10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on November 9, 2009
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission file number 1-13883
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 77-0448994 | |
(State or other jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer identification No.) | |
of incorporation or organization) | ||
1720 North First Street, San Jose, CA. | 95112 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
408-367-8200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. Common shares outstanding as of November 2, 2009 20,744,952
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this filing on Form 10-Q have been
prepared by management and are unaudited.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | 1,676,287 | $ | 1,583,079 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(501,704 | ) | (470,712 | ) | ||||
Net utility plant |
1,174,583 | 1,112,367 | ||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
47,581 | 13,869 | ||||||
Receivables: |
||||||||
Customers |
31,722 | 22,786 | ||||||
Regulatory balancing accounts |
15,592 | 4,629 | ||||||
Other |
10,752 | 7,442 | ||||||
Unbilled revenue |
21,352 | 13,112 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies at weighted average cost |
5,457 | 5,070 | ||||||
Taxes, prepaid expenses and other assets |
7,922 | 12,890 | ||||||
Total current assets |
140,378 | 79,798 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Regulatory assets |
201,442 | 198,293 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,615 | 3,906 | ||||||
Other assets |
30,456 | 23,743 | ||||||
Total other assets |
234,513 | 225,942 | ||||||
$ | 1,549,474 | $ | 1,418,107 | |||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value |
$ | 207 | $ | 207 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
214,715 | 213,922 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
204,570 | 188,820 | ||||||
Total common stockholders equity |
419,492 | 402,949 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
373,541 | 287,498 | ||||||
Total capitalization |
793,033 | 690,447 | ||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
12,424 | 2,818 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable: |
||||||||
Trade and other |
46,894 | 39,187 | ||||||
Regulatory balancing accounts |
7,486 | 2,585 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
9,096 | 3,295 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
42,938 | 35,311 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
130,838 | 123,196 | ||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
2,392 | 2,392 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
83,512 | 72,344 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions |
152,467 | 152,685 | ||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
83,357 | 83,312 | ||||||
Advances for construction |
182,763 | 176,163 | ||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
121,112 | 117,568 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
$ | 1,549,474 | $ | 1,418,107 | |||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
For the three months ended | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 139,167 | $ | 131,702 | ||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||
Water production costs |
48,898 | 46,455 | ||||||
Administrative and general |
19,084 | 14,995 | ||||||
Other operations |
14,639 | 12,935 | ||||||
Maintenance |
4,405 | 3,824 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,259 | 9,281 | ||||||
Income taxes |
13,417 | 13,510 | ||||||
Property and other taxes |
4,371 | 3,940 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
115,073 | 104,940 | ||||||
Net operating income |
24,094 | 26,762 | ||||||
Other income and expenses: |
||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
5,194 | 3,805 | ||||||
Non-regulated expenses, net |
(3,464 | ) | (4,501 | ) | ||||
Income taxes (expense) benefit on other income and expenses |
(702 | ) | 288 | |||||
Net other income and expenses |
1,028 | (408 | ) | |||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
6,480 | 5,233 | ||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
(950 | ) | (1,065 | ) | ||||
Net interest expense |
5,530 | 4,168 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,592 | $ | 22,186 | ||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.94 | $ | 1.06 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.94 | $ | 1.06 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||
Basic |
20,745 | 20,717 | ||||||
Diluted |
20,767 | 20,740 | ||||||
Dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 0.2950 | $ | 0.2925 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
For the nine months ended | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 342,447 | $ | 310,204 | ||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||
Water production costs |
119,468 | 112,162 | ||||||
Administrative and general |
57,331 | 42,248 | ||||||
Other operations |
41,425 | 37,766 | ||||||
Maintenance |
13,352 | 12,884 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
30,739 | 27,779 | ||||||
Income taxes |
21,438 | 20,127 | ||||||
Property and other taxes |
12,371 | 11,163 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
296,124 | 264,129 | ||||||
Net operating income |
46,323 | 46,075 | ||||||
Other income and expenses: |
||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
11,173 | 9,452 | ||||||
Non-regulated expenses, net |
(6,826 | ) | (9,715 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
675 | 7 | ||||||
Income taxes (expense) benefit on other income and expenses |
(2,032 | ) | 118 | |||||
Net other income and expense |
2,990 | (138 | ) | |||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
17,480 | 15,405 | ||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
(2,270 | ) | (1,955 | ) | ||||
Net interest expense |
15,210 | 13,450 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 34,103 | $ | 32,487 | ||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.64 | $ | 1.55 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.64 | $ | 1.55 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||
Basic |
20,740 | 20,707 | ||||||
Diluted |
20,765 | 20,731 | ||||||
Dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 0.8850 | $ | 0.8775 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA
WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
For the nine months ended: | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 34,103 | $ | 32,487 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
32,178 | 29,722 | ||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
(675 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Change in value of life insurance contracts |
(3,555 | ) | 2,198 | |||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
11,975 | 1,990 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Receivables |
(31,449 | ) | (18,659 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
15,561 | 6,659 | ||||||
Other current assets |
4,572 | (647 | ) | |||||
Other current liabilities |
13,689 | 26,683 | ||||||
Other changes, net |
764 | 589 | ||||||
Net adjustments |
43,060 | 48,528 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
77,163 | 81,015 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Utility plant expenditures: |
||||||||
Company funded |
(82,862 | ) | (74,603 | ) | ||||
Developer funded |
(3,548 | ) | (6,020 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions |
| (14,341 | ) | |||||
Purchase of life insurance |
(1,711 | ) | (1,366 | ) | ||||
Proceeds on sale of non-utility property |
750 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(87,371 | ) | (96,330 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
20,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
Repayment of short-term borrowing |
(48,000 | ) | | |||||
Advances and contributions in aid of construction |
3,642 | 6,548 | ||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
(4,354 | ) | (5,383 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(18,353 | ) | (18,289 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance cost of $3,390 |
96,706 | 693 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(5,751 | ) | (1,861 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock |
30 | | ||||||
Redemption of preferred stock |
| (3,718 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
43,920 | 17,990 | ||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
33,712 | 2,675 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
13,869 | 6,734 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 47,581 | $ | 9,409 | ||||
Supplemental information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized |
$ | 8,717 | $ | 9,225 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
$ | 717 | $ | 6,586 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Accrued payables for investments in utility plant |
$ | 8,013 | $ | 10,248 | ||||
Purchase of intangible assets with company common stock |
| $ | 1,300 | |||||
Utility plant contribution by developers |
$ | 13,940 | $ | 11,519 |
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1. Organization and Operations and Basis of Presentation
California Water Service Group (the Company) is a holding company that provides water utility and
other related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. California Water Service Company (Cal Water), Washington Water Service Company
(Washington Water), New Mexico Water Service Company (New Mexico Water), and Hawaii Water Service
Company, Inc. (Hawaii Water) provide regulated utility services under the rules and regulations
of their respective states regulatory commissions (jointly referred to herein as the
Commissions). CWS Utility Services and HWS Utility Services LLC provide non-regulated water
utility and utility-related services.
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim financial information has been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial
information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and therefore do not contain all of
the information and footnotes required by GAAP and the SEC for annual financial statements. The
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in its current
report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on April 7, 2009.
The preparation of the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet
dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments that are necessary to provide a fair presentation of the results for the
periods covered. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
for any future period.
Due to the seasonal nature of the water business, the results for interim periods are not
indicative of the results for a twelve-month period. Revenue and income are generally higher in
the warm, dry summer months when water usage and sales are greater. Revenue and income are lower
in the winter months when cooler temperatures and rainfall curtail water usage and sales.
The Company operates primarily in one business segment providing water and related utility
services.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue
Revenue includes monthly cycle customer billings for regulated water and wastewater services at
rates authorized by regulatory commissions and billings to certain non-regulated customers. In
addition, effective July 1, 2008 with the adoption of the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism
(WRAM) and the Modified Cost Balancing Account (MCBA), Cal Water records the difference between
what is billed to its regulated customers and that which is authorized by the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC).
Under the WRAM, Cal Water records the adopted level of volumetric revenues as authorized by the
CPUC for metered accounts (adopted volumetric revenues). In addition to volumetric-based
revenues, the revenue requirements approved by the CPUC include service charges, flat rate
charges, and other items that are not subject to the WRAM. The adopted volumetric revenue
considers the seasonality of consumption of water based upon historical averages. The variance
between adopted volumetric revenues and actual billed volumetric revenues for metered accounts is
recorded as a component of revenue with an offsetting entry to a current asset or liability
balancing account (tracked individually for each Cal Water district). The variance amount may be
positive or negative and represents amounts that will be billed or refunded to customers in the
future.
7
Table of Contents
Under the MCBA, Cal Water tracks adopted expense levels for purchased water, purchased power, and
pump taxes, as established by the CPUC. Variances (which include the effects of changes in both
rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power, and pump tax
expenses are recorded as a component of revenue, as the amount of such variances will be
recovered from or refunded to the Companys customers at a later date. This is reflected with an
offsetting entry to a current asset or liability regulatory balancing account (tracked
individually for each Cal Water district).
