will file with
the CPUC to refund or collect the balance in the accounts. Account balances less than those
levels may be refunded or collected in Cal Waters general rate case proceedings or aggregated
with future calendar year balances for comparison with the recovery level. As of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the net aggregated asset included in accounts receivable was $12,612 and
$4,629, respectively, and the aggregate liability included in accounts payable was $6,077 and
$2,585, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations. The statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after years beginning after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141(R)
significantly changes current practices regarding business combinations. Among the more
significant changes, SFAS 141(R) expands the definition of a business and a business combination;
requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling
interests (including goodwill), measured at fair value at the acquisition date; requires
acquisition-related expenses and restructuring costs to be recognized separately from the
business combination and requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed from contractual and
non-contractual contingencies to be recognized at their acquisition date fair values with
subsequent changes recognized in earnings. Statement 141(R) requires that an entity record,
generally through income tax expense, adjustments made after the measurement period (and
adjustments during the measurement period that relate to facts and circumstances that did not
exist as of the acquisition date) to (1) valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets
and (2) acquired tax uncertainties. The Company adopted SFAS No. 141 (R) effective January 1,
2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. The statement amends ARB 51 to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The statement is effective for years beginning after December
15, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 effective January 1, 2009, and it did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB staff revisited Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issue No. 03-6 and
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Shared-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities. FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires
unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive nonrefundable dividends to also
be considered participating securities, as defined in EITF 03-6. The Company currently grants
certain unvested share-based payments awards that include rights to dividends similar to common
stockholders. The Company adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1 effective January 1, 2009 and it did not have a
material impact to its computation of earnings per share.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1). This FSP amends SFAS No. 107
and APB Opinion No. 28. Interim Financial Reporting to require disclosures about the fair value
of financial instruments for interim reporting periods that were previously only required for
annual reporting periods. An entity is required to disclose the fair value of financial assets
and liabilities together with the related carrying amount and where the carrying amount is
classified in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 is
effective prospectively for interim reporting periods after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted
FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 for the period ended June 30, 2009. See Note 9.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS No. 165 does not
significantly change the prior accounting practice for subsequent events except for the
requirement to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the
basis for that date. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 for the period ended June 30, 2009. There
were no significant events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date and before
the issuance of the financial statements on August 6, 2009 that would have significantly changed
the June 30, 2009 financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1,Employers Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets (FSP 132(R)-1). FSP 132(R)-1 amends and expands the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 132. An entity is required to provide qualitative disclosures about how
investment allocation decisions are made, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the
fair value of plan assets, and the concentration of risk within plan assets. Additionally,
quantitative disclosures are required showing the fair value of each major category of plan
assets, the levels in which each asset is classified within the fair value hierarchy, and a
reconciliation for the period of plan assets which are measured using significant unobservable
inputs. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective prospectively for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.
The Company will include the expanded disclosure requirement in the consolidated financial
statements for future annual periods.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of SFAS No. 162. The
Codification is a reorganization and compilation of all existing authoritative U.S. GAAP
recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities law are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this statement, the Codification will
supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September
15, 2009.
Note 3. Stock-based Compensation
Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Company had a stockholder-approved Long-Term Incentive Plan (which was replaced on April 27,
2005, by a stockholder-approved Equity Incentive Plan) that allowed granting of non-qualified
stock options. The Company had accounted for options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan
using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees. All outstanding options (83,250 shares at June 30, 2009) have an
exercise price equal to the market price on the date they were granted. The weighted average
price of the options is $24.90. All options granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan are fully
vested. No compensation expense was recorded for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 related to stock options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Equity Incentive Plan
Under the Companys Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by shareholders in April 2005, the
Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. In the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company granted Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) of 21,000 and 16,630
shares, respectively, of common stock both to officers and to directors of the Company. Employee
options vest ratably over 48 months, while director options vest at the end of 12 months. The
shares were valued at $38.38 and $37.60 per share, respectively, based upon the fair market value
of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
In addition, in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
equivalent to 71,500 and 47,070 shares, respectively, were granted to officers, which vest
ratably over 48 months and expire at the end of 10 years. The grant-date fair value for SARs was
determined using the Black Scholes model, which arrived at a fair value of $10.50 and $6.03 per
share, respectively. Upon exercise of a SAR, the appreciation is payable in common shares of the
Company.
The assumptions utilized in calculation of the SAR fair value were:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Expected dividend yield |
3.06 | % | 3.11 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
36.97 | % | 21.96 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.89 | % | 2.63 | % | ||||
Expected holding period in years |
6.0 | 5.2 |
The Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in the expense computation relating to RSAs and SARs
issued to officers as they vest monthly and, as a result, the expense is recorded for actual
vesting during the period. For outside directors the Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in
the expense computation relating to RSAs, as the Company expects 100% to vest at the end of
twelve months.
9
Table of Contents
The table below reflects SARs activity under the Equity Incentive Plan for the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Stock Appreciation Rights |
||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
108,710 | $ | 38.16 | |||||
Granted |
71,500 | 38.38 | ||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||
Cancelled |
| | ||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
180,210 | $ | 38.25 | |||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2009 |
64,352 | $ | 38.36 | |||||
The Company has recorded compensation costs for the RSAs and SARs in Operating Expense in the
amount of $221 and $186 for the quarters ended June 30, 2009, and June 30, 2008, respectively,
and $505 and $277 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note 4. Earnings Per Share Calculations
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share are noted below. RSAs are included in
the weighted stock outstanding as the shares have all the same voting and dividend rights as
issued and unrestricted common stock. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted into common stock.
The SARs outstanding of 180,210 and 108,710 are anti-dilutive for the second quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. All options are dilutive and the dilutive effect is shown
in the table below.
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 12,090 | $ | 10,116 | ||||
Less preferred dividends |
| (38 | ) | |||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 12,090 | $ | 10,078 | ||||
Weighted average common shares, basic |
20,745 | 20,717 | ||||||
Dilutive common stock options (treasury method) |
22 | 24 | ||||||
Shares used for dilutive computation |
20,767 | 20,741 | ||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.48 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.58 | $ | 0.48 | ||||
Six Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,511 | $ | 10,302 | ||||
Less preferred dividends |
| (76 | ) | |||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 14,511 | $ | 10,226 | ||||
Weighted average common shares, basic |
20,738 | 20,702 | ||||||
Dilutive common stock options (treasury method) |
25 | 24 | ||||||
Shares used for dilutive computation |
20,763 | 20,726 | ||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.49 | ||||
Note 5. Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides a qualified, defined-benefit, non-contributory pension plan for
substantially all employees. The Company makes annual contributions to fund the amounts accrued
for the qualified pension plan. The Company also maintains an unfunded, non-qualified,
supplemental executive retirement plan. The costs of the plans are charged to expense or are
capitalized in utility plant as appropriate.
10
Table of Contents
The Company offers medical, dental, vision, and life insurance benefits for retirees and their
spouses and dependents. Participants are required to pay a premium, which offsets a portion of
the cost.
Cash payments by the Company related to pension plans and other postretirement benefits were
$17,892 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The estimated cash contribution to the pension
plans for 2009 is $29,600. The estimated contribution to the other benefits plan for 2009 is
$9,600.
The following table lists components of the pension plans and other postretirement benefits. The
data listed under pension plan includes the qualified pension plan and the non-qualified
supplemental executive retirement plan. The data listed under other benefits is for all other
postretirement benefits.
