10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on May 11, 2009
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13883
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 77-0448994 | |
(State or other jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer identification No.) | |
of incorporation or organization) | ||
1720 North First Street, San Jose, CA. | 95112 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
408-367-8200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. Common shares outstanding as of May 1, 2009 20,744,952
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this filing on Form 10-Q have been
prepared by management and are unaudited.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | 1,605,014 | $ | 1,583,079 | ||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(482,235 | ) | (470,712 | ) | ||||
Net utility plant |
1,122,779 | 1,112,367 | ||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
5,278 | 13,869 | ||||||
Receivables: |
||||||||
Customers |
18,216 | 22,786 | ||||||
Regulatory balancing accounts |
8,860 | 4,629 | ||||||
Other |
10,146 | 7,442 | ||||||
Unbilled revenue |
12,472 | 13,112 | ||||||
Materials and supplies at average cost |
5,068 | 5,070 | ||||||
Taxes, prepaid expenses and other assets |
12,265 | 12,890 | ||||||
Total current assets |
72,305 | 79,798 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Regulatory assets |
198,170 | 198,293 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,906 | 3,906 | ||||||
Other assets |
25,148 | 23,743 | ||||||
Total other assets |
227,224 | 225,942 | ||||||
$ | 1,422,308 | $ | 1,418,107 | |||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value |
$ | 207 | $ | 207 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
214,236 | 213,922 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
185,128 | 188,820 | ||||||
Total common stockholders equity |
399,571 | 402,949 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
287,202 | 287,498 | ||||||
Total capitalization |
686,773 | 690,447 | ||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
2,891 | 2,818 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
52,000 | 40,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable: |
||||||||
Trade and other |
36,153 | 39,187 | ||||||
Regulatory balancing accounts |
1,835 | 2,585 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
6,757 | 3,295 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
30,438 | 35,311 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
130,074 | 123,196 | ||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
2,392 | 2,392 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
74,283 | 72,344 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than pensions |
150,074 | 152,685 | ||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
83,234 | 83,312 | ||||||
Advances for construction |
177,684 | 176,163 | ||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
117,794 | 117,568 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
$ | 1,422,308 | $ | 1,418,107 | |||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Unaudited
(In thousands, except per share data)
(In thousands, except per share data)
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
For the three months ended | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 86,613 | $ | 72,921 | ||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Water production costs |
28,868 | 25,358 | ||||||
Administrative and general |
18,861 | 13,418 | ||||||
Other operations |
12,456 | 12,065 | ||||||
Maintenance |
4,635 | 4,114 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,198 | 9,222 | ||||||
Income taxes |
1,232 | 174 | ||||||
Property and other taxes |
4,088 | 3,739 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
80,338 | 68,090 | ||||||
Net operating income |
6,275 | 4,831 | ||||||
Other income and expenses: |
||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
2,881 | 2,905 | ||||||
Non-regulated expenses |
(2,641 | ) | (3,036 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
603 | | ||||||
Income taxes benefit (expense) on other income and expenses |
(338 | ) | 49 | |||||
Total other income and expenses |
505 | (82 | ) | |||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
5,038 | 5,014 | ||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
(679 | ) | (450 | ) | ||||
Total interest expense |
4,359 | 4,564 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,421 | $ | 185 | ||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||
Basic |
20,730 | 20,688 | ||||||
Diluted |
20,759 | 20,711 | ||||||
Dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 0.2950 | $ | 0.2925 | ||||
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Unaudited
(In thousands)
(In thousands)
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
For the three months ended: |
||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,421 | $ | 185 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,792 | 9,222 | ||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
(603 | ) | | |||||
Change in value of life insurance contracts |
(8 | ) | | |||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
(486 | ) | (407 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Receivables |
(2,372 | ) | 4,475 | |||||
Accounts payable |
1,543 | (2,906 | ) | |||||
Other current assets |
1,280 | 631 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
(1,152 | ) | 5,061 | |||||
Other changes, net |
63 | 981 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
11,478 | 17,242 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Utility plant expenditures: |
||||||||
Company funded |
(23,529 | ) | (27,090 | ) | ||||
Developer advances and contributions in aid of construction |
(1,475 | ) | (2,735 | ) | ||||
Purchase of life insurance |
(1,373 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds on sale of non-utility property |
671 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(25,706 | ) | (29,825 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 14,000 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(483 | ) | (724 | ) | ||||
Advances and contributions in aid of construction |
1,269 | 3,085 | ||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
(1,035 | ) | (1,452 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(6,114 | ) | (6,093 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
5,637 | 8,816 | ||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(8,591 | ) | (3,767 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
13,869 | 6,734 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 5,278 | $ | 2,967 | ||||
Supplemental information |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 729 | $ | 670 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
| | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Accrued payables for investments in utility plant |
$ | 5,641 | $ | 4,050 | ||||
Utility plant contribution by developers |
2,747 | |
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
March 31, 2009
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Note 1. Organization and Operations and Basis of Presentation
California Water Service Group (the Company) is a holding company that provides water utility and
other related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. California Water Service Company (Cal Water), Washington Water Service Company
(Washington Water), New Mexico Water Service Company (New Mexico Water), and Hawaii Water Service
Company, Inc. (Hawaii Water) provide regulated utility services under the rules and regulations
of their respective states regulatory commissions (jointly referred to herein as the
Commissions). CWS Utility Services and HWS Utility Services LLC provide non-regulated water
utility and utility-related services.
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim financial information has been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial
information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and therefore do not contain all of
the information and footnotes required by GAAP and the SEC for annual financial statements. The
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in its current
report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on April 7, 2009.
The preparation of the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet
dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect all adjustments that are necessary to provide a fair presentation of the results for the
periods covered. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
for any future period.
Due to the seasonal nature of the water business, the results for interim periods are not
indicative of the results for a twelve-month period. Revenue and income are generally higher in
the warm, dry summer months when water usage and sales are greater. Revenue and income are lower
in the winter months when cooler temperatures and rainfall curtail water usage and sales.
The Company operates primarily in one business segment providing water and related utility
services.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue
Revenue includes monthly cycle customer billings for regulated water and wastewater services at
rates authorized by regulatory commissions and billings to certain non-regulated customers. In
addition, effective July 1, 2008 with the adoption of the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism
(WRAM) and the Modified Cost Balancing Account (MCBA), Cal Water records the difference between
what is billed to its regulated customers and that which is authorized by the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC).
Under the WRAM, Cal Water records the adopted level of volumetric revenues as authorized by the
CPUC for metered accounts (adopted volumetric revenues). In addition to volumetric-based
revenues, the revenue requirements approved by the CPUC include service charges, flat rate
charges, and other items that are not subject to the WRAM. The adopted volumetric revenue
considers the seasonality of consumption of water based upon historical averages. The variance
between adopted volumetric revenues and actual billed volumetric revenues for metered accounts is
recorded as a component of revenue with an offsetting entry to a current asset or liability
balancing account (tracked individually for each Cal Water district). The variance amount may be
positive or negative and represents amounts that will be billed or refunded to customers in the
future.
Under the MCBA Cal Water will track adopted expense levels for purchased water, purchased power
and pump taxes, as established by the CPUC. Variances (which include the effects of changes in
both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power, and pump tax
expenses are recorded as a component of revenue, as the amount of such
6
Table of Contents
variances will be recovered from or refunded to the Companys customers at a later date. This is
reflected with an offsetting entry to a current asset or liability balancing account (tracked
individually for each Cal Water district).