The balances in the WRAM and MCBA asset and liability accounts fluctuate on a monthly basis
depending upon the variance between adopted and actual results. The recovery or refund of the
WRAM is netted against the MCBA over- or under-recovery for the corresponding district and is
interest bearing at the current 90-day commercial paper rate. When the net amount for any
district achieves a pre-determined level at the end of any calendar year (i.e., at least 2.5
percent over- or under-recovery of the approved revenue requirement), Cal Water will file with
the CPUC to refund or collect the balance in the accounts. Account balances less than those
levels may be refunded or collected in Cal Waters general rate case proceedings or aggregated
with future calendar year balances for comparison with the recovery level. As of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, the aggregated asset in regulatory balancing accounts was $15,592 and
$4,629, respectively, and the aggregate liability in regulatory balancing accounts was $7,486 and
$2,585, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued accounting standards for
business combinations. The new standards apply prospectively to business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning
on or after December 15, 2008. Among the more significant changes, it expands the definition of a
business and a business combination; requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests (including goodwill), measured at fair value at
the acquisition date; requires acquisition-related expenses and restructuring costs to be
recognized separately from the business combination and requires assets acquired and liabilities
assumed from contractual and non-contractual contingencies to be recognized at their acquisition
date fair values with subsequent changes recognized in earnings. Also, it requires that an entity
record, generally through income tax expense, adjustments made after the measurement period (and
adjustments during the measurement period that relate to facts and circumstances that did not
exist as of the acquisition date) to (1) valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets
and (2) acquired tax uncertainties. The Company adopted the new accounting standards for business
combinations effective January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued accounting standards for noncontrolling interests in
consolidated financial statements. The new standards establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. The statement is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company
adopted the new accounting standards for noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial
statements effective January 1, 2009, and it did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB issued new standards to compute earnings per share with the assumption that
instruments granted in shared-based payment transactions are participating securities. It
requires unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive nonrefundable dividends
to also be considered participating securities. The Company currently grants certain unvested
share-based payments awards that include rights to dividends similar to common stockholders. The
Company adopted the new standards effective January 1, 2009, and it did not have a material
impact to its computation of earnings per share.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new accounting standards for interim disclosures about fair value
of financial instruments. It requires interim financial reporting to require disclosures about
the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods that were previously only
required for annual reporting periods. An entity is required to disclose the fair value of
financial assets and liabilities together with the related carrying amount and where the carrying
amount is classified in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. It is effective prospectively
for interim reporting periods after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the new disclosure,
interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. See Note 9.
In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting standards for subsequent events. It does not
significantly change the prior accounting practice for subsequent events except for the
requirement to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the
basis for that date. The Company adopted the new disclosure requirements for the period ended
September 30, 2009, and evaluated subsequent events through the time the financial statements
were issued on November 9, 2009. All significant events and transactions that occurred after the
balance sheet date and before the issuance of the financial statements are detailed in Note 10.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting standards for the accounting standards codification
and the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles (codification). The Codification is
a reorganization and compilation of all existing authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB
to be applied to nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under
8
Table of Contents
authority of federal securities law are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
On the effective date of this statement, the Codification superseded
all then-existing
non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. This new accounting standard is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ended after September 15, 2009. The
Company adopted the codification effective September 30, 2009.
Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In December 2008, the FASB issued new accounting standards for employers disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets. An entity is required to provide qualitative disclosures
about how investment allocation decisions are made, the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets, and the concentration of risk within plan assets.
Additionally, quantitative disclosures are required showing the fair value of each major category
of plan assets, the levels in which each asset is classified within the fair value hierarchy, and
a reconciliation for the period of plan assets which are measured using significant unobservable
inputs. The new disclosure requirement is effective prospectively for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009. The Company will include the expanded disclosure requirement in the
consolidated financial statements for the annual period ending December 31, 2009.
Note 3. Stock-based Compensation
Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Company had a stockholder-approved Long-Term Incentive Plan (which was replaced on April 27,
2005, by a stockholder-approved Equity Incentive Plan) that allowed granting of non-qualified
stock options. The Company had accounted for options using the intrinsic value method. All
outstanding options (83,250 shares at September 30, 2009) have an exercise price equal to the
market price on the date they were granted. The weighted average price of the options is $24.90.
All options granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan are fully vested. No compensation expense
was recorded for the three or nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 related to
stock options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Equity Incentive Plan
Under the Companys Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by shareholders in April 2005, the
Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. In the nine-months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company granted Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) of 21,000 and
16,630 shares, respectively, of common stock both to officers and to directors of the Company.
Employee options vest ratably over 48 months, while director options vest at the end of 12
months. The shares were valued at $38.38 and $37.60 per share, respectively, based upon the fair
market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
In addition, in the nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Stock Appreciation Rights
(SARs) equivalent to 71,500 and 47,070 shares, respectively, were granted to officers, which vest
ratably over 48 months and expire at the end of 10 years. The grant-date fair value for SARs was
determined using the Black Scholes model, which arrived at a fair value of $10.50 and $6.03 per
share, respectively. Upon exercise of a SAR, the appreciation is payable in common shares of the
Company.
The assumptions utilized in calculation of the SAR fair value were:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Expected dividend yield |
3.06 | % | 3.11 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
36.97 | % | 21.96 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.89 | % | 2.63 | % | ||||
Expected holding period in years |
6.0 | 5.2 |
The Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in the expense computation relating to RSAs and SARs
issued to officers as they vest monthly and, as a result, the expense is recorded for actual
vesting during the period. For outside directors the Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in
the expense computation relating to RSAs, as the Company expects 100% to vest at the end of
twelve months.
9
Table of Contents
The table below reflects SARs activity under the Equity Incentive Plan for the nine-months ended
September 30, 2009.
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Stock Appreciation Rights: |
||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
108,710 | $ | 38.16 | |||||
Granted |
71,500 | 38.38 | ||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||
Cancelled |
| | ||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
180,210 | $ | 38.25 | |||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
75,622 | $ | 38.34 | |||||
The Company has recorded compensation costs for the RSAs and SARs in Operating Expense in the
amount of $263 and $134 for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008,
respectively, and $768 and $412 for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Note 4. Earnings Per Share Calculations
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share are noted below. RSAs are included in
the weighted stock outstanding as the shares have all the same voting and dividend rights as
issued and unrestricted common stock. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted into common stock.
The SARs outstanding of 180,210 and 108,710 were anti-dilutive for the third quarter and dilutive
for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. All options are dilutive and the dilutive
effect is shown in the table below.
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,592 | $ | 22,186 | ||||
Less preferred dividends |
| 289 | ||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 19,592 | $ | 21,897 | ||||
Weighted average common shares, basic |
20,745 | 20,717 | ||||||
Dilutive common stock options (treasury method) |
22 | 24 | ||||||
Shares used for dilutive computation |
20,767 | 20,741 | ||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.94 | $ | 1.06 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.94 | $ | 1.06 | ||||
Nine-months ended September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 34,103 | $ | 32,487 | ||||
Less preferred dividends |
| 366 | ||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 34,103 | $ | 32,121 | ||||
Weighted average common shares, basic |
20,740 | 20,707 | ||||||
Dilutive common stock options (treasury method) |
25 | 24 | ||||||
Shares used for dilutive computation |
20,765 | 20,731 | ||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 1.64 | $ | 1.55 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 1.64 | $ | 1.55 | ||||
Note 5. Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides a qualified, defined-benefit, non-contributory pension plan for
substantially all employees. The Company makes annual contributions to fund the amounts accrued
for the qualified pension plan. The Company also maintains an unfunded, non-qualified,
supplemental executive retirement plan. The costs of the plans are charged to expense or are
capitalized in utility plant as appropriate.
The Company offers medical, dental, vision, and life insurance benefits for retirees and their
spouses and dependents. Participants are required to pay a premium, which offsets a portion of
the cost.
10
Table of Contents
Cash payments by the Company related to pension plans and other postretirement benefits
were $23,690 for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009. The estimated cash contribution to
the pension plans during 2009 is $29,600. The estimated contribution to the other benefits plan
during 2009 is $10,020.
The following table lists components of the pension plans and other postretirement benefits. The
data listed under pension plan includes the qualified pension plan and the non-qualified
supplemental executive retirement plan. The data listed under other benefits is for all other
postretirement benefits.
Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension Plan | Other Benefits | Pension Plan | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2,279 | $ | 1,862 | $ | 728 | $ | 361 | $ | 6,839 | $ | 4,533 | $ | 2,186 | $ | 1,083 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
3,088 | 2,869 | 703 | 433 | 9,264 | 6,125 | 2,111 | 1,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(1,788 | ) | (1,436 | ) | (196 | ) | (156 | ) | (5,366 | ) | (4,591 | ) | (589 | ) | (468 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized net initial APBO (1) |
N/A | N/A | 69 | 69 | N/A | N/A | 207 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
1,533 | 1,524 | 29 | 29 | 4,599 | 2,460 | 87 | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
482 | 178 | 406 | 75 | 1,448 | 340 | 1,217 | 225 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 5,594 | $ | 4,997 | $ | 1,739 | $ | 811 | $ | 16,784 | $ | 8,867 | $ | 5,219 | $ | 2,432 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | APBO Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
Note 6. Short-term Borrowings
The Company maintained a bank line of credit providing unsecured borrowings of up to $20 million
and Cal Water maintained a separate bank line of credit for an additional $55 million. On April
17, 2009, the Companys and Cal Waters loan agreements with Bank of America, N.A. were amended
so that the interest rate payable on outstanding borrowings is equal to the banks prime rate
minus 0.75 percentage points or the LIBOR rate plus 1.0 percentage point. Additionally, the
Company and Cal Water agreed to a fee of 0.15% based upon any unused commitment. The amendment
also changed the expiration date to April 16, 2010. The agreement with the Company requires a
debt to capitalization ratio of less than 0.667:1.0 and an interest coverage ratio of at least
2.5:1.0. As of September 30, 2009, the Company and Cal Water were in compliance with the bank
covenants in the loan agreements. At September 30, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings on
the Cal Water line of credit and the outstanding borrowings on the Company line of credit was
$12 million. On October 27, 2009, the Company and Cal Water entered into unsecured credit
agreements that replaced and expanded their lines of credit. See Note 10.
Note 7. Long-Term Debt
On April 17, 2009, Cal Water completed the sale and issuance of $100 million aggregate principal
amount of its 5.875% First Mortgage Bonds due 2019, which are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Company. Pursuant to the note purchase agreements and supplements thereto
under which Cal Waters outstanding unsecured senior notes had been issued, Cal Water was
required to issue a new series of First Mortgage Bonds in exchange for each outstanding series
of unsecured senior notes with a like aggregate principal amount. The offering triggered this
exchange provision. Accordingly, upon the closing of the offering, Cal Water was required to
issue an additional series of First Mortgage Bonds under the mortgage indenture with a like
aggregate principal amount to the holders of each series of its outstanding unsecured senior
notes in exchange for each such series of notes.
In connection with the offering, Cal Water exercised its option to redeem the remaining $3.0
million of 8.86% Series J First Mortgage Bonds due 2023, which Cal Water assumed in connection
with its acquisition of Dominguez Water Corporation in 2000. The redemption was effected
pursuant to the terms of the indenture and supplemental indentures governing the Series J bonds.