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension Plan | Other Benefits | Pension Plan | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2,354 | $ | 1,336 | $ | 954 | $ | 361 | $ | 4,560 | $ | 2,671 | $ | 1,458 | $ | 722 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
3,158 | 1,628 | 890 | 433 | 6,176 | 3,256 | 1,408 | 865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(1,871 | ) | (1,578 | ) | (208 | ) | (156 | ) | (3,578 | ) | (3,155 | ) | (393 | ) | (312 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized net initial APBO (1) |
N/A | N/A | 69 | 69 | N/A | N/A | 138 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
1,533 | 468 | 29 | 29 | 3,066 | 936 | 58 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
505 | 81 | 612 | 75 | 966 | 162 | 811 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 5,679 | $ | 1,935 | $ | 2,346 | $ | 811 | $ | 11,190 | $ | 3,870 | $ | 3,480 | $ | 1,621 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | APBO Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
Note 6. Short-term Borrowings
The Company maintained a bank line of credit providing unsecured borrowings of up to $20 million
and Cal Water maintained a separate bank line of credit for an additional $55 million. On April
17, 2009, the Companys and Cal Waters loan agreements with Bank of America, N.A. were amended
so that the interest rate payable on outstanding borrowings is equal to the banks prime rate
minus 0.75 percentage points or the LIBOR rate plus 1.0 percentage point. Additionally, the
Company and Cal Water agreed to a fee of 0.15% based upon any unused commitment. The amendment
also changed the expiration date to April 16, 2010. The agreement with the Company requires a
debt to capitalization ratio of less than 0.667:1.0 and an interest coverage ratio of at least
2.5:1.0. As of June 30, 2009, the Company and Cal Water were in compliance with the bank
covenants in the loan agreements. At June 30, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings on the
Cal Water line of credit and the outstanding borrowings on the Company line of credit was $12
million.
Note 7. Long-Term Debt
On April 17, 2009, Cal Water completed the sale and issuance of $100 million aggregate principal
amount of its 5.875% First Mortgage Bonds due 2019, which are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Company. Pursuant to the note purchase agreements and supplements thereto under
which Cal Waters outstanding unsecured senior notes had been issued, Cal Water was required to
issue a new series of first mortgage bonds in exchange for each outstanding series of unsecured
senior notes with a like aggregate principal amount. The offering triggered this exchange
provision. Accordingly, upon the closing of the offering, Cal Water was required to issue an
additional series of first mortgage bonds under the mortgage indenture with a like aggregate
principal amount to the holders of each series of its outstanding unsecured senior notes in
exchange for each such series of notes.
In connection with the offering, Cal Water exercised its option to redeem the remaining $3.0
million of 8.86% Series J First Mortgage Bonds due 2023, which Cal Water assumed in connection
with its acquisition of Dominguez Water Corporation in 2000. The redemption was effected pursuant
to the terms of the indenture and supplemental indentures governing the Series J bonds. The
Series J bonds were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal
amount of the Series J bonds plus a make-whole premium of $1.0 million, and accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of redemption.
Note 8.
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The Company has significant commitments to lease certain office spaces and water systems, and for
the purchase of water from water wholesalers. These commitments are described in footnote 15 of
the current report on Form 8-K dated April 7, 2009.
11
Table of Contents
Contingencies
Chico Groundwater/Wausau Insurance Matter
In 1995, the State of Californias Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) named us as a
potential responsible party for cleanup of toxic contamination plumes, which contain
perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Chico groundwater. In December
2002, we were named along with other defendants in two lawsuits filed by DTSC for the cleanup of
the plumes. In 2007, we entered into Court approved consent decrees (Consent Decrees). The
Consent Decrees conditioned our performance upon many factors, including, but not limited to,
water pumped and treated by us must meet regulatory standards so we may distribute to its
customers. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decrees, we will incur capital costs of $1.5
million and future operating costs with a present value of approximately $2.6 million. In our
2007 general rate case (GRC) settlement negotiations, Division of Ratepayer Advocates have
tentatively agreed to track all costs associated with the Consent Decrees, including legal costs
to pursue insurance coverage, for potential future recovery in rates.
In connection with these suits, our insurance carrier, Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau)
filed a separate lawsuit against us for reimbursement of past defense costs which approximate
$1.5 million and a declaratory determination of coverage. On January 23, 2008, the Court heard
various parties motions and on September 25, 2008 issued its rulings that Wausau had a duty to
defend; therefore, the Company will not have to reimburse Wausau for previously incurred defense
costs. The Court did not find Wausaus actions were intended to harm the Company, so punitive
damages will not be recoverable by the Company. However, the Court also found that the issue of
policy coverage would be determined at trial. Trial commenced on June 1, 2009. During trial,
the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement which did not have a significant
impact to the Companys results of operations. The confidential settlement was fully executed on
June 23, 2009, and a dismissal with prejudice of the lawsuit has been submitted to the Court.
Other Groundwater Contamination
The Company has been and is involved in litigation against third parties to recover past and
future costs related to ground water contamination in our service areas. The cost of litigation
is expensed as incurred and any settlement is first offset against such costs. Any settlement in
excess of the cost to litigate is accounted for on a case by case basis based upon the nature of
the settlement. It is anticipated that the majority of the settlement will be reflected as a
benefit to the rate payers by offsetting future operating or capital costs.
The Company is involved in a lawsuit against major oil refineries regarding the contamination of
the ground water as a result of the gas additive MTBE. The Company entered into a partial
settlement with the defendants in April of 2008 that represent approximately 70% of the
responsible parties (as determined by the Superior Court). On October 22, 2008, the Company
received $34.2 million after deducting attorneys fees and litigation expenses. The Company is
aggressively pursuing legal action against the remaining responsible parties. The Company has
filed with the Commission to determine the appropriate regulatory treatment of the proceeds. It
anticipates that the proceeds will be used by the Company on infrastructure improvements. The
Company has filed with the Internal Revenue Service a request for a private letter ruling
regarding the taxability of the proceeds.
The Company believes the proceeds are non-taxable based upon its intent to reinvest them in
qualifying assets. When an agreement is reached with the Commission regarding the regulatory
treatment, or when the taxability is determined based upon proceedings with the Internal Revenue
Service, the Company will adjust the accounting of the settlement accordingly.
As previously reported, Cal Water has filed with the City of Bakersfield, in the Superior Court
of California, a lawsuit that names potentially responsible parties, who manufactured and
distributed products containing 1,2,3 trichloropropane (TCP) in California. TCP has been detected
in the ground water. The lawsuit seeks to recover treatment costs necessary to remove TCP. The
Court has now coordinated our action with other water purveyor cases (TCP Cases JCCP 4435) in San
Bernardino County. No trial date has yet been set.
The Company has filed in San Mateo County Superior Court a complaint (California Water Service
Company v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al. CIV 473093) against potentially responsible parties
that manufactured and distributed products, which contained perchloroethylene, also know as
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in California, to recover the past, present, and future treatment
costs. No trial date has yet been set.
12
Table of Contents
Other Legal Matters
From time to time, the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise
in the ordinary course of business. We review the status of each significant matter and assess
its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount of the range of loss can be estimated, the Company accrues a
liability for the estimated loss in accordance with SFAS No 5, Accounting of Contingencies.
Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict.
Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based on the best information available at the time.
While the outcome of these disputes and litigation matters cannot be predicted with any
certainty, management does not believe that when taking into account existing reserves that the
ultimate resolution of these matters will materially affect our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
From time to time, the Company has been named as a co-defendant in several asbestos related
lawsuits. The Company has been dismissed without prejudice in several of these cases. In other
cases our contractors and our insurance policy carriers have settled the cases with no effect on
the Companys financial statements. As such the Company does not currently believe that there is
any potential loss which is probable of occurring related to these matters and therefore no
accrual or contingency has been recorded.
Note 9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For those financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate a fair value, the
following methods and assumptions were used. For cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
accounts payable, the carrying amount approximates the fair value because of the short-term
maturity of the instruments. The fair value of the Companys
long-term debt is estimated at $399 million and
$290 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively, using the published quoted market price, if
available, or the discounted cash flow analysis, based on the current rates available to the Company for debt of
similar maturities and credit risk. The book value of the long-term debt is $384 million and $287
million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The fair value of advances for
construction contracts is estimated at $67 million as of June 30, 2009, and $66 million as of
December 31, 2008, based on data of recent market transactions.
Note 10. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
As discussed in Note 7, on April 17, 2009, Cal Water issued $100 million aggregate principal
amount of 5.875% First Mortgage bonds due 2019, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by
California Water Service Group (Parent Company). The following tables present the condensed
consolidating statements of income of California Water Service Group (Guarantor and Parent), Cal
Water (issuer and wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of California Water Service Group) and
other wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, the condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six-months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2009,
and December 31, 2008. The information is presented utilizing the equity method of accounting
for investments in consolidating subsidiaries.