The balances in the WRAM and MCBA assets and liabilities accounts will fluctuate on a monthly
basis depending upon the variance between adopted and actual results. The recovery or refund of
the WRAM is netted against the MCBA over- or under-recovery for the corresponding district and is
interest bearing at the current 90 day commercial paper rate. When the net amount for any
district achieves a pre-determined level at the end of any calendar year (i.e., at least 2.5
percent over- or under-recovery of the approved revenue requirement), Cal Water will file with
the CPUC to refund or collect the balance in the accounts. Account balances less than those
levels may be refunded or collected in Cal Waters general rate case proceedings or aggregated
with future calendar year balances for comparison with the recovery level. As of March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the net aggregated asset included in accounts receivable was $8,860 and
$4,629, respectively, and the aggregate liability included in accounts payable was $1,835 and
$2,585, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. The statement applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after years
beginning after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141(R) significantly changes current practices regarding
business combinations. Among the more significant changes, SFAS 141(R) expands the definition of
a business and a business combination; requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests (including goodwill), measured at fair value at
the acquisition date; requires acquisition-related expenses and restructuring costs to be
recognized separately from the business combination and requires assets acquired and liabilities
assumed from contractual and non-contractual contingencies to be recognized at their acquisition
date fair values with subsequent changes recognized in earnings. The Company adopted SFAS No. 141
(R) effective January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51. the statement amends ARB 51 to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The statement is effective for years beginning after December
15, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 effective January 1, 2009, and it did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB staff revisited Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issue No. 03-6 and
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Shared-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities. FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires
unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive nonrefundable dividends to also
be considered participating securities, as defined in EITF 03-6.
The Company currently grants certain unvested share-based payments awards that include
rights to dividends similar to common stockholders. The Company adopted FSP EITF 03-6-1
effective January 1, 2009 and it did not have a material impact to its computation of earnings
per share.
Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1,Employers Disclosures about Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets (FSP 132(R)-1). FSP 132(R)-1 amends and expands the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 132. An entity is required to provide qualitative disclosures about how
investment allocation decisions are made, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the
fair value of plan assets, and the concentration of risk within plan assets. Additionally,
quantitative disclosures are required showing the fair value of each major category of plan
assets, the levels in which each asset is classified within the fair value hierarchy, and a
reconciliation for the period of plan assets which are measured using significant unobservable
inputs. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective prospectively for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FSP 132(R)-1.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1). This FSP amends SFAS No.
107 and APB Opinion No. 28. Interim Financial Reporting to require disclosures about the fair
value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods that were previously only required
for annual reporting periods. An entity is required to disclose the fair value of financial
assets and liabilities together with the related carrying amount and where the carrying amount is
classified in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 is
effective prospectively for interim reporting periods after June 15, 2009. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB No. 28-1.
7
Table of Contents
Note 3. Stock-based Compensation
Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Company had a stockholder-approved Long-Term Incentive Plan (which was replaced on April 27,
2005, by a stockholder-approved Equity Incentive Plan) that allowed granting of non-qualified
stock options. The Company had accounted for options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan
using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees. All outstanding options (83,250 shares at March 31, 2009) have an
exercise price equal to the market price on the date they were granted. The weighted average
price of the options is $24.90. All options granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan are fully
vested. No compensation expense was recorded for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 related to stock options issued under the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Equity Incentive Plan
Under the Companys Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by shareholders in April 2005, the
Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. In the first quarters of
2009 and 2008, the Company granted Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) of 21,000 and 16,630 shares,
respectively, of common stock both to officers and to directors of the Company. Employee options
vest ratably over 48 months, while director options vest at the end of 12 months. The shares were
valued at $38.38 and $37.60 per share, respectively, based upon the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant.
In addition, in the first quarters of 2009 and 2008, Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) equivalent
to 71,500 and 47,070 shares, respectively, were granted to officers, which vest ratably over 48
months and expire at the end of 10 years. The grant-date fair value for SARs was determined using
the Black Scholes model, which arrived at a fair value of $10.50 and $6.03 per share,
respectively. Upon exercise of a SAR, the appreciation is payable in common shares of the
Company.
The assumptions utilized in calculation of the SAR fair value were:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Expected dividend yield |
3.06 | % | 3.11 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
36.97 | % | 21.96 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.89 | % | 2.63 | % | ||||
Expected holding period in years |
6.0 | 6.0 |
The Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in the expense computation relating to RSAs and SARs
issued to officers as they vest monthly and, as a result, the expense is recorded for actual
vesting during the period. For outside directors the Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in
the expense computation relating to RSAs, as the Company expects 100% to vest at the end of
twelve months.
The table below reflects SARs activity under the Equity Incentive Plan for the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
108,710 | $ | 38.16 | |||||
Granted |
71,500 | 38.38 | ||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||
Cancelled |
| | ||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
180,210 | $ | 38.25 | |||||
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
53,100 | $ | 38.39 | |||||
The Company has recorded compensation costs for the RSAs and SARs in Operating Expense in the
amount of $284 and $91 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and March 31, 2008, respectively.
Note 4. Earnings Per Share Calculations
The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share are noted below. RSAs are included in
the weighted stock outstanding as the shares have all the same voting and dividend rights as
issued and unrestricted common stock. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted into common stock.
8
Table of Contents
The SARs outstanding of 180,210 and 108,710 are anti-dilutive for the first quarter of 2009 and
2008. All options are dilutive and the dilutive effect is shown in the table below.
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,421 | $ | 185 | ||||
Less preferred dividends |
| (38 | ) | |||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 2,421 | $ | 147 | ||||
Weighted average common shares, basic |
20,730 | 20,688 | ||||||
Dilutive common stock options (treasury method) |
29 | 23 | ||||||
Shares used for dilutive computation |
20,759 | 20,711 | ||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.01 | ||||
Note 5. Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides a qualified, defined-benefit, non-contributory pension plan for
substantially all employees. The Company makes annual contributions to fund the amounts accrued
for the qualified pension plan. The Company also maintains an unfunded, non-qualified,
supplemental executive retirement plan. The costs of the plans are charged to expense or are
capitalized in utility plant as appropriate.
The Company offers medical, dental, vision, and life insurance benefits for retirees and their
spouses and dependents. Participants are required to pay a premium, which offsets a portion of
the cost.
Cash payments by the Company related to pension plans and other postretirement benefits were
$11,588 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The estimated cash contribution to the pension
plans for 2009 is $26,900. The estimated contribution to the other benefits plan for 2009 is
$9,500.
The following table lists components of the pension plans and other postretirement benefits. The
data listed under pension plan includes the qualified pension plan and the non-qualified
supplemental executive retirement plan. The data listed under other benefits is for all other
postretirement benefits.
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Plan | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2,206 | $ | 1,336 | $ | 504 | $ | 361 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
3,018 | 1,628 | 518 | 433 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(1,707 | ) | (1,578 | ) | (185 | ) | (156 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized net initial APBO (1) |
N/A | N/A | 69 | 69 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
1,533 | 468 | 29 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
461 | 81 | 199 | 75 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 5,511 | $ | 1,935 | $ | 1,134 | $ | 811 | ||||||||
(1) | APBO Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
Note 6. Short-term Borrowings
At March 31, 2009, the Company maintained a bank line of credit providing unsecured borrowings of
up to $20 million at the prime lending rate less 1.5 percentage points. Cal Water maintained a
separate bank line of credit for an additional $55 million with the same interest rate provision
as the Company. The line of credit agreements expire on April 30, 2012. The agreement with the
Company requires a debt to capitalization ratio of less than 0.667:1.0 and an interest coverage
ratio of at least 2.5:1.0. As of March 31, 2009, the Company and Cal Water were in compliance
with the bank covenants in the loan agreements. At March 31, 2009, the outstanding borrowings on
the Company line of credit were $12,000 and the outstanding borrowings on the Cal Water line of
credit were $40,000. See also Note 8 (subsequent events).
9
Table of Contents
Note 7. Commitment and Contingencies
Commitments
The Company has significant commitments to lease certain office spaces and water systems, and for
the purchase of water from water wholesalers. These commitments are described in footnote 15 of
the current report on Form 8-K.
Contingencies
Chico Groundwater/Wausau Insurance Matter
In 1995, the State of Californias Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) named us as a
potential responsible party for cleanup of toxic contamination plumes, which contain
perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Chico groundwater. In December
2002, we were named along with other defendants in two lawsuits filed by DTSC for the cleanup of
the plumes. In 2007, we entered into Court approved consent decrees (Consent Decrees). The
Consent Decrees conditioned our performance upon many factors, including, but not limited to,
water pumped and treated by us must meet regulatory standards so we may distribute to its
customers. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decrees, we will incur capital costs of $1.5
million and future operating costs with a present value of approximately $2.6 million. In our
2007 general rate case (GRC) settlement negotiations, Division of Ratepayer Advocates have
tentatively agreed to track all costs associated with the Consent Decrees, including legal costs
to pursue insurance coverage, for potential future recovery in rates.