The Series J bonds were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding
principal amount of the Series J bonds plus a make-whole premium of $1.0 million, and accrued
and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The Company has significant commitments to lease certain office spaces and water systems, and
for the purchase of water from water wholesalers. These commitments are described in footnote 15
of the current report on Form 8-K dated April 7, 2009.
11
Table of Contents
Contingencies
Chico Groundwater/Wausau Insurance Matter
In 1995, the State of Californias Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) named us as a
potential responsible party for cleanup of toxic contamination plumes, which contain
perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Chico groundwater. In December
2002, we were named along with other defendants in two lawsuits filed by DTSC for the cleanup of
the plumes. In 2007, we entered into Court approved consent decrees (Consent Decrees). The
Consent Decrees conditioned our performance upon many factors, including, but not limited to,
water pumped and treated by us must meet regulatory standards so we may distribute to its
customers. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decrees, we will incur capital costs of $1.5
million and future operating costs with a present value of approximately $2.6 million. In our
2007 general rate case (GRC) settlement negotiations, Division of Ratepayer Advocates have
tentatively agreed to track all costs associated with the Consent Decrees, including legal costs
to pursue insurance coverage, for potential future recovery in rates.
In connection with these suits, our insurance carrier, Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau)
filed a separate lawsuit against us for reimbursement of past defense costs which approximate
$1.5 million and a declaratory determination of coverage. On January 23, 2008, the Court heard
various parties motions and on September 25, 2008 issued its rulings that Wausau had a duty to
defend; therefore, the Company will not have to reimburse Wausau for previously incurred defense
costs. The Court did not find Wausaus actions were intended to harm the Company, so punitive
damages will not be recoverable by the Company. However, the Court also found that the issue of
policy coverage would be determined at trial. Trial commenced on June 1, 2009. During trial, the
parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement which did not have a significant impact
to the Companys results of operations. The confidential settlement was fully executed on June
23, 2009, and the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice by the court during the month of October 2009.
Other Groundwater Contamination
The Company has been and is involved in litigation against third parties to recover past and
future costs related to ground water contamination in our service areas. The cost of litigation
is expensed as incurred and any settlement is first offset against such costs. Any settlement in
excess of the cost to litigate is accounted for on a case by case basis based upon the nature of
the settlement. It is anticipated that the majority of the settlement will be reflected as a
benefit to the rate payers by offsetting future operating or capital costs.
The Company is involved in a lawsuit against major oil refineries regarding the contamination of
the ground water as a result of the gas additive MTBE. The Company entered into a partial
settlement with the defendants in April of 2008 that represent approximately 70% of the
responsible parties (as determined by the Superior Court). On October 22, 2008, the Company
received $34.2 million after deducting attorneys fees and litigation expenses. The Company is
aggressively pursuing legal action against the remaining responsible parties. The Company has
filed with the Commission to determine the appropriate regulatory treatment of the proceeds. It
anticipates that the proceeds will be used by the Company on infrastructure improvements. The
Company has filed with the Internal Revenue Service a request for a private letter ruling
regarding the taxability of the proceeds.
The Company believes the proceeds are non-taxable based upon its intent to reinvest them in
qualifying assets. When an agreement is reached with the Commission regarding the regulatory
treatment, or when the taxability is determined based upon proceedings with the Internal Revenue
Service, the Company will adjust the accounting of the settlement accordingly.
As previously reported, Cal Water has filed with the City of Bakersfield, in the Superior Court
of California, a lawsuit that names potentially responsible parties, who manufactured and
distributed products containing 1,2,3 trichloropropane (TCP) in California. TCP has been
detected in the ground water. The lawsuit seeks to recover treatment costs necessary to remove
TCP. The Court has now coordinated our action with other water purveyor cases (TCP Cases JCCP
4435) in San Bernardino County. No trial date has yet been set.
The Company has filed in San Mateo County Superior Court a complaint (California Water Service
Company v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al. CIV 473093) against potentially responsible parties
that manufactured and distributed products, which contained perchloroethylene, also know as
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in California, to recover the past, present, and future treatment
costs. No trial date has yet been set.
12
Table of Contents
Other Legal Matters
On October 14, 2009, Victor Guerrero and Hortencia Guerrero filed a Complaint in Solano County
Superior Court: Victor Guerrero and Hortencia Guerrero v. California Water Service Company, Case
No. FCSo34481. The Complaint for wrongful death seeks damages for negligence for failure to
maintain the water system, negligence for failure to warn, negligence and intentional concealment
causes of actions. The Company does not believe it has any liability in this matter and tendered
the lawsuit to its insurance carrier.
From time to time, the Company has been named as a co-defendant in several asbestos related
lawsuits. The Company has been dismissed without prejudice in several of these cases. In other
cases our contractors and our insurance policy carriers have settled the cases with no effect on
the Companys financial statements. As such the Company does not currently believe that there is
any potential loss which is probable of occurring related to these matters and therefore no
accrual or contingency has been recorded.
From time to time, the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise
in the ordinary course of business. We review the status of each significant matter and assess
its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount of the range of loss can be estimated, the Company accrues a
liability for the estimated loss in accordance with general accounting procedures for
contingencies. Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to
predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based on the best information available at
the time. While the outcome of these disputes and litigation matters cannot be predicted with
any certainty, management does not believe that when taking into account existing reserves that
the ultimate resolution of these matters will materially affect our financial position, results
of operations, or cash flows.
Note 9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For those financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate a fair value, the
following methods and assumptions were used. For cash equivalents, accounts receivable and
accounts payable, the carrying amount approximates the fair value because of the short-term
maturity of the instruments. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt is estimated at $396
million and $290 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, using the
published quoted market price, if available, or the discounted cash flow analysis, based on the
current rates available to the Company for debt of similar maturities and credit risk. The book
value of the long-term debt is $374 million and $287 million as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The fair value of advances for construction contracts is
estimated at $67 million as of September 30, 2009, and $66 million as of December 31, 2008,
based on discounted cash flows.
Note 10. Subsequent Event
On October 27, 2009, the Company and Cal Water entered into three-year syndicated unsecured
revolving line of credit agreements with sixteen banks to provide an unsecured revolving line of
credit of $50 million and $250 million, respectively. The base loan rate can vary from prime plus 50
basis points to prime plus 125 basis points depending on the Companys total capitalization
ration. Likewise, the unused commitment fee can vary from 25 basis points to 35 basis points
based on the same ratio. Based on the Companys planned capitalization during 2010 and future
years, the Company expects its pricing to be prime plus 75 basis points with a 25 basis point
unused commitment fee. California Water Service Group and subsidiaries which it designates may
borrow under the facilities. Borrowings by California Water Service Company will be repaid
within 12 months unless otherwise authorized by the CPUC. Bank of America was selected as lead
bank and administrative agent, with CoBank and Bank of China as co-syndication agents.
These unsecured credit agreements contain affirmative and negative covenants and events of
default customary for credit facilities of this type including, among other things, limitations
and prohibitions relating to additional indebtedness, liens, mergers, and asset sales. Also,
these unsecured credit agreements contain financial covenants governing the Company and its
subsidiaries consolidated total capitalization ratio and interest coverage ratio.
Note 11. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
As discussed in Note 7, on April 17, 2009, Cal Water issued $100 million aggregate principal
amount of 5.875% First Mortgage Bonds due 2019, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed
by California Water Service Group (Parent Company). The following tables present the condensed
consolidating statements of income of California Water Service Group (Guarantor and Parent), Cal
Water (issuer and wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of California Water Service Group) and
other wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the condensed consolidating balance sheets as
of September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008. The information is presented utilizing the equity
method of accounting for investments in consolidating subsidiaries.