13
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of June 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | | $ | 1,539,129 | $ | 106,426 | $ | (7,199 | ) | $ | 1,638,356 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (471,638 | ) | (22,412 | ) | 1,061 | (492,989 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net utility plant |
| 1,067,491 | 84,014 | (6,138 | ) | 1,145,367 | ||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,371 | 35,970 | 4,157 | | 41,498 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables and unbilled revenue |
11 | 62,906 | 4,268 | | 67,185 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
11,959 | 10,690 | 1,990 | (24,639 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
84 | 15,013 | 712 | | 15,809 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
13,425 | 124,579 | 11,127 | (24,639 | ) | 124,492 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets |
| 198,796 | 398 | | 199,194 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
406,243 | | | (406,243 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term affiliate notes receivable |
11,664 | | | (11,664 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 25,580 | 8,812 | (205 | ) | 34,187 | ||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
417,907 | 224,376 | 9,210 | (418,112 | ) | 233,381 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 431,332 | $ | 1,416,446 | $ | 104,351 | $ | (448,889 | ) | $ | 1,503,240 | ||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders equity |
$ | 405,756 | $ | 375,690 | $ | 36,921 | $ | (412,611 | ) | $ | 405,756 | |||||||||
Affiliate long-term debt |
| | 11,664 | (11,664 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
| 380,015 | 3,485 | | 383,500 | |||||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
405,756 | 755,705 | 52,070 | (424,275 | ) | 789,256 | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 1,918 | 746 | | 2,664 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | | | 12,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Payables to affiliates |
12,313 | 1,695 | 10,631 | (24,639 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 43,977 | 4,367 | | 48,344 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
1,263 | 32,143 | 4,771 | 25 | 38,202 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
25,576 | 79,733 | 20,515 | (24,614 | ) | 101,210 | ||||||||||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
| 2,392 | | | 2,392 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 73,667 | 2,341 | | 76,008 | |||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions |
| 152,468 | | | 152,468 | |||||||||||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
| 75,420 | 7,862 | | 83,282 | |||||||||||||||
Advances for construction |
| 178,033 | 1,533 | | 179,566 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
| 99,028 | 20,030 | | 119,058 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 431,332 | $ | 1,416,446 | $ | 104,351 | $ | (448,889 | ) | $ | 1,503,240 | ||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | | $ | 1,488,227 | $ | 102,051 | $ | (7,199 | ) | $ | 1,583,079 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (451,350 | ) | (20,354 | ) | 992 | (470,712 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net utility plant |
| 1,036,877 | 81,697 | (6,207 | ) | 1,112,367 | ||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
427 | 3,025 | 10,417 | | 13,869 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables and unbilled revenue |
72 | 44,049 | 3,848 | | 47,969 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
9,295 | 11,976 | 372 | (21,643 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
142 | 17,877 | (59 | ) | | 17,960 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
9,936 | 76,927 | 14,578 | (21,643 | ) | 79,798 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets |
905 | 196,990 | 398 | | 198,293 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
404,064 | | | (404,064 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term affiliate notes receivable |
10,851 | | | (10,851 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 20,242 | 7,612 | (205 | ) | 27,649 | ||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
415,820 | 217,232 | 8,010 | (415,120 | ) | 225,942 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 425,756 | $ | 1,331,036 | $ | 104,285 | $ | (442,970 | ) | $ | 1,418,107 | ||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders equity |
$ | 402,949 | $ | 372,337 | $ | 38,139 | $ | (410,476 | ) | $ | 402,949 | |||||||||
Affiliate long-term debt |
| | 10,851 | (10,851 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
| 283,820 | 3,678 | | 287,498 | |||||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
402,949 | 656,157 | 52,668 | (421,327 | ) | 690,447 | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 2,121 | 697 | | 2,818 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 28,000 | | | 40,000 | |||||||||||||||
Payables to affiliates |
9,642 | 201 | 11,800 | (21,643 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 38,003 | 3,769 | | 41,772 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
1,165 | 34,563 | 2,878 | | 38,606 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
22,807 | 102,888 | 19,144 | (21,643 | ) | 123,196 | ||||||||||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
| 2,392 | | | 2,392 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 70,003 | 2,341 | | 72,344 | |||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than
pensions |
| 152,685 | | | 152,685 | |||||||||||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
| 75,362 | 7,950 | | 83,312 | |||||||||||||||
Advances for construction |
| 174,625 | 1,538 | | 176,163 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
| 96,924 | 20,644 | | 117,568 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 425,756 | $ | 1,331,036 | $ | 104,285 | $ | (442,970 | ) | $ | 1,418,107 | ||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended June 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 109,797 | $ | 6,870 | $ | | $ | 116,667 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 39,979 | 1,723 | | 41,702 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 17,303 | 2,083 | | 19,386 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 12,386 | 2,058 | (114 | ) | 14,330 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 4,054 | 258 | | 4,312 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 9,448 | 869 | (35 | ) | 10,282 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
(40 | ) | 6,953 | (242 | ) | 118 | 6,789 | |||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 3,444 | 467 | | 3,911 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(40 | ) | 93,567 | 7,216 | (31 | ) | 100,712 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income (loss) |
40 | 16,230 | (346 | ) | 31 | 15,955 | ||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
181 | 1,987 | 1,249 | (319 | ) | 3,098 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| 87 | (808 | ) | | (721 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale on non-utility property |
| 77 | (5 | ) | | 72 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on
other income and expense |
(74 | ) | (876 | ) | (146 | ) | 104 | (992 | ) | |||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
107 | 1,275 | 290 | (215 | ) | 1,457 | ||||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
98 | 5,812 | 257 | (205 | ) | 5,962 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (505 | ) | (135 | ) | | (640 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
98 | 5,307 | 122 | (205 | ) | 5,322 | ||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
12,041 | | | (12,041 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 12,090 | $ | 12,198 | $ | (178 | ) | $ | (12,020 | ) | $ | 12,090 | ||||||||
16
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 190,073 | $ | 13,207 | $ | | $ | 203,280 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 67,059 | 3,511 | | 70,570 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 34,542 | 3,705 | | 38,247 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 23,417 | 3,597 | (228 | ) | 26,786 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 8,574 | 373 | | 8,947 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 18,883 | 1,666 | (69 | ) | 20,480 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
(65 | ) | 8,132 | (359 | ) | 313 | 8,021 | |||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 6,953 | 1,046 | | 7,999 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(65 | ) | 167,560 | 13,539 | 16 | 181,050 | ||||||||||||||
Net operating income (loss) |
65 | 22,513 | (332 | ) | (16 | ) | 22,230 | |||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
352 | 3,944 | 2,296 | (613 | ) | 5,979 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| (1,655 | ) | (1,707 | ) | | (3,362 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale on non-utility property |
| 675 | | | 675 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on
other income and expense |
(144 | ) | (1,207 | ) | (264 | ) | 285 | (1,330 | ) | |||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
208 | 1,757 | 325 | (328 | ) | 1,962 | ||||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
159 | 10,728 | 498 | (385 | ) | 11,000 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (1,050 | ) | (269 | ) | | (1,319 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
159 | 9,678 | 229 | (385 | ) | 9,681 | ||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
14,397 | | | (14,397 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 14,511 | $ | 14,592 | $ | (236 | ) | $ | (14,356 | ) | $ | 14,511 | ||||||||
17
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended June 30, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 101,710 | $ | 3,871 | $ | | $ | 105,581 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 39,439 | 910 | | 40,349 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 12,808 | 1,027 | | 13,835 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 11,861 | 1,019 | (114 | ) | 12,766 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 4,857 | 90 | | 4,947 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 8,829 | 483 | (36 | ) | 9,276 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
11 | 6,368 | (51 | ) | 114 | 6,442 | ||||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 3,207 | 277 | | 3,484 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
11 | 87,369 | 3,755 | (36 | ) | 91,099 | ||||||||||||||
Net operating income (loss) |
(11 | ) | 14,341 | 116 | 36 | 14,482 | ||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
197 | 762 | 980 | (243 | ) | 1,696 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| (512 | ) | (620 | ) | | (1,132 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
| 7 | | | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on
other income and expense |
(83 | ) | (104 | ) | (133 | ) | 101 | (219 | ) | |||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
114 | 153 | 227 | (142 | ) | 352 | ||||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
4 | 5,099 | 183 | (129 | ) | 5,157 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (450 | ) | 11 | | (439 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
4 | 4,649 | 194 | (129 | ) | 4,718 | ||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