In connection with these suits, our insurance carrier, Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau)
filed a separate lawsuit against us for reimbursement of past defense costs which approximate
$1.5 million and a declaratory determination of coverage. On January 23, 2008, the Court heard
various parties motions and on September 25, 2008 issued its rulings that Wausau had a duty to
defend; therefore, the Company will not have to reimburse Wausau for previously incurred defense
costs. The Court did not find Wausaus actions were intended to harm the Company, so punitive
damages will not be recoverable by the Company. However, the Court also found that the issue of
policy coverage will be determined at trial. A trial date has been set for May 26, 2009. Based on
the Courts rulings, the Company has not recorded any liability associated with reimbursement of
costs to defend and expensing the related costs as incurred. The
Company continues to believe that the
claims are covered under the insurance policies. However, if the Companys claim is ultimately found to be
excludable under the insurance policies, the Company believes that recovery of costs associated
with the Consent Decrees are probable from either its equitable indemnity lawsuit against
manufacturers and distributors of perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene, (PCE) in
California; or through rate increases in the future. Therefore, no accrual or contingency has
been recorded for this matter.
Other Groundwater Contamination
The Company has been and is involved in litigation against third parties to recover past and
future costs related to ground water contamination in our service areas. The cost of litigation is
expensed as incurred and any settlement is first offset against such costs. Any settlement in
excess of the cost to litigate is accounted for on a case by case basis based upon the nature of
the settlement. It is anticipated that the majority of the settlement will be reflected as a
benefit to the rate payers by offsetting future operating or capital costs.
The Company is involved in a lawsuit against major oil refineries regarding the contamination of
the ground water as a result of the gas additive MTBE. The Company entered into a partial
settlement with the defendants in April of 2008 that represent approximately 70% of the
responsible parties (as determined by the Superior Court). Based on the allocation matrix, on
October 22, 2008, the Company received $34.2 million after deducting attorneys fees and
litigation expenses. The Company is aggressively pursuing legal action against the remaining
responsible parties. The Company is in the process of determining with the Commission the
appropriate regulatory treatment of the proceeds. It is anticipated that the proceeds will be
used by the Company on infrastructure improvements. The Company is in the process of filing with
the Internal Revenue Service a request for a private letter ruling regarding the taxability of the
proceeds.
The Company believes the proceeds are non-taxable based upon its intent to reinvest them in
qualifying assets. In 2009, when an agreement is reached with the Commission regarding the
regulatory treatment, or when the taxability is determined based upon proceedings with the
Internal Revenue Service, the Company will adjust the accounting of the settlement accordingly.
As previously reported, Cal Water has filed with the City of Bakersfield, in the Superior Court of
California, a lawsuit that names potentially responsible parties, who manufactured and distributed
products containing 1,2,3 trichloropropane (TCP) in California. TCP has been detected in the
ground water. The lawsuit seeks to recover treatment costs necessary
to remove TCP. The Court has now coordinated our action with other water purveyor cases (TCP Cases JCCP 4435) in San Bernardino
County. No trial date has yet been set.
The Company has filed in San Mateo County Superior Court a complaint (California Water Service
Company v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al. CIV 473093) against potentially responsible parties
that manufactured and distributed products, which contained perchloroethylene, also know as
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in California, to recover the past, present, and future treatment costs.
No trial date has yet been set.
Other Legal Matters
From time to time,
the Company has been named as a co-defendant in several asbestos related
lawsuits. The Company has been dismissed without prejudice in several of these cases. In other
cases our contractors and our insurance policy carriers have settled the cases with no
effect on the Companys financial statements. As such the Company does not currently believe that there is any
potential loss which is probable of occurring related to these matters and therefore no accrual
or contingency has been recorded.
From time to time, the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise
in the ordinary course of business. We review the status of each significant matter and assess its
potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount of the range of loss can be estimated, the Company accrues a liability
for the estimated loss in accordance with SFAS No 5, Accounting of Contingencies. Legal
proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of
such uncertainties, accruals are based on the best information available at the time. While the
outcome of these disputes and litigation matters cannot be predicted with any certainty,
management does not believe that when taking into account existing reserves that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will materially affect our financial position, results of operations,
or cash flows.
Note 8. Subsequent events
On April 17, 2009, the Companys and Cal Waters loan agreements with Bank of America, N.A. were
amended so that the interest rate payable on outstanding borrowings is equal to the banks prime
rate minus 0.75 percentage points or the LIBOR rate plus 1.0 percentage point. Additionally, the
Company and Cal Water agreed to a fee of 0.15% based upon any unused
commitment. The amendment also changed the
expiration date to April 16, 2010.
On April 17, 2009, Cal Water completed the sale and issuance of $100 million aggregate
principal amount of its 5.875% First Mortgage Bonds due 2019, which are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Company. Pursuant to the note purchase agreements and supplements thereto
under which Cal Waters outstanding unsecured senior notes had been issued, Cal Water was
required to issue a new series of first mortgage bonds in exchange for each outstanding series of
unsecured senior notes with a like aggregate principal amount. The offering triggered this
exchange provision. Accordingly, upon the closing of the offering, Cal Water was required to
issue an additional series of first mortgage bonds under the mortgage indenture with a like
aggregate principal amount to the holders of each series of its outstanding unsecured senior
notes in exchange for each such series of notes.
In connection with the offering, Cal Water exercised its option to redeem the remaining $3.0
million of 8.86% Series J First Mortgage Bonds due 2023, which Cal Water assumed in connection
with its acquisition of Dominguez Water Corporation in 2000. The redemption was affected pursuant
to the terms of the indenture and supplemental indentures governing the Series J bonds. The
Series J bonds were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal
amount of the Series J bonds plus a make-whole premium of $1.0 million, and accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of redemption.