13
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | | $ | 1,574,294 | $ | 109,192 | $ | (7,199 | ) | $ | 1,676,287 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (480,330 | ) | (22,470 | ) | 1,096 | (501,704 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net utility plant |
| 1,093,964 | 86,722 | (6,103 | ) | 1,174,583 | ||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
891 | 43,342 | 3,348 | | 47,581 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables and unbilled revenue |
37 | 74,998 | 4,383 | | 79,418 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
9,410 | 11,645 | 2,007 | (23,062 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
63 | 12,505 | 811 | | 13,379 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
10,401 | 142,490 | 10,549 | (23,062 | ) | 140,378 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets |
| 201,045 | 397 | | 201,442 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
422,011 | | | (422,011 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term affiliate notes receivable |
11,560 | | | (11,560 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 25,931 | 7,345 | (205 | ) | 33,071 | ||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
433,571 | 226,976 | 7,742 | (433,776 | ) | 234,513 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 443,972 | $ | 1,463,430 | $ | 105,013 | $ | (462,941 | ) | $ | 1,549,474 | ||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders equity |
$ | 419,492 | $ | 389,579 | $ | 38,925 | $ | (428,504 | ) | $ | 419,492 | |||||||||
Affiliate long-term debt |
| | 11,560 | (11,560 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
| 369,949 | 3,592 | | 373,541 | |||||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
419,492 | 759,528 | 54,077 | (440,064 | ) | 793,033 | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 11,918 | 506 | | 12,424 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | | | 12,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Payables to affiliates |
12,127 | 8 | 10,927 | (23,062 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 51,984 | 2,396 | | 54,380 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
353 | 45,811 | 5,833 | 37 | 52,034 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
24,480 | 109,721 | 19,662 | (23,025 | ) | 130,838 | ||||||||||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
| 2,392 | | | 2,392 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 81,990 | 1,374 | 148 | 83,512 | |||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions |
| 152,467 | | | 152,467 | |||||||||||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
| 75,470 | 7,887 | | 83,357 | |||||||||||||||
Advances for construction |
| 181,230 | 1,533 | | 182,763 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
| 100,632 | 20,480 | | 121,112 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 443,972 | $ | 1,463,430 | $ | 105,013 | $ | (462,941 | ) | $ | 1,549,474 | ||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | | $ | 1,488,227 | $ | 102,051 | $ | (7,199 | ) | $ | 1,583,079 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (451,350 | ) | (20,354 | ) | 992 | (470,712 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net utility plant |
| 1,036,877 | 81,697 | (6,207 | ) | 1,112,367 | ||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
427 | 3,025 | 10,417 | | 13,869 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables and unbilled revenue |
72 | 44,049 | 3,848 | | 47,969 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
9,295 | 11,976 | 372 | (21,643 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
142 | 17,877 | (59 | ) | | 17,960 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
9,936 | 76,927 | 14,578 | (21,643 | ) | 79,798 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets |
905 | 196,990 | 398 | | 198,293 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
404,064 | | | (404,064 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term affiliate notes receivable |
10,851 | | | (10,851 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 20,242 | 7,612 | (205 | ) | 27,649 | ||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
415,820 | 217,232 | 8,010 | (415,120 | ) | 225,942 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 425,756 | $ | 1,331,036 | $ | 104,285 | $ | (442,970 | ) | $ | 1,418,107 | ||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders equity |
$ | 402,949 | $ | 372,337 | $ | 38,139 | $ | (410,476 | ) | $ | 402,949 | |||||||||
Affiliate long-term debt |
| | 10,851 | (10,851 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
| 283,820 | 3,678 | | 287,498 | |||||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
402,949 | 656,157 | 52,668 | (421,327 | ) | 690,447 | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 2,121 | 697 | | 2,818 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 28,000 | | | 40,000 | |||||||||||||||
Payables to affiliates |
9,642 | 201 | 11,800 | (21,643 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 38,003 | 3,769 | | 41,772 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
1,165 | 34,563 | 2,878 | | 38,606 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
22,807 | 102,888 | 19,144 | (21,643 | ) | 123,196 | ||||||||||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
| 2,392 | | | 2,392 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 70,003 | 2,341 | | 72,344 | |||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions |
| 152,685 | | | 152,685 | |||||||||||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
| 75,362 | 7,950 | | 83,312 | |||||||||||||||
Advances for construction |
| 174,625 | 1,538 | | 176,163 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
| 96,924 | 20,644 | | 117,568 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 425,756 | $ | 1,331,036 | $ | 104,285 | $ | (442,970 | ) | $ | 1,418,107 | ||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended September 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 130,659 | $ | 8,508 | $ | | $ | 139,167 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 46,626 | 2,272 | | 48,898 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 17,231 | 1,853 | | 19,084 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 12,815 | 1,939 | (115 | ) | 14,639 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 4,269 | 136 | | 4,405 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 9,856 | 437 | (34 | ) | 10,259 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
(64 | ) | 12,824 | 480 | 177 | 13,417 | ||||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 3,893 | 478 | | 4,371 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(64 | ) | 107,514 | 7,595 | 28 | 115,073 | ||||||||||||||
Net operating income |
64 | 23,145 | 913 | (28 | ) | 24,094 | ||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
233 | 4,231 | 1,140 | (410 | ) | 5,194 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| (2,432 | ) | (1,032 | ) | | (3,464 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale on non-utility property |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Income tax (expense) on other income and expense |
(94 | ) | (734 | ) | (37 | ) | 163 | (702 | ) | |||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
139 | 1,065 | 71 | (247 | ) | 1,028 | ||||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
118 | 6,294 | 363 | (295 | ) | 6,480 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (728 | ) | (222 | ) | | (950 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
118 | 5,566 | 141 | (295 | ) | 5,530 | ||||||||||||||
Gross income |
85 | 18,644 | 843 | 20 | 19,592 | |||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
19,507 | | | (19,507 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,592 | $ | 18,644 | $ | 843 | $ | (19,487 | ) | $ | 19,592 | |||||||||
16
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 320,732 | $ | 21,715 | $ | | $ | 342,447 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 113,685 | 5,783 | | 119,468 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 51,773 | 5,558 | | 57,331 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 36,232 | 5,536 | (343 | ) | 41,425 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 12,843 | 509 | | 13,352 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 28,739 | 2,103 | (103 | ) | 30,739 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
(129 | ) | 20,956 | 121 | 490 | 21,438 | ||||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 10,846 | 1,525 | | 12,371 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(129 | ) | 275,074 | 21,135 | 44 | 296,124 | ||||||||||||||
Net operating income |
129 | 45,658 | 580 | (44 | ) | 46,323 | ||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
585 | 8,175 | 3,436 | (1,023 | ) | 11,173 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| (4,087 | ) | (2,739 | ) | | (6,826 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale on non-utility property |
| 675 | | | 675 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax (expense) on other income and expense |
(238 | ) | (1,941 | ) | (301 | ) | 448 | (2,032 | ) | |||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
347 | 2,822 | 396 | (575 | ) | 2,990 | ||||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
277 | 17,022 | 861 | (680 | ) | 17,480 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (1,778 | ) | (492 | ) | | (2,270 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
277 | 15,244 | 369 | (680 | ) | 15,210 | ||||||||||||||
Gross income |
199 | 33,236 | 607 | 61 | 34,103 | |||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
33,904 | | | (33,904 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 34,103 | $ | 33,236 | $ | 607 | $ | (33,843 | ) | $ | 34,103 | |||||||||
17
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended September 30, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 125,327 | $ | 6,375 | $ | | $ | 131,702 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 44,959 | 1,496 | | 46,455 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 13,716 | 1,279 | | 14,995 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 11,767 | 1,282 | (114 | ) | 12,935 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 3,705 | 119 | | 3,824 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 8,800 | 518 | (37 | ) | 9,281 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
(23 | ) | 13,030 | 406 | 97 | 13,510 | ||||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 3,556 | 384 | | 3,940 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(23 | ) | 99,533 | 5,484 | (54 | ) | 104,940 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income |
23 | 25,794 | 891 | 54 | 26,762 | |||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
97 | 2,064 | 1,845 | (201 | ) | 3,805 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| (2,481 | ) | (2,020 | ) | | (4,501 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on other income and expense |
(39 | ) | 170 | 76 | 81 | 288 | ||||||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
58 | (247 | ) | (99 | ) | (120 | ) | (408 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
57 | 5,051 | 212 | (87 | ) | 5,233 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (1,055 | ) | (10 | ) | | (1,065 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
57 | 3,996 | 202 | (87 | ) | 4,168 | ||||||||||||||
Gross income |
24 | 21,551 | 590 | 21 | 22,186 | |||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
22,162 | | | (22,162 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 22,186 | $ | 21,551 | $ | 590 | $ | (22,141 | ) | $ | 22,186 | |||||||||
18
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 296,305 | $ | 13,899 | $ | | $ | 310,204 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Water production costs |
| 109,009 | 3,153 | | 112,162 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 38,898 | 3,350 | | 42,248 | |||||||||||||||
Other operations |
| 34,637 | 3,471 | (342 | ) | 37,766 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 12,590 | 294 | | 12,884 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 26,402 | 1,486 | (109 | ) | 27,779 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes (benefit) |
(25 | ) | 19,626 | 230 | 296 | 20,127 | ||||||||||||||
Property and other taxes |
| 10,176 | 987 | | 11,163 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
(25 | ) | 251,338 | 12,971 | (155 | ) | 264,129 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income |
25 | 44,967 | 928 | 155 | 46,075 | |||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
353 | 5,829 | 3,886 | (616 | ) | 9,452 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense, net |
| (6,264 | ) | (3,451 | ) | | (9,715 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
| 7 | | | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on other income and expense |
(143 | ) | 174 | (163 | ) | 250 | 118 | |||||||||||||
Net other income and expense |
210 | (254 | ) | 272 | (366 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
62 | 15,093 | 524 | (274 | ) | 15,405 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (1,955 | ) | | | (1,955 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
62 | 13,138 | 524 | (274 | ) | 13,450 | ||||||||||||||
Gross income |
173 | 31,575 | 676 | 63 | 32,487 | |||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
32,314 | | | (32,314 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 32,487 | $ | 31,575 | $ | 676 | $ | (32,251 | ) | $ | 32,487 | |||||||||
19
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 34,103 | $ | 33,236 | $ | 607 | $ | (33,843 | ) | $ | 34,103 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
(33,904 | ) | | | 33,904 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends received from affiliates |
18,353 | | | (18,353 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 30,043 | 2,238 | (103 | ) | 32,178 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
| (675 | ) | | | (675 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in value of life insurance contracts |
| (3,555 | ) | | | (3,555 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
(1,490 | ) | 12,564 | 896 | 5 | 11,975 | ||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in advances to affiliates |
1,193 | 138 | (1,331 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Other changes, net |
117 | 2,673 | 310 | 37 | 3,137 | |||||||||||||||
Net adjustments |
(15,731 | ) | 41,188 | 2,113 | 15,490 | 43,060 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
18,372 | 74,424 | 2,720 | (18,353 | ) | 77,163 | ||||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Company funded |
| (75,318 | ) | (7,544 | ) | | (82,862 | ) | ||||||||||||
Developer funded |
| (3,532 | ) | (16 | ) | | (3,548 | ) | ||||||||||||
Sale of non-utility property |
| 750 | | | 750 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of life insurance |
| (1,711 | ) | | | (1,711 | ) | |||||||||||||
Reduction of loans to affiliates |
415 | | | (415 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
415 | (79,811 | ) | (7,560 | ) | (415 | ) | (87,371 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| 20,000 | | | 20,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of short-term borrowings |
| (48,000 | ) | | | (48,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Reduction of affiliate notes receivable |
| | (415 | ) | 415 | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance cost of $3,390 |
| 96,610 | 96 | | 96,706 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (5,116 | ) | (635 | ) | | (5,751 | ) | ||||||||||||
Advances and contributions in aid for construction |
| 3,347 | 295 | | 3,642 | |||||||||||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
| (4,263 | ) | (91 | ) | | (4,354 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid to non-affiliates |
(18,353 | ) | | | | (18,353 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to affiliates |
| (16,874 | ) | (1,479 | ) | 18,353 | | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
30 | | | | 30 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(18,323 | ) | 45,704 | (2,229 | ) | 18,768 | 43,920 | |||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
464 | 40,317 | (7,069 | ) | | 33,712 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
427 | 3,025 | 10,417 | | 13,869 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 891 | $ | 43,342 | $ | 3,348 | $ | | $ | 47,581 | ||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 32,487 | $ | 31,575 | $ | 676 | $ | (32,251 | ) | $ | 32,487 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
(32,314 | ) | | | 32,314 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends received from affiliates |
18,289 | | | (18,289 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 27,590 | 2,241 | (109 | ) | 29,722 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
| (7 | ) | | | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in value of life insurance contracts |
| 2,198 | | | 2,198 | |||||||||||||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
| 759 | 1,231 | | 1,990 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in advances to affiliates |
(14,561 | ) | (5,386 | ) | 19,947 | | | |||||||||||||
Other changes, net |
(735 | ) | 13,109 | 2,205 | 46 | 14,625 | ||||||||||||||
Net adjustments |
(29,321 | ) | 38,263 | 25,624 | 13,962 | 48,528 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
3,166 | 69,838 | 26,300 | (18,289 | ) | 81,015 | ||||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Company funded |
| (70,723 | ) | (3,880 | ) | | (74,603 | ) | ||||||||||||
Developer funded |
| (6,007 | ) | (13 | ) | | (6,020 | ) | ||||||||||||
Purchase of life insurance and other |
| (1,366 | ) | | | (1,366 | ) | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
| | (14,341 | ) | | (14,341 | ) | |||||||||||||
Loans to affiliates |
884 | | | (884 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred stock |
3,718 | | | (3,718 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
4,602 | (78,096 | ) | (18,234 | ) | (4,602 | ) | (96,330 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 28,000 | | | 40,000 | |||||||||||||||
Reduction of affiliate notes receivable |
| | (884 | ) | 884 | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
| 494 | 199 | | 693 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (1,264 | ) | (597 | ) | | (1,861 | ) | ||||||||||||
Advances and contributions in aid of construction |
| 5,634 | 914 | | 6,548 | |||||||||||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
| (5,171 | ) | (212 | ) | | (5,383 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid to non-affiliates |
(18,289 | ) | | | | (18,289 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to affiliates |
| (17,615 | ) | (674 | ) | 18,289 | | |||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred stock |
(3,718 | ) | (3,718 | ) | | 3,718 | (3,718 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(10,007 | ) | 6,360 | (1,254 | ) | 22,891 | 17,990 | |||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(2,239 | ) | (1,898 | ) | 6,812 | | 2,675 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
2,718 | 2,631 | 1,385 | | 6,734 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 479 | $ | 733 | $ | 8,197 | $ | | $ | 9,409 | ||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Item 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except where otherwise noted and per share amounts)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except where otherwise noted and per share amounts)
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report, including all documents incorporated by reference, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning established by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (Act). Forward-looking statements in this quarterly report are based on
currently available information, expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections, and our
managements beliefs, assumptions, judgments and expectations about us, the water utility
industry and general economic conditions. These statements are not statements of historical fact.