10,017 | | | (10,017 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 10,116 | $ | 9,845 | $ | 149 | $ | (9,994 | ) | $ | 10,116 | |||||||||
18
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 170,978 | $ | 7,524 | $ | | $ | 178,502 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 64,050 | 1,657 | | 65,707 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 25,182 | 2,071 | | 27,253 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 22,870 | 2,189 | (228 | ) | 24,831 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 8,885 | 175 | | 9,060 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 17,602 | 968 | (72 | ) | 18,498 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
(2 | ) | 6,596 | (177 | ) | 199 | 6,616 | |||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 6,620 | 603 | | 7,223 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(2 | ) | 151,805 | 7,486 | (101 | ) | 159,188 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income |
2 | 19,173 | 38 | 101 | 19,314 | |||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
256 | 2,719 | 2,041 | (415 | ) | 4,601 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| (2,737 | ) | (1,431 | ) | | (4,168 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
| 7 | | | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on
other income and expense |
(104 | ) | 4 | (239 | ) | 169 | (170 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
152 | (7 | ) | 371 | (246 | ) | 270 | |||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
4 | 10,042 | 312 | (187 | ) | 10,171 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (900 | ) | 11 | | (889 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
4 | 9,142 | 323 | (187 | ) | 9,282 | ||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
10,152 | | | (10,152 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 10,302 | $ | 10,024 | $ | 86 | $ | (10,110 | ) | $ | 10,302 | |||||||||
19
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the six months ended June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 14,511 | $ | 14,592 | $ | (236 | ) | $ | (14,356 | ) | $ | 14,511 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
(14,397 | ) | | | 14,397 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends received from affiliates |
12,233 | | | (12,233 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 19,838 | 1,845 | (69 | ) | 21,614 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
| (675 | ) | | | (675 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in value of life insurance contracts |
| (1,827 | ) | | | (1,827 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
890 | 4,124 | (1,288 | ) | 3 | 3,729 | ||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in advances to affiliates |
(1,147 | ) | 2,780 | (1,633 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other changes, net |
768 | (8,196 | ) | 611 | 25 | (6,792 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net adjustments |
(1,653 | ) | 16,044 | (465 | ) | 2,123 | 16,049 | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
12,858 | 30,636 | (701 | ) | (12,233 | ) | 30,560 | |||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Company funded |
| (46,695 | ) | (3,960 | ) | | (50,655 | ) | ||||||||||||
Developer funded |
| (2,222 | ) | (53 | ) | | (2,275 | ) | ||||||||||||
Sale of non-utility property |
| 750 | | | 750 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of life insurance |
| (1,613 | ) | | | (1,613 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from affiliate notes receivable |
289 | | | (289 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
289 | (49,780 | ) | (4,013 | ) | (289 | ) | (53,793 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| 20,000 | | | 20,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of short-term borrowings |
| (48,000 | ) | | | (48,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Payment of affiliate notes receivable |
| | (289 | ) | 289 | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance cost of $3,390 |
| 96,610 | | | 96,610 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (5,034 | ) | (405 | ) | | (5,439 | ) | ||||||||||||
Advances and contributions in aid for construction |
| 2,257 | 157 | | 2,414 | |||||||||||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
| (2,495 | ) | (25 | ) | | (2,520 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid to non-affiliates |
(12,233 | ) | | | | (12,233 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to affiliates |
| (11,249 | ) | (984 | ) | 12,233 | | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
30 | | | | 30 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(12,203 | ) | 52,089 | (1,546 | ) | 12,522 | 50,862 | |||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
944 | 32,945 | (6,260 | ) | | 27,629 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
427 | 3,025 | 10,417 | | 13,869 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 1,371 | $ | 35,970 | $ | 4,157 | $ | | $ | 41,498 | ||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 10,302 | $ | 10,024 | $ | 86 | $ | (10,110 | ) | $ | 10,302 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
(10,152 | ) | | | 10,152 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends received from affiliates |
12,191 | | | (12,191 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 17,602 | 968 | (72 | ) | 18,498 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
| (7 | ) | | | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
| (1,248 | ) | 1,064 | | (184 | ) | |||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in advances to affiliates |
(1,203 | ) | (2,028 | ) | 3,231 | | | |||||||||||||
Other changes, net |
(830 | ) | 6,244 | (1,302 | ) | 30 | 4,142 | |||||||||||||
Net adjustments |
6 | 20,563 | 3,961 | (2,081 | ) | 22,449 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)operating
activities |
10,308 | 30,587 | 4,047 | (12,191 | ) | 32,751 | ||||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Company funded |
| (36,049 | ) | (2,478 | ) | | (38,527 | ) | ||||||||||||
Developer funded |
| (4,680 | ) | (143 | ) | | (4,823 | ) | ||||||||||||
Purchase of life insurance and other |
| (1,367 | ) | | | (1,367 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from affiliate notes receivable |
818 | | | (818 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
818 | (42,096 | ) | (2,621 | ) | (818 | ) | (44,717 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| 23,000 | | | 23,000 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of affiliate notes receivable |
| | (818 | ) | 818 | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
| 611 | 18 | | 629 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (1,193 | ) | (375 | ) | | (1,568 | ) | ||||||||||||
Advances and contributions in aid of construction |
| 4,497 | 669 | | 5,166 | |||||||||||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
| (3,513 | ) | (162 | ) | | (3,675 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid to non-affiliates |
(12,191 | ) | | | | (12,191 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to affiliates |
| (11,574 | ) | (617 | ) | 12,191 | | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
(12,191 | ) | 11,828 | (1,285 | ) | 13,009 | 11,361 | |||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,065 | ) | 319 | 141 | | (605 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
2,718 | 2,631 | 1,385 | | 6,734 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 1,653 | $ | 2,950 | $ | 1,526 | $ | | $ | 6,129 | ||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Item 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except where otherwise noted and per share amounts)
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except where otherwise noted and per share amounts)
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report, including all documents incorporated by reference, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning established by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (Act). Forward-looking statements in this quarterly report are based on
currently available information, expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections, and our
managements beliefs, assumptions, judgments and expectations about us, the water utility
industry and general economic conditions. These statements are not statements of historical fact.
When used in our documents, statements that are not historical in nature, including words like
expects, intends, plans, believes, may, estimates, assumes, anticipates,
projects, predicts, forecasts, should, seeks, or variations of these words or similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. They are based on numerous assumptions that we believe
are reasonable, but they are open to a wide range of uncertainties and business risks.
Consequently, actual results may vary materially from what is contained in a forward-looking
statement.
Factors which may cause actual results to be different than those expected or anticipated
include, but are not limited to:
| governmental and regulatory commissions decisions, including decisions on proper disposition of property; | ||
| changes in regulatory commissions policies and procedures; | ||
| the timeliness of regulatory commissions actions concerning rate relief; | ||
| changes in the capital markets and access to sufficient capital on satisfactory terms; | ||
| new legislation; | ||
| changes in accounting valuations and estimates; | ||
| changes in accounting treatment for regulated companies, including adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, if required; | ||
| electric power interruptions; | ||
| increases in suppliers prices and the availability of supplies including water and power; | ||
| fluctuations in interest rates; | ||
| changes in environmental compliance and water quality requirements; | ||
| acquisitions and the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies; | ||
| the ability to successfully implement business plans; | ||
| civil disturbances or terrorist threats or acts, or apprehension about the possible future occurrences of acts of this type; | ||
| the involvement of the United States in war or other hostilities; | ||
| our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; | ||
| labor relations matters as we negotiate with the unions; |
22
Table of Contents
| implementation of new information technology systems; | ||
| restrictive covenants in or changes to the credit ratings on current or future debt that could increase financing costs or affect the ability to borrow, make payments on debt, or pay dividends; | ||
| general economic conditions, including changes in customer growth patterns and our ability to collect billed revenue from customers; | ||
| changes in customer water use patterns and the effects of conservation; | ||
| the impact of weather on water sales and operating results; | ||
| the ability to satisfy requirements related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations on internal controls; and | ||
| the risks set forth in Risk Factors included elsewhere in this quarterly report. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, investors are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly
report or as of the date of any document incorporated by reference in this report, as applicable.