10
Table of Contents
Note 9. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
As discussed in Note 8, Cal Water issued on April 17, 2009, $100 million aggregate principal amount
of 5.875% First Mortgage Bonds due 2019, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by
California Water Service Group (Parent Company). The following tables present the condensed
consolidating statements of income of California Water Service Group (Guarantor and Parent), Cal
Water (issuer and wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of California Water Service Group) and other
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
the condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the
three-months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The
information is presented utilizing the equity method of accounting for investments in consolidating
subsidiaries.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of March 31, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of March 31, 2009
(In thousands)
Parent | All Other | Consolidating | ||||||||||||||||||
Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | | $ | 1,508,729 | $ | 103,484 | $ | (7,199 | ) | $ | 1,605,014 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (461,784 | ) | (21,478 | ) | 1,027 | (482,235 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net utility plant |
| 1,046,945 | 82,006 | (6,172 | ) | 1,122,779 | ||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
356 | 2,889 | 2,033 | | 5,278 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables and unbilled revenue |
| 45,909 | 3,785 | | 49,694 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
16,710 | 13,794 | 3,290 | (33,794 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
250 | 17,081 | 2 | | 17,333 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
17,316 | 79,673 | 9,110 | (33,794 | ) | 72,305 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets |
905 | 196,867 | 398 | | 198,170 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
400,321 | | | (400,321 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term affiliate notes receivable |
9,168 | | | (9,168 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | 3,906 | | 3,906 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 21,660 | 3,693 | (205 | ) | 25,148 | ||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
410,394 | 218,527 | 7,997 | (409,694 | ) | 227,224 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 427,710 | $ | 1,345,145 | $ | 99,113 | $ | (449,660 | ) | $ | 1,422,308 | ||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders equity |
$ | 399,571 | $ | 369,106 | $ | 37,592 | $ | (406,698 | ) | $ | 399,571 | |||||||||
Affiliate long-term debt |
| | 9,168 | (9,168 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
| 283,550 | 3,652 | | 287,202 | |||||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
399,571 | 652,656 | 50,412 | (415,866 | ) | 686,773 | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 2,118 | 773 | | 2,891 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 40,000 | | | 52,000 | |||||||||||||||
Payables to affiliates |
14,984 | 10,637 | 8,173 | (33,794 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 33,729 | 4,259 | | 37,988 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
1,155 | 32,600 | 3,440 | | 37,195 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
28,139 | 119,084 | 16,645 | (33,794 | ) | 130,074 | ||||||||||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
| 2,392 | | | 2,392 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 71,942 | 2,341 | | 74,283 | |||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than
pensions |
| 150,074 | | | 150,074 | |||||||||||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
| 75,408 | 7,826 | | 83,234 | |||||||||||||||
Advances for construction |
| 176,156 | 1,528 | | 177,684 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
| 97,433 | 20,361 | | 117,794 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 427,710 | $ | 1,345,145 | $ | 99,113 | $ | (449,660 | ) | $ | 1,422,308 | ||||||||||
11
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
All Other | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant |
$ | | $ | 1,488,227 | $ | 102,051 | $ | (7,199 | ) | $ | 1,583,079 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| (451,350 | ) | (20,354 | ) | 992 | (470,712 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net utility plant |
| 1,036,877 | 81,697 | (6,207 | ) | 1,112,367 | ||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
427 | 3,025 | 10,417 | | 13,869 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables
and unbilled revenue |
72 | 44,049 | 3,848 | | 47,969 | |||||||||||||||
Receivables from affiliates |
9,295 | 11,976 | 372 | (21,643 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
142 | 17,877 | (59 | ) | | 17,960 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
9,936 | 76,927 | 14,578 | (21,643 | ) | 79,798 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory assets |
905 | 196,990 | 398 | | 198,293 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
404,064 | | | (404,064 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term affiliate notes receivable |
10,851 | | | (10,851 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 20,242 | 7,612 | (205 | ) | 27,649 | ||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
415,820 | 217,232 | 8,010 | (415,120 | ) | 225,942 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 425,756 | $ | 1,331,036 | $ | 104,285 | $ | (442,970 | ) | $ | 1,418,107 | ||||||||||
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalization: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders equity |
$ | 402,949 | $ | 372,337 | $ | 38,139 | $ | (410,476 | ) | $ | 402,949 | |||||||||
Affiliate long-term debt |
| | 10,851 | (10,851 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
| 283,820 | 3,678 | | 287,498 | |||||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
402,949 | 656,157 | 52,668 | (421,327 | ) | 690,447 | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 2,121 | 697 | | 2,818 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
12,000 | 28,000 | | | 40,000 | |||||||||||||||
Payables to affiliates |
9,642 | 201 | 11,800 | (21,643 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 38,003 | 3,769 | | 41,772 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
1,165 | 34,563 | 2,878 | | 38,606 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
22,807 | 102,888 | 19,144 | (21,643 | ) | 123,196 | ||||||||||||||
Unamortized investment tax credits |
| 2,392 | | | 2,392 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 70,003 | 2,341 | | 72,344 | |||||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits other than
pensions |
| 152,685 | | | 152,685 | |||||||||||||||
Regulatory and other liabilities |
| 75,362 | 7,950 | | 83,312 | |||||||||||||||
Advances for construction |
| 174,625 | 1,538 | | 176,163 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions in aid of construction |
| 96,924 | 20,644 | | 117,568 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 425,756 | $ | 1,331,036 | $ | 104,285 | $ | (442,970 | ) | $ | 1,418,107 | ||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
(In thousands)
All Other | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 80,276 | $ | 6,337 | $ | | $ | 86,613 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased water |
| 22,904 | 36 | | 22,940 | |||||||||||||||
Purchased power |
| 2,904 | 1,639 | | 4,543 | |||||||||||||||
Pump taxes |
| 1,272 | 113 | | 1,385 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 17,239 | 1,622 | | 18,861 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
| 11,031 | 1,539 | (114 | ) | 12,456 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 4,520 | 115 | | 4,635 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 9,435 | 797 | (34 | ) | 10,198 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
(25 | ) | 1,179 | (117 | ) | 195 | 1,232 | |||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes |
| 3,509 | 579 | | 4,088 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses (income) |
(25 | ) | 73,993 | 6,323 | 47 | 80,338 | ||||||||||||||
Net operating income |
25 | 6,283 | 14 | (47 | ) | 6,275 | ||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
171 | 1,957 | 1,047 | (294 | ) | 2,881 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense |
| (1,742 | ) | (899 | ) | | (2,641 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale on non-utility property |
| 598 | 5 | | 603 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on other income and expense |
(70 | ) | (331 | ) | (118 | ) | 181 | (338 | ) | |||||||||||
Net other income (expense) |
101 | 482 | 35 | (113 | ) | 505 | ||||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
61 | 4,916 | 241 | (180 | ) | 5,038 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (545 | ) | (134 | ) | | (679 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
61 | 4,371 | 107 | (180 | ) | 4,359 | ||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
2,356 | | | (2,356 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,421 | $ | 2,394 | $ | (58 | ) | $ | (2,336 | ) | $ | 2,421 | ||||||||
13
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
(In thousands)
All Other | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | | $ | 69,268 | $ | 3,653 | $ | | $ | 72,921 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased water |
| 20,650 | 61 | | 20,711 | |||||||||||||||
Purchased power |
| 2,857 | 597 | | 3,454 | |||||||||||||||
Pump taxes |
| 1,104 | 89 | | 1,193 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
| 12,374 | 1,044 | | 13,418 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
| 11,009 | 1,170 | (114 | ) | 12,065 | ||||||||||||||
Maintenance |
| 4,028 | 86 | | 4,114 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 8,773 | 485 | (36 | ) | 9,222 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
(13 | ) | 228 | (126 | ) | 85 | 174 | |||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes |
| 3,413 | 326 | | 3,739 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses (income) |
(13 | ) | 64,436 | 3,732 | (65 | ) | 68,090 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income |
13 | 4,832 | (79 | ) | 65 | 4,831 | ||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-regulated revenue |
58 | 1,957 | 1,062 | (172 | ) | 2,905 | ||||||||||||||
Non-regulated expense |
| (2,225 | ) | (811 | ) | | (3,036 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) on
other income and expense |
(21 | ) | 108 | (106 | ) | 68 | 49 | |||||||||||||
Net other income (expense ) |
37 | (160 | ) | 145 | (104 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| 4,943 | 129 | (58 | ) | 5,014 | ||||||||||||||
Less: capitalized interest |
| (450 | ) | | | (450 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
| 4,493 | 129 | (58 | ) | 4,564 | ||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
135 | | | (135 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 185 | $ | 179 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (116 | ) | $ | 185 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
(In thousands)
All Other | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,421 | $ | 2,394 | $ | (58 | ) | $ | (2,336 | ) | $ | 2,421 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
(2,356 | ) | | | 2,356 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends received from affiliates |
6,114 | | | (6,114 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 9,972 | 854 | (34 | ) | 10,792 | ||||||||||||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
| (363 | ) | (123 | ) | | (486 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in value of life insurance contracts |
| (8 | ) | | | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale of non-utility property |
| (598 | ) | (5 | ) | | (603 | ) | ||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net advance to affiliates |
(509 | ) | 8,600 | (8,091 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other changes, net |
306 | (1,454 | ) | 496 | 14 | (638 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
5,976 | 18,543 | (6,927 | ) | (6,114 | ) | 11,478 | |||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant expenditures:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Company funded |
| (22,773 | ) | (756 | ) | | (23,529 | ) | ||||||||||||