When used in our documents, statements that are not historical in nature, including words like
expects, intends, plans, believes, may, estimates, assumes, anticipates,
projects, predicts, forecasts, should, seeks, or variations of these words or similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. They are based on numerous assumptions that we believe
are reasonable, but they are open to a wide range of uncertainties and business risks.
Consequently, actual results may vary materially from what is contained in a forward-looking
statement.
Factors which may cause actual results to be different than those expected or anticipated
include, but are not limited to:
| governmental and regulatory commissions decisions, including decisions on proper disposition of property; | ||
| changes in regulatory commissions policies and procedures; | ||
| the timeliness of regulatory commissions actions concerning rate relief; | ||
| changes in the capital markets and access to sufficient capital on satisfactory terms; | ||
| new legislation; | ||
| changes in accounting valuations and estimates; | ||
| changes in accounting treatment for regulated companies, including adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, if required; | ||
| electric power interruptions; | ||
| increases in suppliers prices and the availability of supplies including water and power; | ||
| fluctuations in interest rates; | ||
| changes in environmental compliance and water quality requirements; | ||
| acquisitions and the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies; | ||
| the ability to successfully implement business plans; | ||
| civil disturbances or terrorist threats or acts, or apprehension about the possible future occurrences of acts of this type; | ||
| the involvement of the United States in war or other hostilities; | ||
| our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; | ||
| labor relations matters as we negotiate with the unions; |
22
Table of Contents
| implementation of new information technology systems; | ||
| restrictive covenants in or changes to the credit ratings on current or future debt that could increase financing costs or affect the ability to borrow, make payments on debt, or pay dividends; | ||
| general economic conditions, including changes in customer growth patterns and our ability to collect billed revenue from customers; | ||
| changes in customer water use patterns and the effects of conservation; | ||
| the impact of weather on water sales and operating results; | ||
| the ability to satisfy requirements related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations on internal controls; and | ||
| the risks set forth in Risk Factors included elsewhere in this quarterly report. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, investors are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly
report or as of the date of any document incorporated by reference in this report, as applicable.
When considering forward-looking statements, investors should keep in mind the cautionary
statements in this quarterly report and the documents incorporated by reference. We are not under
any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We maintain our accounting records in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (GAAP) and as directed by the regulatory commissions to which we are
subject. The process of preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use
of estimates and assumptions on the part of management. The estimates and assumptions used by
management are based on historical experience and our understanding of current facts and
circumstances. Management believes that the following accounting policies are critical because
they involve a higher degree of complexity and judgment, and can have a material impact on our
results of operations and financial condition. These policies and their key characteristics are
discussed in detail in the 2008 Form 10-K. They include:
| revenue recognition and the water revenue adjustment mechanism; | ||
| expense balancing and memorandum accounts; | ||
| modified cost balancing accounts; | ||
| regulatory utility accounting; | ||
| income taxes; | ||
| pension benefits; | ||
| workers compensation, general liability and other claims; and | ||
| contingencies |
For the period ended September 30, 2009, there were no changes in the methodology for computing
critical accounting estimates, no additional accounting estimates met the standards for critical
accounting policies, and there were no material changes to the important assumptions underlying
the critical accounting estimates.
23
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF THIRD QUARTER 2009 OPERATIONS COMPARED TO
THIRD QUARTER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except share data
THIRD QUARTER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except share data
Overview
Third quarter of 2009 net income was $19.6 million or $0.94 per diluted common share compared to
net income of $22.2 million or $1.06 per diluted common share in the third quarter of 2008. The
decrease in net income is primarily attributable to higher operating costs during the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the prior year. The most significant operating expense increases
were pension and other employee benefits, maintenance, depreciation, interest and legal expenses.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased $7.5 million or 6% to $139.2 million in the third quarter of 2009. As
disclosed in the following table, the increase was due to increases in rates and usage by new
customers primarily from our acquisitions in Hawaii last year.
The factors that impacted the operating revenue for the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2008
are presented in the following table:
Rate increases |
$ | 12,544 | ||
Usage by new customers |
3,258 | |||
Net change due to actual versus adopted results, usage, and other |
(8,338 | ) | ||
Net operating revenue increase |
$ | 7,464 | ||
The net change due to actual versus adopted results, usage, and other in the above table refers
to the revenue impact year over year of the change in revenue recognized by the Water Revenue
Adjustment Mechanism (WRAM) and Modified Cost Balancing Account (MCBA). The WRAM is impacted by
changes in consumption patterns from our historical trends as well as an increase in
conservation efforts. The MCBA, which records the differences in production costs from the
adopted costs, is recorded as an element of revenue as it represents pass through costs which
are billed to customers. The MCBA is impacted by changes in total production quantities, the
production mix of the source of water, the price paid for purchased water and power, and the
amount of pump taxes paid.
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
Purchased water offset increases |
$ | 5,844 | ||
Step-rate increases |
2,878 | |||
General Rate Case (GRC) increases |
2,726 | |||
Balancing account adjustments |
271 | |||
Other |
825 | |||
Total rate increases |
$ | 12,544 | ||
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $115.1 million for the third quarter of 2009, versus $104.9 million
for the same period in 2008, a 10% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes. It
represents the largest component of total operating expenses, accounting for approximately 43% of
total operating expenses in the third quarter of 2009. Water production expenses increased 5%
compared to the same period last year due to increased cost of purchased water and purchased
power, although usage was down. Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Washington Water, New
Mexico Water and Hawaii Water obtain all of their water supply from wells.
24
Table of Contents
Sources of water as a percent of total water production are listed in the following table:
Three Months Ended September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Well production |
51 | % | 51 | % | ||||
Purchased |
46 | % | 45 | % | ||||
Surface |
3 | % | 4 | % | ||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
The components of water production costs are shown in the table below:
Three Months Ended September 30 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||
Purchased water |
$ | 35,326 | $ | 33,858 | $ | 1,468 | ||||||
Purchased power |
10,089 | 9,285 | 804 | |||||||||
Pump taxes |
3,483 | 3,312 | 171 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 48,898 | $ | 46,455 | $ | 2,443 | ||||||
Purchased water costs increased due to price increases from water wholesalers. Total water
production, measured in acre feet, decreased by 7% during the third quarter of 2009 as compared
with the third quarter of 2008, due to lower customer usage primarily attributed to cooler
weather and voluntary conservation.
Administrative and general expense and other operations expense increased 21% to $33.7 million.
The primary increase was due to increased pension costs, other employee benefit costs, increased
payroll expense from new employees, and increased legal expenses. On January 1, 2009, wage
increases became effective and there was an increase in the number of employees. At September 30,
2009, there were 976 employees and at September 30, 2008, there were 936 employees.
Maintenance expenses increased by 15% to $4.4 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
$3.8 million in the third quarter of 2008, due to an increase in main and service repairs.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.0 million, or 11%, because of 2008 capital
additions.
Federal and state income taxes charged to operating expenses and other income and expenses
increased $0.9 million, from a provision of $13.2 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $14.1
million in the third quarter of 2009, due to a change in the effective tax rate recognized in the
third quarter due to revised estimated permanent differences. We expect the effective tax rate to
be between 40% and 40.7% for fiscal year 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Non-regulated revenue, net of related expenses, reflected net income of $1.0 million for the
third quarter of 2009 compared to a loss of $0.4 million in the same period last year, which is
an increase of $1.4 million. The change from the prior year is due to a favorable change of the
cash surrender value of the life insurance contracts associated with certain benefit plans.
Interest Expense
Total interest expense, net of interest capitalized, increased $1.4 million to $5.5 million for
the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period last year. This increase was attributable
to the additional interest on the First Mortgage Bonds issued in April 2009.