When considering forward-looking statements, investors should keep in mind the cautionary
statements in this quarterly report and the documents incorporated by reference. We are not under
any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We maintain our accounting records in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (GAAP) and as directed by the regulatory commissions to which we are
subject. The process of preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use
of estimates and assumptions on the part of management. The estimates and assumptions used by
management are based on historical experience and our understanding of current facts and
circumstances. Management believes that the following accounting policies are critical because
they involve a higher degree of complexity and judgment, and can have a material impact on our
results of operations and financial condition. These policies and their key characteristics are
discussed in detail in the 2008 Form 10-K. They include:
| revenue recognition; | ||
| expense balancing and memorandum accounts; | ||
| modified cost balancing accounts; | ||
| regulatory utility accounting; | ||
| income taxes; | ||
| pension benefits; | ||
| workers compensation, general liability and other claims; and | ||
| contingencies |
For the period ended June 30, 2009, there were no changes in the methodology for computing
critical accounting estimates, no additional accounting estimates met the standards for critical
accounting policies, and there were no material changes to the important assumptions underlying
the critical accounting estimates.
23
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF SECOND QUARTER 2009 OPERATIONS COMPARED TO
SECOND QUARTER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except share data
SECOND QUARTER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except share data
Overview
Second quarter of 2009 net income was $12.1 million equivalent to $0.58 per diluted common share
compared to net income of $10.1 million or $0.48 per diluted common share in the second quarter
of 2008. The increase in net income is primarily attributable to the increase in revenue due to
rate increases from the 2007 General Rate Case, effective July 1, 2008, and usage by new
customers primarily from our acquisitions in Hawaii which was offset by a decline in customer
usage from the prior year, due to warmer, dryer weather in 2008.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased $11.1 million or 11% to $116.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
As disclosed in the following table, the increase was due to increases in rates and usage by new
customers primarily from our acquisitions in Hawaii last year.
The factors that impacted the operating revenue for the second quarter of 2009 compared to 2008
are presented in the following table:
Rate increases |
$ | 19,199 | ||
Decrease in usage by existing customers |
(11,941 | ) | ||
Usage by new customers |
3,390 | |||
Net revenue decrease due to WRAM and MCBA |
(352 | ) | ||
Other |
791 | |||
Net operating revenue increase |
$ | 11,087 | ||
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
General Rate Case (GRC) Increases |
$ | 14,131 | ||
Purchased Water Offset Increases |
4,406 | |||
Balancing Account Adjustments |
248 | |||
Step Rate Increases |
414 | |||
Total Increase in Rates |
$ | 19,199 | ||
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $100.7 million for the second quarter of 2009, versus $91.1 million
for the same period in 2008, an 11% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes. It
represents the largest component of total operating expenses, accounting for approximately 41% of
total operating expenses in the second quarter of 2009. Water production expenses increased 3%
compared to the same period last year due to increased cost of purchased water and purchased
power, although usage was down.
Sources of water as a percent of total water production are listed in the following table:
Three Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Well production |
49 | % | 50 | % | ||||
Purchased |
47 | % | 46 | % | ||||
Surface |
4 | % | 4 | % | ||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
24
Table of Contents
Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water
obtain all of their water supply from wells. The components of water production costs are shown
in the table below:
Three Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||
Purchased water |
$ | 31,654 | $ | 30,785 | $ | 869 | ||||||
Purchased power |
7,584 | 6,965 | 619 | |||||||||
Pump taxes |
2,464 | 2,599 | (135 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 41,702 | $ | 40,349 | $ | 1,353 | ||||||
Purchased water costs increased due to price increases from water wholesalers. Total water
production, measured in acre feet, decreased by 11% during the second quarter of 2009 as compared
with the second quarter of 2008 due to lower customer usage primarily attributed to cooler
weather.
Administrative and general expense and other operations expense increased 27% to $33.7 million.
The primary increase was due to increased pension and postretirement benefit costs, other benefit
costs, and outside legal services. Effective January 1, 2009, wage increases became effective and
there was an increase in the number of employees. At June 30, 2009, there were 956 employees and
at June 30, 2008, there were 922 employees.
Maintenance expenses decreased by 13% to $4.3 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to
$4.9 million in the second quarter of 2008, due to decrease in main and service repairs.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.0 million, or 11%, because of 2008 capital
additions.
Federal and state income taxes charged to operating expenses and other income and expenses
increased $1.1 million, from a provision of $6.7 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $7.8
million in the second quarter of 2009, due to an increase in pretax income. We expect the
effective tax rate to be between 38% and 40% for fiscal year 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Non-regulated revenue, net of related expenses, and gain on sale of non-utility property
reflected net income of $1.5 million for the second quarter of 2009, compared to a gain of $0.4
million in the same period last year, which is an increase of $1.1 million. The change from the
prior year is due to a favorable change to the cash surrender value of the life insurance
contracts associated with our benefit plans.
Interest Expense
Total interest expense, net of interest capitalized, increased $0.6 million to $5.3 million for
the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period last year. This increase was attributable
to the additional interest on the first mortgage bonds issued in April less increased capitalized
interest on construction activity.
25
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 2009 COMPARED TO
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except per share data
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except per share data
Overview
Net income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, was $14.5 million, or $0.70 per diluted
common share compared to net income of $10.3 million or $0.49 per diluted common share for the
six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in net income is primarily attributable to the
increase in revenue due to the rate increases from the 2007 General Rate Case, effective July 1,
2008. This increase was partially offset by a decline in customer usage of water from the prior
year, which had higher demand than the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, due to weather. The
decline in customer usage of water during the six months of 2009 was partially offset by the net
increase in revenue from the WRAM and MCBA.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased $24.8 million, or 14%, to $203.3 million in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2009. As disclosed in the following table, the increase was primarily due to
increases in rates and usage by new customers primarily from our acquisitions in Hawaii last
year. The decrease in usage by existing customers due to unfavorable weather lowered operating
revenue which was partially offset by revenue recognized from the WRAM and MCBA.
The factors that affected the operating revenue for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009
compared to 2008 are presented in the following table:
Rate increases |
$ | 30,785 | ||
Decrease in usage by existing customers |
(17,151 | ) | ||
Increase in usage by new customers |
5,818 | |||
Net revenue increase due to WRAM and MCBA |
4,631 | |||
Other |
695 | |||
Net changes in operating revenue |
$ | 24,778 | ||
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
General Rate Case (GRC) Increase |
$ | 23,115 | ||
Purchased Water Offset Increase |
6,455 | |||
Step Rate Increase |
798 | |||
Balancing Account Adjustments |
417 | |||
Total increase in rates |
$ | 30,785 | ||
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $181.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, versus
$159.2 million for the same period in 2008, a 14% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power and pump taxes. Water
production expense represents the largest component of total operating expenses, accounting for
approximately 39% of total operating expenses. Water production expenses increased $4.9 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2009, or 7% compared to the same period last year due to
increased cost of purchased water and purchased power.
26
Table of Contents
Sources of water production as a percent of total water production are listed on the following
table:
Six Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Well production |
47 | % | 46 | % | ||||
Purchased |
49 | % | 50 | % | ||||
Surface |
4 | % | 4 | % | ||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water,
obtain all of their water supply from wells. The components of water production costs are shown
in the table below:
Six Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||
Purchased water |
$ | 54,594 | $ | 51,496 | $ | 3,098 | ||||||
Purchased power |
12,127 | 10,419 | 1,708 | |||||||||
Pump taxes |
3,849 | 3,792 | 57 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 70,570 | $ | 65,707 | $ | 4,863 | ||||||
Purchased water cost increased due to higher prices from wholesalers. Included in purchased water
are credits received from certain wholesale suppliers and the sale of unused water rights. There
were no significant credits during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008. The
increase in purchased power and pump taxes is due to the acquisitions in Hawaii last year.