Developer advances and contributions in aid of
construction |
| (1,475 | ) | | | (1,475 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of non-utility assets |
| 666 | 5 | | 671 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from affiliates long-term debt |
67 | | | (67 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Purchase of life insurance |
| (1,373 | ) | | | (1,373 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
67 | (24,955 | ) | (751 | ) | (67 | ) | (25,706 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| 12,000 | | | 12,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (272 | ) | (211 | ) | | (483 | ) | ||||||||||||
Repayment of affiliates long-term debt |
| | (67 | ) | 67 | | ||||||||||||||
Advances and contributions in aid for construction |
| 1,198 | 71 | | 1,269 | |||||||||||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
| (1,025 | ) | (10 | ) | | (1,035 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid to non-affiliates |
(6,114 | ) | | | | (6,114 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to affiliates |
| (5,625 | ) | (489 | ) | 6,114 | | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
(6,114 | ) | 6,276 | (706 | ) | 6,181 | 5,637 | |||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(71 | ) | (136 | ) | (8,384 | ) | | (8,591 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
427 | 3,025 | 10,417 | | 13,869 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 356 | $ | 2,889 | $ | 2,033 | $ | | $ | 5,278 | ||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
(In thousands)
All Other | Consolidating | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent Company | Cal Water | Subsidiaries | Adjustments | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 185 | $ | 179 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (116 | ) | $ | 185 | ||||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings of subsidiaries |
(135 | ) | | | 135 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends received from affiliates |
6,093 | | | (6,093 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 8,773 | 485 | (36 | ) | 9,222 | ||||||||||||||
Other changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
| (1,525 | ) | 1,118 | | (407 | ) | |||||||||||||
Changes in values of life insurance contracts |
| 749 | | | 749 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net advance to affiliates |
4,736 | (4,208 | ) | (528 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Other changes, net |
(5,580 | ) | 10,920 | 2,136 | 17 | 7,493 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
5,299 | 14,888 | 3,148 | (6,093 | ) | 17,242 | ||||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Utility plant expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Company funded |
| (25,806 | ) | (1,284 | ) | | (27,090 | ) | ||||||||||||
Developer advances and contributions in aid of
construction |
| (1,870 | ) | (865 | ) | | (2,735 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loans to affiliates |
95 | | | (95 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
95 | (27,676 | ) | (2,149 | ) | (95 | ) | (29,825 | ) | |||||||||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| 14,000 | | | 14,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (537 | ) | (187 | ) | | (724 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from affiliate loan |
| | 95 | (95 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Advances and contributions in aid of construction |
| 2,018 | 1,067 | | 3,085 | |||||||||||||||
Refunds of advances for construction |
| (1,348 | ) | (104 | ) | | (1,452 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid to non-affiliates |
(6,093 | ) | | | | (6,093 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to affiliates |
| (5,785 | ) | (308 | ) | 6,093 | | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
(6,093 | ) | 8,348 | 373 | 6,188 | 8,816 | ||||||||||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
(699 | ) | (4,440 | ) | 1,372 | | (3,767 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
2,718 | 2,631 | 1,385 | | 6,734 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 2,019 | $ | (1,809 | ) | $ | 2,757 | $ | | $ | 2,967 | |||||||||
16
Table of Contents
Item 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except where otherwise noted and per share amounts)
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except where otherwise noted and per share amounts)
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report, including all documents incorporated by reference, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning established by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (Act). Forward-looking statements in this quarterly report are based on
currently available information, expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections, and our
managements beliefs, assumptions, judgments and expectations about us, the water utility
industry and general economic conditions. These statements are not statements of historical fact.
When used in our documents, statements that are not historical in nature, including words like
expects, intends, plans, believes, may, estimates, assumes, anticipates,
projects, predicts, forecasts, should, seeks, or variations of these words or similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
are not guarantees of future performance. They are based on numerous assumptions that we believe
are reasonable, but they are open to a wide range of uncertainties and business risks.
Consequently, actual results may vary materially from what is contained in a forward-looking
statement.
Factors which may cause actual results to be different than those expected or anticipated
include, but are not limited to:
| governmental and regulatory commissions decisions, including decisions on proper disposition of property; | ||
| changes in regulatory commissions policies and procedures; | ||
| the timeliness of regulatory commissions actions concerning rate relief; | ||
| changes in the capital markets and access to sufficient capital on satisfactory terms; | ||
| new legislation; | ||
| changes in accounting valuations and estimates; | ||
| changes in accounting treatment for regulated companies, including adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, if required; | ||
| electric power interruptions; | ||
| increases in suppliers prices and the availability of supplies including water and power; | ||
| fluctuations in interest rates; | ||
| changes in environmental compliance and water quality requirements; | ||
| acquisitions and the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies; | ||
| the ability to successfully implement business plans; | ||
| civil disturbances or terrorist threats or acts, or apprehension about the possible future occurrences of acts of this type; | ||
| the involvement of the United States in war or other hostilities; | ||
| our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; | ||
| labor relations matters as we negotiate with the unions; |
17
Table of Contents
| implementation of new information technology systems; | ||
| restrictive covenants in or changes to the credit ratings on current or future debt that could increase financing costs or affect the ability to borrow, make payments on debt, or pay dividends; | ||
| general economic conditions, including changes in customer growth patterns and our ability to collect billed revenue from customers; | ||
| changes in customer water use patterns and the effects of conservation; | ||
| the impact of weather on water sales and operating results; | ||
| the ability to satisfy requirements related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations on internal controls; and | ||
| the risks set forth in Risk Factors included elsewhere in this annual report. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, investors are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly
report or as of the date of any document incorporated by reference in this report, as applicable.
When considering forward-looking statements, investors should keep in mind the cautionary
statements in this quarterly report and the documents incorporated by reference. We are not under
any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We maintain our accounting records in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (GAAP) and as directed by the regulatory commissions to which we are
subject. The process of preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use
of estimates and assumptions on the part of management. The estimates and assumptions used by
management are based on historical experience and our understanding of current facts and
circumstances. Management believes that the following accounting policies are critical because
they involve a higher degree of complexity and judgment, and can have a material impact on our
results of operations and financial condition. These policies and their key characteristics are
discussed in detail in the 2008 Form 10-K. They include:
| revenue recognition; | ||
| expense balancing and memorandum accounts; | ||
| modified cost balancing accounts; | ||
| regulatory utility accounting; | ||
| income taxes; | ||
| pension benefits; | ||
| workers compensation, general liability and other claims; and | ||
| contingencies |
For the period ended March 31, 2009, there were no changes in the methodology for computing
critical accounting estimates, no additional accounting estimates met the standards for critical
accounting policies, and there were no material changes to the important assumptions underlying
the critical accounting estimates.
18
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF FIRST QUARTER 2009 OPERATIONS COMPARED TO
FIRST QUARTER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except share data
FIRST QUARTER 2008 OPERATIONS
Amounts in thousands except share data
Overview
First quarter net income was $2.4 million equivalent to $0.12 per common share diluted compared
to net income of $0.2 million or $0.01 common per share on a diluted basis in the first quarter
of 2008. The increase in net income is primarily attributable to the increase in revenue due to
rate increases from the 2007 General Rate Case, effective July 1, 2008. While we had a decline
in customer usage of water due to the unfavorable weather, the impact was offset by the net
increase in revenue from the WRAM and MCBA.
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased $13.7 million or 19% to $86.6 million in the first quarter of 2009.
As disclosed in the following table, the increase was due to increases in rates and usage by new
customers primarily from our acquisitions in Hawaii last year. The decrease in usage by existing
customers was offset by revenue recognized from the WRAM.
The factors that impacted the operating revenue for the first quarter of 2009 compared to 2008
are presented in the following table:
Rate increases |
$ | 11,586 | ||
Net revenue increase due to WRAM and MCBA |
4,983 | |||
Decrease in usage by existing customers and other |
(5,306 | ) | ||
Usage by new customers |
2,429 | |||
Net operating revenue increase |
$ | 13,692 | ||
The components of the rate increases are listed in the following table:
General Rate Case (GRC) Increases |
$ | 8,985 | ||
Purchased Water Offset Increases |
2,049 | |||
Balancing Account Adjustments |
168 | |||
Step Rate Increases |
384 | |||
Total Increase in Rates |
$ | 11,586 | ||
Total Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $80.3 million for the first quarter of 2009, versus $68.1 million
for the same period in 2008, an 18% increase.
Water production expense consists of purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes. It
represents the largest component of total operating expenses, accounting for approximately 36% of
total operating expenses in the first quarter of 2009. Water production expenses increased 14%
compared to the same period last year due to increased cost of all components of water
production, although usage was down.
Sources of water as a percent of total water production are listed in the following table:
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Well production |
42 | % | 44 | % | ||||
Purchased |
54 | % | 52 | % | ||||
Surface |
4 | % | 4 | % | ||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
19
Table of Contents
Washington Water, New Mexico Water and Hawaii Water obtain all of their water supply from wells.