25
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 2009 COMPARED TO
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except per share data
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except per share data
Overview
Net income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, was $34.1 million, or $1.64 per
diluted common share compared to net income of $32.5 million or $1.55 per diluted common share
for the nine-months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in net income is primarily
attributable to the increase in non-regulated income and to an increase in net operating income
due to the rate increases from the 2007 General Rate Case (GRC), effective July 1, 2008. This
increase was partially offset by higher operating costs, the hiring of positions approved in the
2007 GRC, and an increase of interest expense attributable to the issuance of the First Mortgage
Bonds in April 2009.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased $32.2 million, or 10%, to $342.4 million in the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009. As disclosed in the following table, the increase was primarily due to
increases in rates and usage by new customers primarily from our acquisitions in Hawaii last
year. The decrease in usage by existing customers due to unfavorable weather and voluntary
conservation efforts lowered operating revenue.
The factors that affected the operating revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2009 compared to 2008 are presented in the following table:
Rate increases |
$ | 43,330 | ||
Increase in usage by new customers |
9,076 | |||
Net change due to actual verses adopted results, usage, and other |
(20,163 | ) | ||
Net changes in operating revenue |
$ | 32,243 | ||
The net change due to actual versus adopted results, usage, and other in the above table refers
to the revenue impact year over year of the change in revenue recognized by the WRAM and MCBA.
The WRAM is impacted by changes in consumption patterns from our historical trends as well as an
increase in conservation efforts. The MCBA, which records the differences in production costs
from the adopted costs, is recorded as an element of revenue as it is a pass through cost. The
MCBA is impacted by changes in total production quantities, the production mix of the source of
water, the price paid for purchased water and power, and the amount of pump taxes paid.
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
General Rate Case (GRC) increase |
$ | 25,841 | ||
Purchased water offset increase |
12,300 | |||
Step rate increase |
3,677 | |||
Balancing account adjustments |
687 | |||
Other |
825 | |||
Total rate increases |
$ | 43,330 | ||
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $296.1 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, versus
$264.1 million for the same period in 2008, a 12% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power and pump taxes. Water
production expense represents the largest component of total operating expenses, accounting for
approximately 40% of total operating expenses. Water production expenses increased $7.3 million
in the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, or 7%, compared to the same period last year due to
increased cost of purchased water and purchased power. Our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries,
Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water, obtain all of their water supply from wells.
26
Table of Contents
Sources of water production as a percent of total water production are listed on the following
table:
Nine-months ended September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Well production |
49 | % | 49 | % | ||||
Purchased |
48 | % | 47 | % | ||||
Surface |
3 | % | 4 | % | ||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
The components of water production costs are shown in the table below:
Nine-months ended September 30 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||
Purchased water |
$ | 89,920 | $ | 85,354 | $ | 4,566 | ||||||
Purchased power |
22,216 | 19,704 | 2,512 | |||||||||
Pump taxes |
7,332 | 7,104 | 228 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 119,468 | $ | 112,162 | $ | 7,306 | ||||||
Purchased water cost increased due to higher prices from wholesalers. Included in purchased water
are leases of unused water rights of $1.8 million and $1.6 million during the nine-months ended
September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively. The increase in purchased power is
primarily due to the acquisitions in Hawaii last year.
Administration and general and other operations expenses were $98.8 million, increasing $18.7
million, or 23%, for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to
increased pension and postretirement benefit costs, other benefit costs, new employees, and
outside legal services. Payroll charged to operating expense increased $1.6 million for the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009. Wages for union employees increased 3.0%, effective January
1, 2009. Overall payroll costs (expensed and capitalized) increased 6.7% for the nine-months
ended September 30, 2009, due to increases in the number of employees and higher wage rates. At
September 30, 2009, there were 976 employees and at September 30, 2008, there were 936 employees.
Maintenance expense increased for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, increasing $0.5
million, or 4%, due to an increase in main and service repairs. Depreciation and amortization
expense increased $3.0 million, or 11%, because of increased capital expenditures in 2008.
Federal and state income taxes increased $1.3 million, or 7%, for the nine-months ended September
30, 2009, due to a change in the effective tax rate due to revised estimated permanent
differences and change in taxable income. We expect the effective tax rate to be between 40% and
40.7% for 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Other income, net of related expenses, was $3.0 million for the nine-months ended September 30,
2009, compared to a loss of $0.1 million for the first nine-months of 2008. The change from the
prior year is due to an increase in non-utility service revenues and a gain on the sale of
non-utility property. In addition, other expense was reduced by a gain in cash surrender value of
life insurance contracts associated with our benefit plans of $3.6 million in the nine-months
ended September 30, 2009. In the prior year, we recorded a loss (reduction) in cash surrender
value of life insurance contracts associated with our benefit plans of $2.2 million for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2008. The cash surrender value is determined in part by the
market of certain underlining funds, the value of which reflects changes in the stock market. Due
to a significant increase in the stock market in the first nine months of 2009, there was a
corresponding increase to the cash surrender value of the life insurance contracts.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense increased $1.8 million to $15.2 million for the period ended September 30,
2009, compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008. This increase was attributable
to the additional interest on the First Mortgage Bonds issued in April 2009 less increased
capitalized interest on construction activity.
27
Table of Contents
REGULATORY MATTERS
Rates and Regulations
The state regulatory commissions have plenary powers setting rates and operating standards. As
such, state commission decisions significantly impact our revenues, earnings, and cash flows. The
amounts discussed herein are generally annual amounts, unless specifically stated, and the
financial impact to recorded revenue is expected to occur over a 12-month period from the
effective date of the decision. In California, water utilities are required to make several
different types of filings. Most filings result in rate changes that remain in place until the
next General Rate Case (GRC). As explained below, surcharges and surcredits to recover balancing
and memorandum accounts as well as interim rate true-ups are temporary rate changes, which have
specific time frames for recovery.
GRCs, step rate increase filings, and offset filings change rates to amounts that will remain in
effect until the next GRC. The CPUC follows a rate case plan, which requires Cal Water to file a
GRC for each of its 24 regulated operating districts every three years. In a GRC proceeding, the
CPUC not only considers the utilitys rate setting requests, but may also consider other issues
that affect the utilitys rates and operations. Effective in 2004, Cal Waters GRC schedule was
shifted from a calendar year to a fiscal year with test years commencing on July 1st of each
year. The CPUC is generally required to issue its GRC decision prior to the first day of the test
year or authorize interim rates. As such, Cal Waters GRC decisions, prior to 2005, were
generally issued in the fourth quarter. Effective with the 2009 GRC, the processing time is
scheduled for eighteen months with rates effective on January 1, 2011.
Between GRC filings utilities may file escalation rate increases, which allow the utility to
recover cost increases, primarily from inflation and incremental investment, during the second
and third years of the rate case cycle. However, escalation rate increases are subject to a
weather-normalized earnings test. Under the earnings test, the CPUC may reduce the escalation
rate increase to prevent the utility from earning in excess of the authorized rate of return for
that district.
In addition, utilities are entitled to file offset filings. Offset filings may be filed to adjust
revenues for construction projects authorized in GRCs when the plant is placed in service or for
rate changes charged to the Company for purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes
(referred to as offsettable expenses). Such rate changes approved in offset filings remain in
effect until a GRC is approved. Additional information on the Companys regulatory process is
described in its annual report on Form 10-K dated March 2, 2009.
Remaining Unrecorded Balances from Previously Authorized Balancing Accounts
Recoveries/Refunds
The total of unrecorded, under-collected memorandum and balancing accounts was approximately $1.1
million as of September 30, 2009.
2009 Regulatory Activity to Date
Cost of Capital Application
On May 1, 2008, Cal Water filed an application in compliance with the Rate Case Plan to establish
an allowable cost of capital for 2009, 2010, and 2011. The cost of capital evaluation includes
such issues as the authorized return on equity, the cost of debt, and the equitable capital
structure for Cal Water. This application, A.08-05-002, was considered along with similar
applications from two other multi-district California water utilities. On May 7, 2009, the CPUC
issued D.09-05-019 ruling on these issues and adopting a cost of capital for Cal Water for 2009.
The CPUC authorized Cal Water a 10.20% return on equity, the same provision as had been last
adopted by the CPUC for Cal Water in 2007 and 2008. The decision also allowed a capital structure
of 53% equity and 47% debt. Finally, the decision also allowed a temporary interest rate
balancing account to insulate the utilities and their ratepayers from volatile debt financing
costs due to market uncertainty. The total effect of the decision was a rate decrease, of $1.8
million in annual revenues effective in June 2009.
On July 30, 2009, the CPUC issued its D.09-07-051, which adopted an all-party settlement for a
cost of capital adjustment mechanism. Under the settlement, the authorized return on equity may
be adjusted prospectively based on annual changes in a bond index. The mechanism has a threshold
trigger of 100 basis points change in the index before any adjustment is made to Cal Waters
authorized return. Cal Water does not anticipate the mechanism will trigger in 2009.
28
Table of Contents
2009 California General Rate Case Filing
On July 2, 2009, Cal Water filed its required application for a general review of rates for all
operating districts and general operations. The application, A.09-07-001, requests an annual
increase in rates of $70.6 million on January 1, 2011, $24.8 million on January 1, 2012, and
$24.8 million on January 1, 2013. The filing marks the beginning of an eighteen month review
process. As a result, and based on past experience, Cal Water cannot predict at this time the
ultimate rate change the Commission will order. The Commission is generally required under state
law to allow Cal Water interim rates and an effective date of January 1, 2011 if a decision is
not rendered in the proceeding by that date.
Request for MTBE regulatory treatment
On July 10, 2009, Cal Water filed an application requesting the CPUC adopt ratemaking treatment
of proceeds from its partial settlement of MTBE contamination litigation. Cal Water has requested
that all of the proceeds be reinvested in infrastructure to treat or replace MTBE-contaminated
facilities. In addition, Cal Water has requested that 50% of the reinvestment be included in rate
base upon which Cal Water could earn its authorized fair and reasonable rate of return. The
remaining 50% of the settlement proceeds would be included in rate base as contributions in aid
of construction which does not earn a return. Cal Water has also requested specific regulatory
treatment of future settlement or litigation proceeds that may occur in the consolidated MTBE
cases. The CPUC has also opened a rulemaking proceeding, R.09-03-014, to consider, among other
things, whether it should adopt a standard policy for ratemaking treatment of litigation
proceeds. This rulemaking is scheduled to be concluded in the second quarter of 2010. The CPUC
has previously authorized a wide range of regulatory treatments of contamination litigation
proceeds. Due to the open policy proceeding and the considerable variability in the CPUCs past
treatment of contamination litigation proceeds, Cal Water cannot predict the outcome or timing of
a decision in this proceeding at this time.