Administration and general and other operations expenses were $65.0 million, increasing $12.9
million, or 25%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The primary increase was due to the
increased pension and postretirement benefit costs, other benefit costs, and outside legal
services. Payroll charged to operating expense increased $1.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Wages for union employees increased 3.1%, effective January 1, 2009. Overall
payroll costs (expensed and capitalized) increased 6.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
due to increases in the number of employees and higher wage rates. At June 30, 2009, there were
956 employees and at June 30, 2008, there were 922 employees.
Maintenance expense was down for the six months ended June 30, 2009, decreasing $0.1 million, or
1%. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.0 million, or 11%, because of increased
capital expenditures in 2008.
Federal and state income taxes increased $2.6 million, or 38%, for the six months ended June 30,
2009, due to the change in taxable income. We expect the effective tax rate to be between 38% and
40% for 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Other income, net of related expenses was $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to $0.3 million for the first six-months of 2008. The change from the prior year is due
to an increase in non-utility service revenues and a gain on the sale of non-utility property. In
addition, other expense was reduced by a gain in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts
associated with our benefit plans of $1.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. In the
prior year we recorded a loss (reduction) in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts
associated with our benefit plans of $1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. The
cash surrender value is determined in part by the market of certain underlining funds, the value
of which reflects changes in the stock market. Due to a significant increase in the stock market
in the first six months of 2009, there was a corresponding impact to the cash surrender value of
the life insurance contracts.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased $0.4 million to $9.7 million for the period ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2008. This increase was attributable to the
additional interest on the first mortgage bonds issued in April 2009 less increased capitalized
interest on construction activity.
27
Table of Contents
REGULATORY MATTERS
Rates and Regulations
The state regulatory commissions have plenary powers setting rates and operating standards. As
such, state commission decisions significantly impact our revenues, earnings, and cash flows. The
amounts discussed herein are generally annual amounts, unless specifically stated, and the
financial impact to recorded revenue is expected to occur over a 12-month period from the
effective date of the decision. In California, water utilities are required to make several
different types of filings. Most filings result in rate changes that remain in place until the
next General Rate Case (GRC). As explained below, surcharges and surcredits to recover balancing
and memorandum accounts as well as interim rate true-ups are temporary rate changes, which have
specific time frames for recovery.
GRCs, step rate increase filings, and offset filings change rates to amounts that will remain in
effect until the next GRC. The CPUC follows a rate case plan, which requires Cal Water to file a
GRC for each of its 24 regulated operating districts every three years. In a GRC proceeding, the
CPUC not only considers the utilitys rate setting requests, but may also consider other issues
that affect the utilitys rates and operations. Effective in 2004, Cal Waters GRC schedule was
shifted from a calendar year to a fiscal year with test years commencing on July 1st of each
year. The CPUC is generally required to issue its GRC decision prior to the first day of the test
year or authorize interim rates. As such, Cal Waters GRC decisions, prior to 2005, were
generally issued in the fourth quarter. Effective with the 2009 GRC, the processing time is
scheduled for eighteen months with rates effective on January 1, 2011.
Between GRC filings utilities may file escalation rate increases, which allow the utility to
recover cost increases, primarily from inflation and incremental investment, during the second
and third years of the rate case cycle. However, escalation rate increases are subject to a
weather-normalized earnings test. Under the earnings test, the CPUC may reduce the escalation
rate increase to prevent the utility from earning in excess of the authorized rate of return for
that district.
In addition, utilities are entitled to file offset filings. Offset filings may be filed to adjust
revenues for construction projects authorized in GRCs when the plant is placed in service or for
rate changes charged to the Company for purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes
(referred to as offsettable expenses). Such rate changes approved in offset filings remain in
effect until a GRC is approved. Additional information on the Companys regulatory process is
described in its annual report on Form 10-K dated March 2, 2009.
Remaining Unrecorded Balances from Previously Authorized Balancing Accounts Recoveries/Refunds
The total of unrecorded, under-collected memorandum and balancing accounts was approximately $0.9
million as of June 30, 2009.
2009 Regulatory Activity to Date
Cost of Capital Application
On May 1, 2008, Cal Water filed an application in compliance with the Rate Case Plan to establish
an allowable cost of capital for 2009, 2010, and 2011. The cost of capital evaluation includes
such issues as the authorized return on equity, the cost of debt, and the equitable capital
structure for Cal Water. This application, A.08-05-002, was considered along with similar
applications from two other multi-district California water utilities. On May 7, 2009, the CPUC
issued D.09-05-019 ruling on these issues and adopting a cost of capital for Cal Water for 2009.
The CPUC authorized Cal Water a 10.20% return on equity, the same provision as had been last
adopted by the CPUC for Cal Water in 2007 and 2008. The decision also allowed a capital structure
of 53% equity and 47% debt. Finally, the decision also allowed a temporary interest rate
balancing account to insulate the utilities and their ratepayers from volatile debt financing
costs due to market uncertainty. The total effect of the decision was a rate decrease, of $1.8
million effective June 2009 through July 2010.
As of July 31, 2009, the CPUC had not yet ruled on a proposed all-party settlement in the
proceeding that would establish a mechanism for adjusting return on equity in 2010 and 2011. Cal
Water cannot predict whether or when the CPUC may issue a decision regarding these issues.
28
Table of Contents
2009 California General Rate Case Filing
On July 2, 2009, Cal Water filed its required application for a general review of rates for all
operating districts and general operations. The application, A.09-07-001, requests an annual
increase in rates of $70.6 million on January 1, 2011, $24.8 million on January 1, 2012, and
$24.8 million on January 1, 2013. The filing marks the beginning of an eighteen month review
process. As a result, and based on past experience, Cal Water cannot predict at this time the
ultimate rate change the Commission will order. The Commission is generally required under state
law to allow Cal Water interim rates and an effective date of January 1, 2011 if a decision is
not rendered in the proceeding by that date.
Request for MTBE regulatory treatment
On July 10, 2009, Cal Water filed an application requesting the CPUC adopt ratemaking treatment
of proceeds from its partial settlement of MTBE contamination litigation. Cal Water has
requested that all of the proceeds be reinvested in infrastructure to treat or replace
MTBE-contaminated facilities. In addition, Cal Water has requested that 50% of the reinvestment
be included in rate base upon which Cal Water could earn its authorized fair and reasonable rate
of return. The remaining 50% of the settlement proceeds would be included in rate base as
contributions in aid of construction which does not earn a return. Cal Water has also requested
specific regulatory treatment of future settlement or litigation proceeds that may occur in the
consolidated MTBE cases. The CPUC has also opened a rulemaking proceeding, R.09-03-014, to
consider, among other things, whether it should adopt a standard policy for ratemaking treatment
of litigation proceeds. This rulemaking is scheduled to be concluded in the second quarter of
2010. The CPUC has previously authorized a wide range of regulatory treatments of contamination
litigation proceeds. Due to the open policy proceeding and the considerable variability in the
CPUCs past treatment of contamination litigation proceeds, Cal Water cannot predict the outcome
or timing of a decision in this proceeding at this time.
Washington 2009 General Rate Case Filing
On May 12, 2009, Washington Water Service Company filed a general rate increase for its regulated
operations with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). Washington Water
requested increases of $1.9 million on an annual basis. On July 30, 2009, the WUTC agreed to a
revised revenue requirement of $1.2 million in additional annual revenue and revised rates.
Other 2009 Regulatory filings
In January and February 2009, Cal Water filed advice letters to offset increased purchased
water and pump tax rates in eight of its regulated districts totaling $11.7 million in annual
revenue. Under CPUC advice letter processing rules, Cal Water charges the rates to its customers
upon filing of the expense offset advice letter. These rates were approved in late February 2009.
However, expense offsets are dollar-for-dollar increases in revenue to match increased expenses
and interact with the WRAM and MCBA mechanisms so that net operating income is not affected by an
offset increase.
In January 2009 the City of Hawthorne approved Cal Waters requested rate increase for its leased
water system. The increase will take effect in phases, with a $0.8 million annual increase in
February 2009, a $1.0 million annual increase in July 2009, and a $1.2 million annual increase in
January 2010.
In January 2009 Cal Water filed an application to the CPUC for approvals and consents related to
its secured debt offering, which was completed on April 17, 2009. The application included, among
other things, requests for (i) a waiver of a CPUC policy, which would allow debt offerings by Cal
Water of up to $100 million in principal amount be conducted through a single underwriter and
(ii) clarification that complying with the terms of the indenture for the outstanding unsecured
notes by granting the holders a first mortgage security interest upon the issuance of additional
first mortgage debt does not use any of the Cal Waters previously used financing authorization.