The components of water production costs are shown in the table below:
Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||
Purchased water |
$ | 22,940 | $ | 20,711 | $ | 2,229 | ||||||
Purchased power |
4,543 | 3,454 | 1,089 | |||||||||
Pump taxes |
1,385 | 1,193 | 192 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 28,868 | $ | 25,358 | $ | 3,510 | ||||||
Purchased water costs increased primarily due to price increases from water wholesalers. Total
water production measured in acre feet decreased by 6% during the first quarter of 2009 as
compared with the first quarter of 2008 due to higher precipitation, as compared to the same
period in 2008.
Administrative and general expense and other operations expense increased 23% to $31.3 million.
The primary increase was due to increased pension and postretirement benefit costs, other benefit
costs, and outside legal services. Effective January 1, 2009, wage increases became effective
and there was an increase in the number of employees. At March 31, 2009, there were 925 employees
and at March 31, 2008, there were 907 employees.
Maintenance expenses increased by 13% to $4.6 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to
$4.1 million in the first quarter of 2008, due to increase in main repairs. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased $1.0 million, or 11%, because of 2008 capital additions.
Federal and state income taxes charged to operating expenses and other income and expenses
increased $1.0 million, from a provision of $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2008 to $1.2
million in the first quarter of 2009, due to an increase in pretax income. We expect the
effective tax rate to be between 38% and 40% for fiscal year 2009.
Other Income and Expense
Non-regulated revenue, net of related expenses,
and gain on sale of
non-utility property reflected income of $0.5 million for the first
quarter of 2009, compared to a loss of $0.1 million in the same period last year, which is an
increase of $0.6 million. The change from the prior year is due to the gain on sale of
non-utility property.
Interest Expense
Total
interest expense, net of interest capitalized, decreased $0.2 million to $4.4 million for
the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period last year. This decrease was attributable
to the increased capitalized interest resulting from capital expenditure activity.
REGULATORY MATTERS
Rates and Regulations
The state regulatory commissions have plenary powers setting rates and operating standards. As
such, state commission decisions significantly impact our revenues, earnings, and cash flows. The
amounts discussed herein are generally annual amounts, unless specifically stated, and the
financial impact to recorded revenue is expected to occur over a 12-month period from the
effective date of the decision. In California, water utilities are required to make several
different types of filings. Most filings result in rate changes that remain in place until the
next General Rate Case (GRC). As explained below, surcharges and surcredits to recover balancing
and memorandum accounts as well as the catch-up are temporary rate changes, which have specific
time frames for recovery.
GRCs, step rate increase filings, and offset filings change rates to amounts that will remain in
effect until the next GRC. The CPUC follows a rate case plan, which requires Cal Water to file a
GRC for each of its 24 regulated operating districts every three years. In a GRC proceeding, the
CPUC not only considers the utilitys rate setting requests, but may also consider other issues
that affect the utilitys rates and operations. Effective in 2004, Cal Waters GRC schedule was
shifted from a calendar year to a fiscal year with test years commencing on July 1st of each
year. The CPUC is generally required to issue its GRC decision prior to the
20
Table of Contents
first day of the test year or authorize interim rates. As such, Cal Waters GRC decisions, prior
to 2005, were generally issued in the fourth quarter, but are now expected to be issued in the
second quarter of each year until 2011, when the updated rate case plan takes effect. A decision
on the eight GRCs filed in July of 2006 was delayed beyond July 1, 2007. As required by state
law, the CPUC authorized interim rates incorporating the last twelve-months change in CPI. A
final decision on the 2006 GRC was made on December 20, 2007 with final rates billed effective on
January 1, 2008. A provision in the final decision allows recovery of the revenue lost due to the
delay over a twelve-month period beginning in the first quarter of 2008.
Between GRC filings utilities may file escalation rate increases, which allow the utility to
recover cost increases, primarily from inflation and incremental investment, during the second
and third years of the rate case cycle. However, escalation rate increases are subject to a
weather-normalized earnings test. Under the earnings test, the CPUC may reduce the escalation
rate increase to prevent the utility from earning in excess of the authorized rate of return for
that district.
In addition, utilities are entitled to file offset filings. Offset filings may be filed to adjust
revenues for construction projects authorized in GRCs when the plant is placed in service or for
rate changes charged to the Company for purchased water, purchased power, and pump taxes
(referred to as offsettable expenses). Such rate changes approved in offset filings remain in
effect until a GRC is approved.
Surcharges and surcredits, which are usually effective for a twelve-month period, are authorized
by the CPUC to recover the memorandum and balancing accounts under- and over- collections usually
due to changes in offsettable expenses. However, significant under-collection may be authorized
over multiple years. Typically, an expense difference occurs during the time period from when an
offsettable expense rate changes and we are allowed to adjust its water rates. Expense changes
for this regulatory lag period, which may exceed two months, are booked into memorandum and
balancing accounts for later recovery. These accounts are subject to reasonableness reviews.
Future recovery of balancing account balances will be addressed in general rate cases or by
advice letter filings if the account balance is greater than 2% of revenues. As of December 31,
2008 and March 31, 2009, the amount in the balancing accounts was $1.5 million and $1.2 million,
respectively.
We do not record an asset (or liability) for the recovery (or refund) of expense balancing or
memorandum accounts in our consolidated financial statements as revenue (refunds), nor as a
receivable (or payable), until the CPUC and other regulators have authorized recovery and the
customer is billed. Therefore, a timing difference may occur between when costs are recorded as
an expense and the associated revenues are received (or refunds are made) and booked.
Remaining Unrecorded Balances from Previously Authorized Balancing Accounts
Recoveries/Refunds
The total of unrecorded, under-collected memorandum and balancing accounts was approximately $1.2
million as of March 31, 2009. Included in this amount, Cal Water has amounts from districts that
are pending further action when balances become large enough to warrant action of either recovery
or refund.
Rate Case Plan
In December 2005, the CPUC issued the California Water Action Plan. The plan focuses on four key
principles, among other things, including safe, high quality water; highly reliable water
supplies; efficient use of water; and reasonable rates and viable utilities. In accordance with
the Water Action Plans objective to streamline regulatory decision-making the CPUC issued
R.06-12-016 in December 2006, to address streamlining of its water rate case plan. The CPUC
issued D.07-05-062 on May 24, 2007 adopting a new rate case plan. As a result, Cal Water will be
filing a company-wide general rate case every three years beginning in July 2009. Rates would be
effective approximately 18 months from the filing date or January 1, 2011 in the first cycle. As
an interim measure, the CPUC allowed Cal Water to incorporate general operations costs including
company benefits in rates for all districts in July 2008 after a decision in its 2007 general
rate case. In addition, for the sixteen districts that have a delayed effective date, the CPUC
will authorize interim rates from the authorized effective date under the old rate case plan.
These interim rates will be subject to adjustment based on a final determination in the 2009
general rate case filing. In addition to general rate case processing, the RCP set a schedule for
separate cost of capital applications. Under the RCP, Cal Water must file its cost of capital
application every three years. The first application under this procedure was made on May 1,
2008. Cal Waters 2008 cost of capital application was consolidated with applications of two
other multi-district Class A water utilities into a combined proceeding.
21
Table of Contents
2009 Regulatory Activity to Date
In January and February 2009, Cal Water filed advice letters to offset increased purchased water
and pump tax rates in seven of its regulated districts totaling $9.9 million in annual revenue.
Under CPUC advice letter processing rules, Cal Water charges the rates in expense offset advice
letters to its customers upon filing. These rates were approved in late February 2009. However, expense
offsets are dollar-for-dollar increases in revenue to match increased expenses and interact with
the WRAM and MCBA mechanisms so that net operating revenue is not affected by an offset
increase.
In January 2009 the City of Hawthorne approved Cal Waters requested rate increase for its
leased water system. The increase will take effect in phases, with a $0.8 million annual
increase in February 2009, a $1.0 million annual increase in July 2009, and a $1.2 million
annual increase in January 2010.