Washington 2009 General Rate Case Filing
On May 12, 2009, Washington Water Service Company filed a general rate increase for its regulated
operations with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). Washington Water
requested increases of $1.9 million on an annual basis. On July 30, 2009, the WUTC approved
increased rates and a revised revenue requirement adding $1.2 million in additional annual
revenue.
Other 2009 Regulatory filings
In January and February 2009, Cal Water filed advice letters to offset increased purchased water
and pump tax rates in eight of its regulated districts totaling $11.7 million in annual revenue.
Under CPUC advice letter processing rules, Cal Water charges the rates to its customers upon
filing of the expense offset advice letter. These rates were approved in late February 2009.
However, expense offsets are dollar-for-dollar increases in revenue to match increased expenses
and interact with the WRAM and MCBA mechanisms so that net operating income is not affected by an
offset increase.
In January 2009 the City of Hawthorne approved Cal Waters requested rate increase for its leased
water system. The increase will take effect in phases, with a $0.8 million annual increase in
February 2009, a $1.0 million annual increase in July 2009, and a $1.2 million annual increase in
January 2010.
In January 2009 Cal Water filed an application to the CPUC for approvals and consents related to
its secured debt offering, which was completed on April 17, 2009. The application included, among
other things, requests for (i) a waiver of a CPUC policy, which would allow debt offerings by Cal
Water of up to $100 million in principal amount be conducted through a single underwriter and
(ii) clarification that complying with the terms of the indenture for the outstanding unsecured
notes by granting the holders a first mortgage security interest upon the issuance of additional
first mortgage debt does not use any of the Cal Waters previously used financing authorization.
This application was approved by the Commission in March 2009. On March 30, 2009, the CPUC issued
decision 09-03-038 granting Cal Water (i) a competitive bidding rule exemption for the issuance
of $100 million of First Mortgage Bonds to the extent that no one purchaser from Cal Water is
permitted to acquire more than $20 million in debt in a calendar year, (ii) authority to exchange
$260 million of its senior notes for First Mortgage Bonds without obtaining additional financing
authority, and (iii) a competitive bidding rule exemption for an exchange of $260 million of
senior notes for First Mortgage Bonds.
In April 2009, Cal Water filed advice letters to resolve most of the December 31, 2008 WRAM and
MCBA balances. In May 2009, the CPUC authorized surcharges of $5.7 million and refunds of $3.8
million over a twelve month period beginning May 13, 2009.
29
Table of Contents
In June 2009, as allowed in the Commissions 2007 Rate Case Plan, Cal Water filed advice letters
for interim rate increases for eight districts effective in July 2009. These interim rates
generate $2.4 million annually beginning July 1, 2009. Under the Commissions prior rate case
plan, these districts would have had rates effective in July 2009. The revenues collected are
subject to refund or adjustment and will be trued up after a decision in the 2009 GRC. The rate
change is an incremental addition to the adopted revenue requirement and will increase revenues
until the next GRC.
In June 2009, Cal Water filed for escalation rate increases totaling $9.0 million effective in
July for sixteen districts. These were approved effective in July 2009. The escalation rate
increases were not reflected in the 2009 GRC filing. Therefore, the revenue obtained is a part of
the requested 2009 GRC increase, not an addition to it. The rate change is an incremental
addition to the adopted revenue requirement and will increase revenues until the next GRC.
In July 2009, Cal Water received approval for seven rate base offset advice letters totaling $0.7
million additional annual revenue. The rate base offset rate increases were not reflected in the
2009 GRC filing. Therefore, the revenue obtained is a part of the requested 2009 GRC increase,
not an addition to it. The rate change is an incremental addition to the adopted revenue
requirement and will increase revenues until the next GRC.
Throughout the calendar year, Cal Water plans to file advice letters to offset expected increases
in purchased water and pump tax charges in some districts. Cal Water cannot predict the exact
timing or dollar amount of the changes. However, expense offsets are dollar-for-dollar increases
in revenue to match increased expenses and interact with the WRAM and MCBA mechanisms so that net
operating income is not affected by an offset increase.
LIQUIDITY
Cash flows from Operations
Cash flows from operations were $77.2 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009. Cash
flows from operations is primarily generated by net income and changes in our operating assets
and liabilities. Cash generated by operations varies during the year which is dependent upon
customer billings and timing of contributions to our benefit plans and estimated tax payments.
During the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, we made contributions to our pension and retiree
health care plan of $23.7 million compared to $1.6 million paid during the nine-months ended
September 30, 2008. The 2009 contributions were higher than the prior year because $11.7 million
of the 2008 pension and retiree health care was paid during 2009. As approved in the 2007
General Rate Case, we increased the funding level of our pension and retiree health care plan
from $16.4 million during 2008 to $27.9 million during 2009.
The water business is seasonal. Customer billings are lower in the cool, wet winter months when
less water is used compared to the warm, dry summer months when water use is highest. This
seasonality results in the possible need for short-term borrowings under the bank lines of credit
in the event cash is not available during the winter period. The increase in cash flows during
the summer allows short-term borrowings to be paid down. Customer water usage can be lower than
normal in years when more than normal precipitation falls in our service areas or temperatures
are lower than normal, especially in the summer months. The reduction in water usage reduces cash
flows from operations and increases the need for short-term bank borrowings. In addition,
short-term borrowings are used to finance capital expenditures until long-term financing is
arranged.
Investing Activities
During the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, we had company-funded capital expenditures of
$82.9 million. For 2009, our capital budget is approximately $100 to $120 million.
Financing Activities
During the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, there were no equity offerings. In April 2009,
Cal Water issued $100 million of First Mortgage Bonds at the rate of 5.875% due in 2019, which
are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. The first mortgage bond issuance costs
were $3.4 million. Proceeds were used to pay down Cal Waters short-term borrowings and will be
added to Cal Waters general funds to be used for capital expenditures and other corporate items.
In connection with the
offering, Cal Water exercised its option to redeem the remaining $3.0 million of 8.86% Series J
First Mortgage Bonds due 2023, which Cal Water assumed in connection with its acquisition of
Dominguez Water Corporation in 2000. The redemption was effected pursuant to the terms of the
indenture and supplemental indentures governing the Series J bonds. The Series J bonds were
30
Table of Contents
redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Series J
bonds plus a make-whole premium of $1.0 million, and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
redemption.
Dividend payments were higher than the prior year due to an increased dividend rate paid in the
current year. Both advances for construction and contribution in aid of construction decreased
$2.9 million during the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008
primarily due to a decline in developer activity.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Short-term liquidity is provided by bank lines of credit funds extended to us and certain of our
subsidiaries and by internally generated funds. Long-term financing is accomplished through the
use of both debt and equity. As of September 30, 2009, there were short-term borrowings of $12
million outstanding on the line of credit. There were short-term bank borrowings of $40 million
at December 31, 2008. On October 27, 2009, the Company and Cal Water entered into three-year
syndicated unsecured revolving line of credit agreements with sixteen banks to provide a
revolving line of credit of $50 million and $250 million, respectively.
We made principal payments on our First Mortgage Bonds and other long-term debt payments of $5.8
million during the nine-months ended September 30, 2009. As noted above, we issued $100 million
of First Mortgage Bonds. In connection with this issuance, Cal Waters outstanding senior notes
in the aggregate principal amount of $260 million were exchanged for First Mortgage Bonds with
the same interest rate and maturities as the previously outstanding senior notes for which they
were exchanged.
Bond series K in the amount of $10 million was reclassified to a short-term liability during the
nine-months ended September 30, 2009 because the bond matures during calendar year 2010.
Long-term financing, which includes First Mortgage Bonds and other debt securities, and common
stock, has typically been used to replace short-term borrowings and fund capital expenditures.
Internally generated funds, after making dividend payments, provide positive cash flow, but have
not been at a level to meet the needs of our capital expenditure requirements. Management expects
this trend to continue given our capital expenditures plan for the next 5 years. Some capital
expenditures are funded by payments received from developers for contributions in aid of
construction or advances for construction. Funds received for contributions in aid of
construction are non-refundable, whereas funds classified as advances in construction are
refundable. Management believes long-term financing is available to meet our cash flow needs
through issuances in both debt and equity instruments.
Credit Ratings
Cal Waters First Mortgage Bonds are rated by Standard & Poors (S&P). Since 2004, the credit
rating agency has maintained their rating of A+ and characterized us as stable. On April 8, 2009,
Standard & Poors issued a rating of AA- on the 5.875% $100 million First Mortgage Bonds issued
in April. If rating were downgraded in the future, it may result in a higher interest rate on
future debt.
Dividends, Book Value and Shareholders
The third quarter common stock dividend of $0.2950 per share was paid on August 21, 2009,
compared to a quarterly dividend in the third quarter of 2008 of $0.2925. This was Cal Waters
258th consecutive quarterly dividend. Annualized, the 2009 dividend rate is $1.18 per common
share, compared to $1.17 in 2008. For the full year 2008, the payout ratio was 62% of net income.
On a long-term basis, our goal is to achieve a dividend payout ratio of 60% of net income
accomplished through future earnings growth.
At its October 28, 2009 meeting, the Board declared the third quarter dividend of $0.2950 per
share payable on November 20, 2009, to stockholders of record on November 9, 2009. This will be
our 259th consecutive quarterly dividend.
2009 Financing Plan
Cal Water is currently reviewing its financing needs for 2010. On October 27, 2009, the Company and Cal Water entered into three-year syndicated unsecured revolving line of credit agreements with sixteen banks to provide a revolving line of credit of $50 million and $250 million, respectively. We intend to fund our capital needs in future periods through a relatively balanced approach between long-term debt and equity. |
31
Table of Contents
Book Value and Stockholders of Record
Book value per common share was $20.22 at September 30, 2009 compared to $19.44 at December 31,
2008.
There were approximately 2,637 (not in thousands) stockholders of record for our common stock on
October 29, 2009.