This application was approved by the Commission in March 2009. On March 30, 2009, the CPUC issued
decision 09-03-038 granting Cal Water (i) a competitive bidding rule exemption for the issuance
of $100 million of first mortgage bonds to the extent that no one purchaser from Cal Water is
permitted to acquire more than $20 million in debt in a calendar year, (ii) authority to exchange
$260 million of its senior notes for first mortgage bonds without obtaining additional financing
authority, and (iii) a competitive bidding rule exemption for an exchange of $260 million of
senior notes for first mortgage bonds.
In April 2009, Cal Water filed advice letters to resolve most of the December 31, 2008 WRAM and
MCBA balances. In May 2009, the CPUC authorized surcharges of $5.7 million and refunds of $3.8
million over a twelve month period beginning May 13, 2009.
29
Table of Contents
In June 2009, as allowed in the Commissions 2007 Rate Case Plan, Cal Water filed advice letters
for interim rate increases for eight districts effective in July 2009. These interim rates
generate $2.4 million annually beginning July 1, 2009. Under the Commissions prior rate case
plan, these districts would have had rates effective in July 2009. The revenues collected are
subject to refund or adjustment and will be trued up after a decision in the 2009 GRC. The rate
change is an incremental addition to the adopted revenue requirement and will increase revenues
from the WRAM until the next GRC.
In June 2009, Cal Water filed for escalation rate increases totaling $9.0 million effective in
July for sixteen districts. As of July 13, 2009, the CPUC staff has not yet approved these
increases, but they will be allowed to be included in rates on their filed effective dates
subject to refund until they are approved. The escalation rate increases were not reflected in
the 2009 GRC filing. Therefore, the revenue obtained is a part of the requested 2009 GRC
increase, not an addition to it. The rate change is an incremental addition to the adopted
revenue requirement and will increase revenues from the WRAM until the next GRC.
Throughout the calendar year, Cal Water plans to file advice letters to offset expected increases
in purchased water and pump tax charges in some districts. Cal Water cannot predict the exact
timing or dollar amount of the changes. However, expense offsets are dollar-for-dollar increases
in revenue to match increased expenses and interact with the WRAM and MCBA mechanisms so that net
operating revenue is not affected by an offset increase.
LIQUIDITY
Cash flows from Operations
Cash flows from operations were $30.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Cash flows
from operations is primarily generated by net income and changes in our operating assets and
liabilities. Cash generated by operations varies during the year which is dependent upon customer
billings and timing of contributions to our benefit plans and estimated tax payments.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we made contributions to our pension and retiree
health care plan of $17.9 million compared to $1.9 million paid during the six months ended June
30, 2008. As approved in the 2007 General Rate Case, we increased the funding level of our
pension and retiree health care plan from $16.4 million during 2008 to $27.5 million during 2009.
The water business is seasonal. Revenue is lower in the cool, wet winter months when less water
is used compared to the warm, dry summer months when water use is highest. This seasonality
results in the possible need for short-term borrowings under the bank lines of credit in the
event cash is not available during the winter period. The increase in cash flows during the
summer allows short-term borrowings to be paid down. Customer water usage can be lower than
normal in years when more than normal precipitation falls in our service areas or temperatures
are lower than normal, especially in the summer months. The reduction in water usage reduces cash
flows from operations and increases the need for short-term bank borrowings. In addition,
short-term borrowings are used to finance capital expenditures until long-term financing is
arranged.
Investing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we had company-funded capital expenditures of $50.7
million. For 2009, our capital budget is approximately $100 to $120 million.
Financing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2009,
there were no equity offerings. In April 2009, Cal Water issued $100 million of First Mortgage
Bonds at the rate of 5.875% due in 2019, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the
Company. The first mortgage
issuance costs were $3.4 million. Proceeds were used to pay down Cal Waters short-term borrowings and will be added to
Cal Waters general funds to be used for capital expenditures and other corporate items. Dividend
payments were higher than the prior year due to an increased dividend rate paid in the current
year. Both advances for construction and contribution in aid of construction decreased $2.8
million during the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008 primarily
due to a decline in developer activity.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Short-term liquidity is provided by bank lines of credit funds extended to us and certain of our
subsidiaries and by internally generated funds. Long-term financing is accomplished through the
use of both debt and equity. As of June 30, 2009, there were
short-term borrowings of $12 million outstanding on the line of credit. There were short-term
bank borrowings of $40 million at December 31, 2008.
30
Table of Contents
We made principal payments on our first mortgage bonds and other long-term debt payments of $4.4
million during the second quarter of 2009. As noted above, we issued $100 million of First
Mortgage Bonds. In connection with this issuance, Cal Waters outstanding senior notes in the
aggregate principal amount of $260 million were exchanged for first mortgage bonds with the same
interest rate and maturities the previously outstanding senior notes for which they were
exchanged.
Long-term financing, which includes senior notes, other debt securities, and common stock, has
typically been used to replace short-term borrowings and fund capital expenditures. Internally
generated funds, after making dividend payments, provide positive cash flow, but have not been at
a level to meet the needs of our capital expenditure requirements. Management expects this trend
to continue given our capital expenditures plan for the next 5 years. Some capital expenditures
are funded by payments received from developers for contributions in aid of construction or
advances for construction. Funds received for contributions in aid of construction are
non-refundable, whereas funds classified as advances in construction are refundable. Management
believes long-term financing is available to meet our cash flow needs through issuances in both
debt and equity instruments.
Credit Ratings
Cal Waters first mortgage bonds are rated by Standard & Poors (S&P). Since 2004, the credit
rating agency has maintained their rating of A+ and characterized us as stable. On April 8, 2009,
Standard & Poors issued a rating of AA- on the 5.875% $100 million First Mortgage Bonds issued
in April. If rating were downgraded in the future, it may result in a higher interest rate on
future debt.
Dividends, Book Value and Shareholders
The second quarter common stock dividend of $0.2950 per share was paid on May 15, 2009, compared
to a quarterly dividend in the second quarter of 2008 of $0.2925. This was Cal Waters 257th
consecutive quarterly dividend. Annualized, the 2009 dividend rate is $1.18 per common share,
compared to $1.17 in 2008. For the full year 2008, the payout ratio was 62% of net income. On a
long-term basis, our goal is to achieve a dividend payout ratio of 60% of net income accomplished
through future earnings growth.
At its July 29, 2009 meeting, the Board declared the third quarter dividend of $0.2950 per share
payable on August 21, 2009, to stockholders of record on August 10, 2009. This will be our 258th
consecutive quarterly dividend.
2009 Financing Plan
Cal Water is currently reviewing its financing needs for the balance of 2009 and 2010. We intend
to fund our capital needs in future periods through a relatively balanced approach between
long-term debt and equity.
Book Value and Stockholders of Record
Book value per common share was $19.56 at June 30, 2009 compared to $19.44 at December 31, 2008.
There are approximately 2,687 (not in thousands) stockholders of record for our common stock, as
of our record date, May 8, 2009.
Utility Plant Expenditures
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, capital expenditures totaled $53 million; $50.7
million was from company-funded projects and $2.3 million was from third-party-funded projects.
The planned 2009 company-funded capital expenditure budget is approximately $100 to $120 million.
The actual amount may vary from the budget number due to timing of actual payments related to
current year projects and prior year projects. We do not control third-party-funded capital
expenditures and therefore are unable to estimate the amount of such projects for 2009.
At June 30, 2009, construction work in progress was $116.9 million compared to $80.6 million at
December 31, 2008. Work in progress includes projects that are under construction but not yet
complete and placed in service.
31
Table of Contents
WATER SUPPLY
Our source of supply varies among our operating districts. Certain districts obtain all of their
supply from wells; some districts purchase all of their supply from wholesale suppliers; and
other districts obtain supply from a combination of wells and wholesale suppliers. A small
portion of supply comes from surface sources and is processed through Company-owned water
treatment plants. To the best of managements knowledge, we are meeting water quality,
environmental, and other regulatory standards for all company-owned systems.