In January 2009 Cal Water filed an application to the CPUC for approvals and consents related to
its secured debt offering, which was completed on April 17, 2009. The application included,
among other things, requests for (i) a waiver of a CPUC policy, which would allow debt offerings
by Cal Water of up to $100 million in principal amount be conducted through a single underwriter
and (ii) clarification that complying with the terms of the indenture for the outstanding
unsecured notes by granting the holders a first mortgage security interest upon the issuance of
additional first mortgage debt does not use any of the Cal Waters previously used financing
authorization. This application was approved by the Commission in March 2009. On March 30,
2009, the CPUC issued decision 09-03-038 granting Cal Water (i) a competitive bidding rule
exemption for the issuance of $100 million of first mortgage bonds to the extent that no one
purchaser from Cal Water is permitted to acquire more than $20 million in debt in a calendar
year, (ii) authority to exchange $260 million of its senior notes for first mortgage bonds
without obtaining additional financing authority, and (iii) a competitive bidding rule exemption
for an exchange of $260 million of senior notes for first mortgage bonds.
Throughout the calendar year, Cal Water plans to file advice letters to offset expected
increases in purchased water and pump tax charges in some districts. Cal Water cannot predict
the exact timing or dollar amount of the changes. However, expense offsets are dollar-for-dollar
increases in revenue to match increased expenses and interact with the WRAM and MCBA mechanisms
so that net operating revenue is not affected by an offset increase.
In May 2009, as allowed in the Commissions 2007 Rate Case Plan, Cal Water intends to file
advice letters for interim rate increases for eight districts effective in July 2009. Under the
Commissions prior rate case plan, these districts would have had rates effective in July 2009.
The interim rate changes will be adjusted once the Commission has issued a determination in Cal
Waters 2009 GRC, expected in the fourth quarter of 2010.
In May 2009, Cal Water intends to file for step rate increases effective in July for sixteen
districts. The CPUCs current practice on approving step rate increases is based partly on
inflation through March 2009. Inputs to the weather-adjusted earnings test include recorded
information through March 2009. Therefore, Cal Water does not know the amount of its request at
this time.
In July 2009, Cal Water is required to file a GRC covering all 24 regulated districts and
general expenses. Cal Water expects the CPUC to issue a decision in the proceeding in the fourth
quarter of 2010 with rates effective in January 2011. Cal Water cannot predict the magnitude of
any potential rate changes at this time.
LIQUIDITY
Cash flows from Operations
Cash flows from operations were $11.5 million for the first quarter of 2009. Cash flows from
operations is primarily generated by changes in our operating assets and liabilities. Cash
generated by operations varies during the year which is dependent upon customer billings and
timing of estimated tax payments.
During the first quarter of 2009, we made contributions to our pension and retiree health care
plan of $11.6 million compared to $176 paid during the first quarter of 2008. As approved in the 2007 General Rate Case, we will be increasing the funding level of our
pension and retiree health care plan compared with prior years.
The water business is seasonal. Revenue is lower in the cool, wet winter months when less water
is used compared to the warm, dry summer months when water use is highest. This seasonality
results in the possible need for short-term borrowings under the bank lines of credit in the
event cash is not available during the winter period. The increase in cash flows during the
summer allows short-term borrowings to be paid down. Customer water usage can be lower than
normal in years when more than normal
22
Table of Contents
precipitation falls in our service areas or temperatures are lower than normal, especially in the
summer months. The reduction in water usage reduces cash flows from operations and increases the
need for short-term bank borrowings. In addition, short-term borrowings are used to finance
capital expenditures until long-term financing is arranged.
Investing Activities
During the first quarter of 2009, we had company-funded capital expenditures of $23.5 million.
For 2009, our capital budget is approximately $100 to $120 million.
Financing Activities
During the first quarter of 2009, there were no debt or equity offerings; however, we began to
utilize our bank lines of credit as anticipated. In April 2009, Cal Water issued $100 million of
First Mortgage Bonds at the rate of 5.875 due in 2019, which are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Company. Proceeds were used to pay down Cal Waters short-term borrowings and
will be added to Cal Waters general funds to be used for capital expenditures and other
corporate items. Dividend payments were higher than the prior year due to an increased dividend
rate paid in the current year.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Short-term liquidity is provided by bank lines of credit funds extended to us and certain of our
subsidiaries and by internally generated funds. Long-term financing is accomplished through the
use of both debt and equity. As of March 31, 2009, there were short-term borrowings of $52
million outstanding on the line of credit. There were short-term bank borrowings of $40 million
at December 31, 2008.
There were no significant additions to long-term debt in the first quarter of 2009, and we made
principal payments on our first mortgage bonds and other long-term debt payments of $483 during
the first quarter of 2009. As noted above, subsequent to March 31, 2009, we issued $100 million
of First Mortgage Bonds. In connection with this issuance, Cal Waters outstanding senior notes
in the aggregate principal amount of $259 million were exchanged for first mortgage bonds with
the same interest rate and maturities the previously outstanding senior notes for which they were
exchanged.
Long-term financing, which includes senior notes, other debt securities, and common stock, has
typically been used to replace short-term borrowings and fund capital expenditures. Internally
generated funds, after making dividend payments, provide positive cash flow, but have not been at
a level to meet the needs of our capital expenditure requirements. Management expects this trend
to continue given our capital expenditures plan for the next 5 years. Some capital expenditures
are funded by payments received from developers for contributions in aid of construction or
advances for construction. Funds received for contributions in aid of construction are
non-refundable, whereas funds classified as advances in construction are refundable. Management
believes long-term financing is available to meet our cash flow needs through issuances in both
debt and equity instruments.
Credit Ratings
Cal Waters first mortgage bonds are rated by Standard & Poors (S&P). Since 2004, the credit
rating agency has maintained their rating of A+ and characterized us as stable. On April 8, 2009,
Standard & Poors issued a rating of AA- on the 5.875% $100 million First Mortgage Bonds issued
in April. If rating were downgraded in the future, it may result in a higher interest rate on
future debt.
Dividends, Book Value and Shareholders
The first quarter common stock dividend of $0.2950 per share was paid on February 20, 2009,
compared to a quarterly dividend in the first quarter of 2008 of $0.2925. This was Cal Waters
257th consecutive quarterly dividend. Annualized, the 2009 dividend rate is $1.18 per common
share, compared to $1.17 in 2008. For the full year 2008, the payout ratio was 62% of net income.
On a long-term basis, our goal is to achieve a dividend payout ratio of 60% of net income
accomplished through future earnings growth.
At its April 29, 2009 meeting, the Board declared the second quarter dividend of $0.2950 per
share payable on May 15, 2009, to stockholders of record on May 4, 2009. This will be our 258th
consecutive quarterly dividend.
23
Table of Contents
2009 Financing Plan
Cal Water is currently reviewing its financing needs for 2009 and 2010. We intend to fund our
capital needs in future periods through a relatively balanced approach between long-term debt and
equity.
Book Value and Stockholders of Record
Book value per common share was $19.25 at March 31, 2009 compared to $19.44 at December 31, 2008.
There are approximately 2,675 stockholders of record for our common stock, as of our record date,
March 31, 2009.
Utility Plant Expenditures
During the first quarter of 2009, capital expenditures totaled $25 million; $23.5 million was
from company-funded projects and $1.5 million was from third-party-funded projects. The planned
2009 company-funded capital expenditure budget is approximately $100 to $120 million. The actual
amount may vary from the budget number due to timing of actual payments related to current year
projects and prior year projects. We do not control third-party-funded capital expenditures and
therefore are unable to estimate the amount of such projects for 2009.
At March 31, 2009, construction work in progress was $91.9 million compared to $80.6 million at
December 31, 2008. Work in progress includes projects that are under construction but not yet
complete and placed in service.
WATER SUPPLY
Our source of supply varies among our operating districts. Certain districts obtain all of their
supply from wells; some districts purchase all of their supply from wholesale suppliers; and
other districts obtain supply from a combination of wells and wholesale suppliers. A small
portion of supply comes from surface sources and is processed through Company-owned water
treatment plants. To the best of managements knowledge, we are meeting water quality,
environmental, and other regulatory standards for all company-owned systems.
Californias normal weather pattern yields little precipitation between mid-spring and mid-fall.
The Washington Water service areas receive precipitation in all seasons, with the heaviest
amounts during the winter. New Mexico Waters rainfall is heaviest in the summer monsoon season.