Utility Plant Expenditures
During the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, capital expenditures totaled $86.4 million;
$82.9 million was from company-funded projects and $3.5 million was from third-party-funded
projects. The planned 2009 company-funded capital expenditure budget is approximately $100 to
$120 million. The actual amount may vary from the budget number due to timing of actual payments
related to current year projects and prior year projects. We do not control third-party-funded
capital expenditures and therefore are unable to estimate the amount of such projects for 2009.
At September 30, 2009, construction work in progress was $126.3 million compared to $80.6 million
at December 31, 2008. Work in progress includes projects that are under construction but not yet
complete and placed in service.
WATER SUPPLY
Our source of supply varies among our operating districts. Certain districts obtain all of their
supply from wells; some districts purchase all of their supply from wholesale suppliers; and
other districts obtain supply from a combination of wells and wholesale suppliers. A small
portion of supply comes from surface sources and is processed through Company-owned water
treatment plants. To the best of managements knowledge, we are meeting water quality,
environmental, and other regulatory standards for all company-owned systems.
In several of Cal Waters operating districts, we have service contracts with and lease equipment
from Basin Water, Inc. for the treatment of water from company-owned wells. The continued
treatment of water from these wells is critical to Cal Waters ability to meet customers demand
in those districts. On July 17, 2009, Basin Water, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and was
seeking to sell some of its assets and assignment of certain of their contracts to a third party.
The sale of the assets and assignments occurred during third quarter 2009 and did not impact our
operations. We believe the performance of these contractual obligations and the availability of
this equipment will be uninterrupted. Furthermore, if this equipment is no longer available, we
believe there are additional suppliers that can supply the needed equipment and treatment process
required in order for us to meet our water supply needs.
Californias normal weather pattern yields little precipitation between mid-spring and mid-fall.
The Washington Water service areas receive precipitation in all seasons, with the heaviest
amounts during the winter. New Mexico Waters rainfall is heaviest in the summer monsoon season.
Hawaii Water receives precipitation throughout the year, with the largest amounts in the winter
months. Water usage in all service areas is highest during the warm and dry summers and declines
in the cool winter months. Rain and snow during the winter months replenish underground water
aquifers and fill reservoirs, providing the water supply for subsequent delivery to customers.
Snowpack water content and rainfall accumulation during the 2008 2009 water year was 93% of
normal (as of October 1, 2009 per the California Department of Water Resources). Precipitation in
the prior year was below average. Management believes that supply pumped from underground
aquifers and purchased from wholesale suppliers will be adequate to meet customer demand during
2009 and beyond. However, water rationing may be required if declared by the state or local
jurisdictions. Long-term water supply plans are developed for each of our districts to help
assure an adequate water supply under various operating and supply conditions. Some districts
have unique challenges in meeting water quality standards, but management believes that supplies
will meet current standards using current treatment processes.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
During the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, there were no material changes in contractual
obligations outside the normal course of business.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not hold, trade in or issue derivative financial instruments and therefore are not exposed
to risks these instruments present. Our market risk to interest rate exposure is limited because
the cost of long-term financing and short-term bank borrowings, including interest costs, is
covered in consumer water rates as approved by the commissions. We do not have foreign
operations;
32
Table of Contents
therefore, we do not have a foreign currency exchange risk. Our business is sensitive
to commodity prices and is most affected by changes in purchased water and purchased power costs.
Historically, the CPUCs balancing account or offsetable expense procedures allowed for increases
in purchased water and purchased power costs to be passed on to consumers. Traditionally, a
significant percentage of our net income and cash flows comes from California regulated
operations; therefore the CPUCs actions have a significant impact on our business. See Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies -Expense Balancing and Memorandum Accounts and Regulatory
Matters.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(c) under
the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that
any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to
apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and our CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures for the period ended September 30, 2009. Based on that
evaluation, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
(b) Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
33
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Groundwater Contamination Matters
As previously reported, in 1995, the State of Californias Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) named us as a potential responsible party for cleanup of toxic contamination plumes, which
contain perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Chico groundwater. In
December 2002, we were named along with other defendants in two lawsuits filed by DTSC for the
cleanup of the plumes. In 2007, we entered into Court approved consent decrees (Consent Decrees).
In connection with these suits, our insurance carrier, Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau) filed
a separate lawsuit against us for reimbursement of past defense costs which approximate $1.5
million and a declaratory determination of coverage. On June 23, 2009, we executed a confidential
settlement with Wausau that did not significantly impact our financial statements.
Other Groundwater Contamination
The Company has been and is involved in litigation against third parties to recover past and future
costs related to ground water contamination in our service areas. The cost of litigation is
expensed as incurred and any settlement is first offset against such costs. Any settlement in
excess of the cost to litigate is accounted for on a case by case basis, dependant upon the nature
of the settlement.
The Company is involved in a lawsuit against major oil refineries regarding the contamination of
the ground water as a result of the gas additive MTBE. The Company entered into a partial
settlement with the defendants in April of 2008 that represent approximately 70% of the responsible
parties (as determined by the Superior Court). On October 22, 2008, the Company received $34.2
million after deducting attorneys fees and litigation expenses. The Company is aggressively
pursuing legal action against the remaining responsible parties. The Company has filed with the
Commission to determine the appropriate regulatory treatment of the proceeds. It anticipates that
the proceeds will have been used by the Company on MTBE capital investments. The Company has also
filed with the Internal Revenue Service a request for a private letter ruling, regarding the
taxability of the re-investment of proceeds. When an agreement is reached with the Commission
regarding the regulatory treatment, or when the taxability is determined based upon proceedings
with the Internal Revenue Service, the Company will adjust the accounting of the settlement,
accordingly.
As previously reported, Company has filed with the City of Bakersfield, in the Superior Court of
California, a lawsuit that names potentially responsible parties, who manufactured and distributed
products containing 1,2,3 trichloropropane (TCP) in California. TCP has been detected in the ground
water. The lawsuit seeks to recover treatment costs necessary to remove TCP. The Court has now
coordinated our action with other water purveyor cases (TCP Cases JCCP 4435) in San Bernardino
County. No trial date has yet been set. Company has entered into a settlement with one of the
distributor defendants, FMC Corporation. Company will record the proceeds in a memorandum account
until the Commission approves an allocation between ratepayers and shareholders.
The Company has filed in San Mateo County Superior Court a Complaint (California Water Service
Company v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al. CIV 473093) against potentially responsible parties
that manufactured and distributed products, which contained perchloroethylene, also know as
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in California, to recover the past, present, and future treatment costs.
The case has not been consolidated with other PCE cases. Discovery is underway. No trial date has
yet been set.
Other Legal Matters
On October 14, 2009, Victor Guerrero and Hortencia Guerrero filed a Complaint in Solano County
Superior Court: Victor Guerrero and Hortencia Guerrero v. California Water Service Company, Case
No. FCSo34481. The Complaint for wrongful death seeks damages for negligence for failure to
maintain the water system, negligence for failure to warn, negligence and intentional concealment
causes of actions. The Company does not believe it has any liability in this matter and tendered
the lawsuit to its insurance carrier.
From time to time, the Company has been named as a co-defendant in several asbestos related
lawsuits. The Company has been dismissed without prejudice in several of these cases. In other
cases, our contractors and/or our insurance policy carriers have settled the cases with no
significant impact on our financial statements.
34
Table of Contents
From time to time, the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise in
the ordinary course of business. We review the status of each significant matter and assess its
potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount of the range of loss can be estimated, we accrue a liability for
the estimated loss in accordance with the accounting standards for contingencies. Legal
proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of
such uncertainties, accruals are based on the best information available at the time. While the
outcome of these disputes and litigation matters cannot be predicted with any certainty, management
does not believe that when taking into account existing reserves that the ultimate resolution of
these matters will materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
35
Table of Contents
Item 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit | Description | |
10.1
|
Unsecured Credit Agreement dated as of October 27, 2009 among California Water Service Group and certain of it subsidiaries from time to time, as borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager, CoBank, ACB and Bank of China, Los Angeles Branch, as co-syndication agents, Compass Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, as co-documentation agents, and the other lender parties thereto (Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K of the registrant dated October 27, 2009). | |
10.2
|
Unsecured Credit Agreement dated as of October 27, 2009 among California Water Service Company, as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager, CoBank, ACB and Bank of China, Los Angeles Branch, as co-syndication agents, Compass Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, as co-documentation agents, and the other lender parties thereto (Exhibit 10.2 to the current report on Form 8-K of the registrant dated October 27, 2009). | |
10.3
|
Water Supply Contract between the City and County of San Francisco and wholesale customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County and Santa Clara County for a term of twenty-five years beginning on July 1, 2009 and ending on June 30, 2034. The agreement was dated June 24, 2009. | |
10.4
|
Water Supply Contract dated July 1, 2009 between the City and County of San Francisco and California Water Service Company to provide water to Bear Gulch and Bayshore service areas for a term of twenty-five years beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2034. | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 |
36
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
November 9, 2009 |
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP Registrant |
|||
By: | /s/ Martin A. Kropelnicki | |||
Martin A. Kropelnicki | ||||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
37
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | Description | |
10.1
|
Unsecured Credit Agreement dated as of October 27, 2009 among California Water Service Group and certain of it subsidiaries from time to time, as borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager, CoBank, ACB and Bank of China, Los Angeles Branch, as co-syndication agents, Compass Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, as co-documentation agents, and the other lender parties thereto (Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K of the registrant dated October 27, 2009). | |
10.2
|
Unsecured Credit Agreement dated as of October 27, 2009 among California Water Service Company, as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager, CoBank, ACB and Bank of China, Los Angeles Branch, as co-syndication agents, Compass Bank and U.S. Bank National Association, as co-documentation agents, and the other lender parties thereto (Exhibit 10.2 to the current report on Form 8-K of the registrant dated October 27, 2009). | |
10.3
|
Water Supply Contract between the City and County of San Francisco and wholesale customers in Alameda County, San Mateo County and Santa Clara County for a term of twenty-five years beginning on July 1, 2009 and ending on June 30, 2034. The agreement was dated June 24, 2009. | |
10.4
|
Water Supply Contract dated July 1, 2009 between the City and County of San Francisco and California Water Service Company to provide water to Bear Gulch and Bayshore service areas for a term of twenty-five years beginning July 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2034. | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 |
38