In several of Cal Waters operating districts, we have service contracts with and lease equipment
from Basin Water, Inc. for the treatment of water from company-owned wells. The continued
treatment of water from these wells is critical to Cal Waters ability to meet customers demand
in those districts. On July 17, 2009, Basin Water, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and is
seeking to sell some of its assets and assignment of certain of their contracts to a third party.
We believe that Basin Water, Inc.s performance of its
contractual obligations and the availability of Basin Water, Inc.s equipment will be
uninterrupted during their bankruptcy proceedings. Furthermore, if the Basin Waters equipment
is no longer available, we believe there are additional suppliers that can supply the needed
equipment and treatment process required in order for us to meet our water supply needs.
Californias normal weather pattern yields little precipitation between mid-spring and mid-fall.
The Washington Water service areas receive precipitation in all seasons, with the heaviest
amounts during the winter. New Mexico Waters rainfall is heaviest in the summer monsoon season.
Hawaii Water receives precipitation throughout the year, with the largest amounts in the winter
months. Water usage in all service areas is highest during the warm and dry summers and declines
in the cool winter months. Rain and snow during the winter months replenish underground water
aquifers and fill reservoirs, providing the water supply for subsequent delivery to customers. To
date, snowpack water content and rainfall accumulation during the 2008 2009 water year is 95%
of normal (as of July 1, 2009 per the California Department of Water Resources). Precipitation in
the prior year was below average. Management believes that supply pumped from underground
aquifers and purchased from wholesale suppliers will be adequate to meet customer demand during
2009 and beyond. However, water rationing may be required if declared by the state or local
jurisdictions. Long-term water supply plans are developed for each of our districts to help
assure an adequate water supply under various operating and supply conditions. Some districts
have unique challenges in meeting water quality standards, but management believes that supplies
will meet current standards using current treatment processes.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
During the six-months ended June 30, 2009, there were no material changes in contractual
obligations outside the normal course of business.
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not hold, trade in or issue derivative financial instruments and therefore are not exposed
to risks these instruments present. Our market risk to interest rate exposure is limited because
the cost of long-term financing and short-term bank borrowings, including interest costs, is
covered in consumer water rates as approved by the commissions. We do not have foreign
operations; therefore, we do not have a foreign currency exchange risk. Our business is sensitive
to commodity prices and is most affected by changes in purchased water and purchased power costs.
Historically, the CPUCs balancing account or offsetable expense procedures allowed for increases
in purchased water and purchased power costs to be passed on to consumers. Traditionally, a
significant percentage of our net income and cash flows comes from California regulated
operations; therefore the CPUCs actions have a significant impact on our business. See Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies -Expense Balancing and Memorandum Accounts and Regulatory Matters.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(c) under
the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
32
Table of Contents
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that
any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to
apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and our CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures for the period ended June 30, 2009. Based on that evaluation,
we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable
assurance level.
(b) Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
33
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Chico Groundwater/Wausau Insurance Matter
As previously reported, in 1995, the State of Californias Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) named us as a potential responsible party for cleanup of toxic contamination plumes, which
contain perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Chico groundwater. In
December 2002, we were named along with other defendants in two lawsuits filed by DTSC for the
cleanup of the plumes. In 2007, we entered into Court approved consent decrees (Consent Decrees).
In connection with these suits, our insurance carrier, Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau)
filed a separate lawsuit against us for reimbursement of past defense costs which approximate
$1.5 million and a declaratory determination of coverage. On June 23, 2009, we executed a
confidential settlement with Wausau that did not significantly impact our financial statements.
Other Groundwater Contamination
The Company has been and is involved in litigation against third parties to recover past and
future costs related to ground water contamination in our service areas. The cost of litigation
is expensed as incurred and any settlement is first offset against such costs. Any settlement in
excess of the cost to litigate is accounted for on a case by case basis based upon the nature of
the settlement. It is anticipated that the majority of the settlement will be reflected as a
benefit to the rate payers by offsetting future operating or capital costs.
The Company is involved in a lawsuit against major oil refineries regarding the contamination of
the ground water as a result of the gas additive MTBE. The Company entered into a partial
settlement with the defendants in April of 2008 that represent approximately 70% of the
responsible parties (as determined by the Superior Court). On October 22, 2008, the Company
received $34.2 million after deducting attorneys fees and litigation expenses. The Company is
aggressively pursuing legal action against the remaining responsible parties. The Company has
filed with the Commission to determine the appropriate regulatory treatment of the proceeds. It
anticipates that the proceeds will have been used by the Company on infrastructure improvements.
The Company has filed with the Internal Revenue Service a request for a private letter ruling
regarding the taxability of the proceeds.
When an agreement is reached with the Commission regarding the regulatory treatment, or when the
taxability is determined based upon proceedings with the Internal Revenue Service, the Company
will adjust the accounting of the settlement accordingly.
As previously reported, Cal Water has filed with the City of Bakersfield, in the Superior Court
of California, a lawsuit that names potentially responsible parties, who manufactured and
distributed products containing 1,2,3 trichloropropane (TCP) in California. TCP has been detected
in the ground water. The lawsuit seeks to recover treatment costs necessary to remove TCP. The
Court has now coordinated our action with other water purveyor cases (TCP Cases JCCP 4435) in San
Bernardino County. No trial date has yet been set.
The Company has filed in San Mateo County Superior Court a complaint (California Water Service
Company v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al. CIV 473093) against potentially responsible parties
that manufactured and distributed products, which contained perchloroethylene, also know as
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in California, to recover the past, present, and future treatment
costs. No trial date has yet been set.
Other Legal Matters
From time to time, the Company has been named as a co-defendant in several asbestos related
lawsuits. The Company has been dismissed without prejudice in several of these cases. In other
cases, our contractors and/or our insurance policy carriers have settled the cases with no
effect on our financial statements.
From time to time, the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise
in the ordinary course of business. We review the status of each significant matter and assess
its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount of the range of loss can be estimated, we accrue a liability
for the estimated loss in accordance with SFAS No 5, Accounting of Contingencies. Legal
proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of
such uncertainties, accruals are based on the best information available at the time.
34
Table of Contents
While the outcome of these disputes and litigation matters cannot be predicted with any
certainty, management does not believe that when taking into account existing reserves that the
ultimate resolution of these matters will materially affect our financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
Item 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The annual meeting of stockholders of California Water Service Group was held on May 27, 2009 at
the headquarters office in San Jose, California.
(a) | At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, a Board of Directors to serve for the ensuing year was elected. The following directors were elected as nominated: |
Douglas M. Brown
Robert W. Foy
Edwin A. Guiles
Edward D. Harris, Jr. M.D.
Bonnie G. Hill
Richard P. Magnuson
Linda R. Meier
Peter C. Nelson
George A. Vera
Robert W. Foy
Edwin A. Guiles
Edward D. Harris, Jr. M.D.
Bonnie G. Hill
Richard P. Magnuson
Linda R. Meier
Peter C. Nelson
George A. Vera
(b) | One other proposal was voted on and approved by our stockholders at the meeting; the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accountant for 2009. | ||
(1) | Tabulation of the votes for the election of directors was: |
For | Abstain | |||||||
Douglas M. Brown |
17,658,137 | 254,086 | ||||||
Robert W. Foy |
17,657,213 | 255,009 | ||||||
Edwin A. Guiles |
17,675,477 | 236,745 | ||||||
Edward D. Harris, Jr. , M.D. |
17,650,993 | 261,229 | ||||||
Bonnie G. Hill |
17,637,599 | 274,623 | ||||||
Richard P. Magnuson |
17,603,489 | 308,733 | ||||||
Linda R. Meier |
17,513,693 | 398,529 | ||||||
Peter C. Nelson |
17,655,944 | 256,279 | ||||||
George A. Vera |
17,614,292 | 297,930 |
(2) | The stockholders ratified the Audit Committees selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as independent auditors for 2009. There were 17,709,097 votes in favor, 144,957 against, and 58,166 abstentions. |
35
Table of Contents
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit | Description | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 |
36
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP Registrant |
||||
August 6, 2009 | ||||
By: | /s/ Martin A. Kropelnicki | |||
Martin A. Kropelnicki | ||||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
37
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | Description | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 |
38