Hawaii Water receives precipitation throughout the year, with the largest amounts in the winter
months. Water usage in all service areas is highest during the warm and dry summers and declines
in the cool winter months. Rain and snow during the winter months replenish underground water
aquifers and fill reservoirs, providing the water supply for subsequent delivery to customers. To
date, snowpack water content and rainfall accumulation during the 2008 2009 water year is 91%
of normal (as of April 2, 2009 per the California Department of Water Resources). Precipitation
in the prior year was below average. Management believes that supply pumped from underground
aquifers and purchased from wholesale suppliers will be adequate to meet customer demand during
2009 and beyond. However, water rationing may be required in 2009, if declared by the state or
local jurisdictions. Long-term water supply plans are developed for each of our districts to help
assure an adequate water supply under various operating and supply conditions. Some districts
have unique challenges in meeting water quality standards, but management believes that supplies
will meet current standards using current treatment processes.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
During the three-months ended March 31, 2009, there were no material changes in contractual
obligations outside the normal course of business.
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not hold, trade in or issue derivative financial instruments and therefore are not exposed
to risks these instruments present. Our market risk to interest rate exposure is limited because
the cost of long-term financing and short-term bank borrowings,
24
Table of Contents
including interest costs, is covered in consumer water rates as approved by the commissions. We
do not have foreign operations; therefore, we do not have a foreign currency exchange risk. Our
business is sensitive to commodity prices and is most affected by changes in purchased water and
purchased power costs.
Historically, the CPUCs balancing account or offsetable expense procedures allowed for increases
in purchased water and purchased power costs to be passed on to consumers. Traditionally, a
significant percentage of our net income and cash flows comes from California regulated
operations; therefore the CPUCs actions have a significant impact on our business. See Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies Expense Balancing and Memorandum Accounts and Regulatory Matters.
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(c) under
the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that
any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to
apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
Our management, with the participation of our CEO and our CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of April 13, 2009. Based on that evaluation, we concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level
(b) Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
25
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Chico Groundwater/Wausau Insurance Matter
In 1995, the State of Californias Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) named us as a
potential responsible party for cleanup of toxic contamination plumes, which contain
perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Chico groundwater. In December
2002, we were named along with other defendants in two lawsuits filed by DTSC for the cleanup of
the plumes. In 2007, we entered into Court approved consent decrees (Consent Decrees). The
Consent Decrees conditioned our performance upon many factors, including, but not limited to,
water pumped and treated by us must meet regulatory standards so we may distribute to its
customers. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decrees, we will incur capital costs of $1.5
million and future operating costs with a present value of approximately $2.6 million. In our
2007 general rate case (GRC) settlement negotiations, Division of Ratepayer Advocates have
tentatively agreed to track all costs associated with the Consent Decrees, including legal costs
to pursue insurance coverage, for potential future recovery in rates.
In connection with these suits, our insurance carrier, Employers Insurance of Wausau (Wausau)
filed a separate lawsuit against us for reimbursement of past defense costs which approximate
$1.5 million and a declaratory determination of coverage. On January 23, 2008, the Court heard
various parties motions and on September 25, 2008 issued its rulings that Wausau had a duty to
defend; therefore, the Company will not have to reimburse Wausau for previously incurred defense
costs. The Court did not find Wausaus actions were intended to harm the Company, so punitive
damages will not be recoverable by the Company. However, the Court also found that the issue of
policy coverage will be determined at trial. A trial date has been set for May 26, 2009. Based on
the Courts rulings, the Company has not recorded any liability associated with reimbursement of
costs to defend and expensing the related costs as incurred. We continue to believe that the
claims are covered under the insurance policies. However, if our claim is ultimately found to be
excludable under the insurance policies, the Company believes that recovery of costs associated
with the Consent Decrees are probable from either its equitable indemnity lawsuit against
manufacturers and distributors of perchloroethylene, also know as tetrachloroethylene, (PCE) in
California; or through rate increases in the future. Therefore, no accrual or contingency has
been recorded for this matter.
Other Groundwater Contamination
The Company has been and is involved in litigation against third parties to recover past and
future costs related to ground water contamination in our service areas. The cost of litigation is
expensed as incurred and any settlement is first offset against such costs. Any settlement in
excess of the cost to litigate is accounted for on a case by case basis based upon the nature of
the settlement. It is anticipated that the majority of the settlement will be reflected as a
benefit to the rate payers by offsetting future operating or capital costs.
The Company is involved in a lawsuit against major oil refineries regarding the contamination of
the ground water as a result of the gas additive MTBE. The Company entered into a partial
settlement with the defendants in April of 2008 that represent approximately 70% of the
responsible parties (as determined by the Superior Court). Based on the allocation matrix, on
October 22, 2008, the Company received $34.2 million after deducting attorneys fees and
litigation expenses. The Company is aggressively pursuing legal action against the remaining
responsible parties. The Company is in the process of determining with the Commission the
appropriate regulatory treatment of the proceeds. It is anticipated that the proceeds will be
used by the Company on infrastructure improvements. The Company is in the process of filing with
the Internal Revenue Service a request for a private letter ruling regarding the taxability of the
proceeds.
The Company believes the proceeds are non-taxable based upon its intent to reinvest them in
qualifying assets. In 2009, when an agreement is reached with the Commission regarding the
regulatory treatment, or when the taxability is determined based upon proceedings with the
Internal Revenue Service, the Company will adjust the accounting of the settlement accordingly.
As previously reported, Cal Water has filed with the City of Bakersfield, in the Superior Court of
California, a lawsuit that names potentially responsible parties, who manufactured and distributed
products containing 1,2,3 trichloropropane (TCP) in California. TCP has been detected in the
ground water. The lawsuit seeks to recover treatment costs necessary to remove TCP. The Court has
26
Table of Contents
now coordinated our action with other water purveyor cases (TCP Cases JCCP 4435) in San Bernardino
County. No trial date has yet been set.
The Company has filed in San Mateo County Superior Court a complaint (California Water Service
Company v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al. CIV 473093) against potentially responsible parties
that manufactured and distributed products, which contained perchloroethylene, also know as
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in California, to recover the past, present, and future treatment costs.
No trial date has yet been set.
Other Legal Matters
From time to time, the Company has been named as a co-defendant in several asbestos related
lawsuits. The Company has been dismissed without prejudice in several of these cases. In other cases our contractors and our insurance policy carriers have settled the cases with no effect on our financial statements. As such we do not currently believe that there is any potential loss which is probable of occurring related to these matters and therefore no accrual or contingency has been recorded.
From time to time, the Company is involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise
in the ordinary course of business. We review the status of each significant matter and assess its
potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount of the range of loss can be estimated, we accrue a liability
for the estimated loss in accordance with SFAS No 5, Accounting of Contingencies. Legal
proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict. Because of
such uncertainties, accruals are based on the best information available at the time. While the
outcome of these disputes and litigation matters cannot be predicted with any certainty,
management does not believe that when taking into account existing reserves that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will materially affect our financial position, results of operations,
or cash flows.
27
Table of Contents
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit | Description | |
10.1
|
Amendment No. 2 to Loan Agreement dated as of April 17, 2009 between Bank of America, N.A. and California Water Service Company (Exhibit 10.1 to current report on From 8-K of the registrant dated April 21, 2009). | |
10.2
|
Amendment No. 1 to Loan Agreement dated as of April 17, 2009 among Bank of America, N.A. and California Water Service Group, CWS Utility Services, Washington Water Service Company, New Mexico Water Service Company, and Hawaii Water Service Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10.2 to current report on From 8-K of the registrant dated April 21, 2009). | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 |
28
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP Registrant |
||||
May 11, 2009 | ||||
By: | /s/ Martin A. Kropelnicki | |||
Martin A. Kropelnicki | ||||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
29
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | Description | |
10.1
|
Amendment No. 2 to Loan Agreement dated as of April 17, 2009 between Bank of America, N.A. and California Water Service Company (Exhibit 10.1 to current report on From 8-K of the registrant dated April 21, 2009). | |
10.2
|
Amendment No. 1 to Loan Agreement dated as of April 17, 2009 among Bank of America, N.A. and California Water Service Group, CWS Utility Services, Washington Water Service Company, New Mexico Water Service Company, and Hawaii Water Service Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10.2 to current report on From 8-K of the registrant dated April 21, 2009). | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer certification of financial statements pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 |
30